Real Estate (IB or PE?)
I’m looking for some advice on my career path and would love to get some feedback from those who have experience in both IB and PE, particularly with a focus on real estate. Background: I just graduated from Cal Berkeley’s Haas School of Business, and I’m at a crossroads. Long-term, my goal is to start my own real estate investment firm, raising capital through LPs to build a diversified portfolio. I’m trying to figure out the best area to build expertise so that I don’t waste time and can make myself indispensable, especially during tough economic cycles. I’ve narrowed down my options to two main paths:
- Investment Banking (Real Estate Focus) – Analyst Role
- Learning financial modeling, deal structuring, and capital markets. - Gaining transaction experience on large real estate deals (M&A, REITs, etc.). - Building a network of investors and institutional clients.
- Private Equity (Real Estate Focus) - Accountant.
- RoleUnderstanding the financials and operations behind real estate deals. - Getting exposure to asset management, fund operations, and reporting. - Developing an understanding of how funds are structured and managed.
The Dilemma: On the one hand, IB seems like it would give me broader exposure to deals and help me understand the bigger picture of financing, which would be valuable when raising capital. On the other hand, PE could give me a solid foundation in understanding the mechanics of real estate assets and fund management, which is key for running an LP-backed firm. My Question: Which path would better set me up for success in starting a real estate investment firm in the long term? Should I focus on the deal-making and capital markets exposure I’d get in IB, or would the operational and financial insight from PE be more useful? I appreciate any thoughts or personal experiences on which route might be better for building the skills I need to succeed in real estate investing!
Investment Banking - Starting in IB is never a bad idea, but you aren't going to get as much "asset" experience compared to being an Analyst at a GP. You are going to be looking at assets/portfolios holistically but not getting granular and learning what you need to do to go out on your own.
Accounting - I would not recommend this considering where you would like to end up. Accounting is a back office role where you do not get any exposure to sourcing debt/equity, underwriting, asset management, etc. Sure you can learn fund structure and reporting, but there are portfolio management positions that do the same thing + have exposure to the activities stated above.
It sounds like your long-term goal is to start a GP fund that uses LP capital deal-by-deal. Why would you not want to start your career at a GP fund? If you can join a successful GP with an impressive, long-standing track record and learn their functions inside and out, going out on your own will be way easier.
Most common answer to the "why not work at a GP?" is the pay cut it entails when compared to IB/PE out of college.
Interview with purpose and make a decision based on offers received. There is no point in being fixated on specific role especially fresh out of college in the current market...
Do not start as an accountant
Between those 2, IB sounds better. Honestly if you want to be a CRE GP, leasing/brokerage or asset mgt in your preferred asset class might the better move.
As someone who is in real estate investment banking, I would recommend repe (if you want to start a fund). However, from talking to many fund managers, it seems like the fund world is getting hard and harder. To succeed as a new fund manager, you would probably have to invest in very niche, specific things to convince people to invest in your fund (they would rather just give their money to the big fund managers). The consolidation of funds is personally why I've decided to not pursue repe after reib - don't want to start some niche fund or just some mm repe fund in the long term.
Quia aut dolores cupiditate et ut. Impedit nemo non maxime non modi tempore voluptatem. Mollitia autem nesciunt vel et vitae nemo. Maiores rerum repellat laboriosam quia amet. Officia dolores sed inventore earum autem facere ratione. Facilis reiciendis rerum tenetur. Dolores enim harum alias hic nisi ea a minus.
Ullam iste praesentium autem qui est. Autem officiis quae eius repudiandae. Sequi repellat odit quasi illum voluptate perferendis nostrum. Et ipsa qui consequatur ea et unde.
Qui itaque similique doloribus nobis quae. Et earum omnis quia. Illo voluptatem tempore earum suscipit enim et quia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...