Waterfall model - IRRs with equity multiples

Some of you might know me as the guy who turned up here yesterday looking for help on an underwriting model. I now have a query on what must be the least fun thing to model: a waterfall distribution at fund level. Something that is different from other examples I've seen: capital is contributed and distributed on intermittently throughout the life of the fund (i.e. in month 6, $1M is contributed, and $0.5M is distributed - and I'm struggling to reconcile this.

In particular, terms for tiers 4 and 5 of the waterfall state the following:

  • Tier 4: 20% to GP and 80% to LP until the LP has received a **1.80X ** equity multiple on total LP invested capital
  • Tier 5: 100% to GP and 0% to LP until the Manager has received an amount equal to 20.0% of the fund net profit through such period

Does anyone have experience mixing the 'metrics' within an IRR in the above way? Would you be willing to share any insights? In particular I'm struggling to combine and compare the IRR and equity multiple in Tier 4.

3 Comments
 
Best Response
"[email protected]" Some of you might know me as the guy who turned up here yesterday looking for help on an underwriting model. I now have a query on what must be the least fun thing to model: a waterfall distribution at fund level. Something that is different from other examples I've seen: capital is contributed and distributed on intermittently throughout the life of the fund (i.e. in month 6, $1M is contributed, and $0.5M is distributed - and I'm struggling to reconcile this.

In particular, terms for tiers 4 and 5 of the waterfall state the following: - Tier 4: 20% to GP and 80% to LP until the LP has received a **1.80X ** equity multiple on total LP invested capital - Tier 5: 100% to GP and 0% to LP until the Manager has received an amount equal to 20.0% of the fund net profit through such period

Does anyone have experience mixing the 'metrics' within an IRR in the above way? Would you be willing to share any insights? In particular I'm struggling to combine and compare the IRR and equity multiple in Tier 4.

I'm not seeing where the IRR is in this case. Seems to be a waterfall based off of MOICs with a catchup clause built in on Tier 5. There is no time value of money concept in the 2 tiers you've described above.

For catchups, just write it out as a simple linear algebra equation and figure out what the fraction would have to be off of the preceding tiers.

 

Dolores voluptas asperiores dicta voluptas temporibus. Ut quisquam enim adipisci. Fuga eum voluptas quod ex odio itaque velit culpa. Et non quidem alias occaecati molestias odio ducimus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”