3 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, underwriting (UW) a 100bps cap rate compression by year 5 can be challenging to substantiate, especially in the current market environment. Here are some considerations to help you justify or adjust your assumptions:

  1. Market Trends and Historical Data:

    • Cap rate compression has been driven historically by factors like low-interest rates, abundant capital, and strong rent growth. However, recent discussions on WSO suggest that cap rates are expanding in many markets due to rising interest rates, shrinking liquidity pools, and investor skepticism.
    • For example, some threads highlight cap rate expansions of 100-150bps in certain processes, reflecting a shift in market dynamics.
  2. Interest Rate Environment:

    • Rising interest rates are a key driver of cap rate expansion. If debt costs are increasing (e.g., quotes starting with 5% or 6% for leverage), it becomes harder to justify compression unless there’s a strong counteracting force like exceptional rent growth or supply constraints.
  3. Asset-Specific and Regional Factors:

    • Cap rate trends are highly asset-type and region-specific. For instance, well-located value-add multifamily deals may still see strong interest, but commodity-like assets are facing less demand.
    • Consider the specific market dynamics of your asset's location and type. Are there unique factors (e.g., supply constraints, demographic trends) that could drive compression?
  4. Investor Sentiment and Dry Powder:

    • Some WSO threads mention that abundant dry powder in the market has kept return metrics (like IRRs) compressing, which could indirectly support cap rate compression. However, this is contingent on continued capital inflows and investor confidence.
  5. Stress Testing and Conservative Assumptions:

    • A widely accepted industry standard for future sale valuations is to assume a cap rate expansion of 5bps per year. This conservative approach aligns with the idea of underwriting stabilized year 11 NOI at a higher exit cap rate.
    • If you’re holding 100bps compression, ensure your model accounts for stress scenarios where this assumption doesn’t hold. For example, what happens to your returns if cap rates expand instead?
  6. Substantiating Compression:

    • Use rent growth projections, supply-demand imbalances, and comparable sales data to justify your assumption. If your market has strong fundamentals (e.g., limited new supply, high population growth), it may support compression.
    • Highlight any unique factors that differentiate your asset or market from broader trends.

In summary, while 100bps compression by year 5 is aggressive in the current environment, it could be substantiated with strong market fundamentals and a clear narrative. However, given the macro outlook, it’s crucial to stress test your model and consider more conservative scenarios to ensure feasibility.

Sources: Are cap rates still compressing?, Cap Rate expansion in multifamily/development?, State of Market Discussion, A Discussion on Interest Rates/Macro Fundamentals (Long OP), 2020: Real Estate Bonuses

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Think it’ll more depend on the sector fundamentals (which requires not just a macro view but taking a look at the submarket inventory/migration pattern/upcoming developments/etc) and medium term interest rate outlook (personally believe rates will have to come down, it’s not a matter of if but when - reasonable to assume it will by year 5).
 

I’d personally UW the investment without any cap rate compression to see how much of the return is being driven by operational efficiency as opposed to asset appreciation. Then I’d create a sensitivity table with exit cap rate and its impact on returns. Just my 2cents

 

Ad dolores rerum nostrum. Id sed est commodi sapiente qui et quis quia. Quos cumque sint voluptatem tempore. Debitis architecto rerum esse est. Possimus tempore est perspiciatis voluptatem. Saepe quod id velit error inventore. Odit cupiditate harum voluptatum tempore sed autem tenetur.

Rerum autem illum vel et sed. Recusandae et occaecati molestiae non et. Officiis ea sequi hic debitis accusamus sint repellendus quia. Quidem officiis dolores ipsam dolore optio. Eveniet velit commodi ad vel rerum in voluptatem.

Sit odio ut placeat sit. Iusto vel iusto dolor aut sit eos. Nulla dicta suscipit voluptatem perferendis fugiat.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”