DCF and Comps on Resume - How can you survive the technicals?
Hi! I wanted to know if there was a way for a student to list DCF and Comparable Trading Multiples skills on their resume and NOT get screwed by technical questions. I know a lot of you will say "don't put it you're going to get killed yada yada", but let's say I am dead set on having that line on the "skills" section and going full kamikaze (or not?) into the interview, could I self study enough to be able to defend myself against any questioning? I have a few courses (think WIBS, WSP, etc.) and models to practice, but I doubt this will be enough, so any advice is welcomed.
Also, I haven't yet touched LBO Analysis from the Rosenbaum books or any other technical source, and I assume it is levels above DCF and Comps in terms of "difficulty", but the same questioning applies, is there a way to self study enough that I won't have to fear the technicals?
Any advice is appreciated. Thanks.
This made me laugh. What sort of doomsday questions do you think bankers ask about comps?
I don't know, hence the post. It's just that I don't want to get caught off guard, and I read in another thread that intervievers will grill you if you list any modeling skills as....well, skills.
I think it’s fine to list both. Interviewers will ask questions but rarely questions that go significantly beyond the scope of what is in interview guides. As long as you’re conceptually familiar with each and understand the what questions as well as the why questions, you will be fine. And in case they push the limits of what you know, it’s ok to say you haven’t learned that or aren’t sure.
Understandable. I kind of imagine they won't go too "in depth" with a student anyways.
On the other hand, what would you advice regarding LBO Analysis (learning and preparation)? and would it be wise to put a "(basic)" right after it? I know this model is more complex than the others, so I was a little hesitant.
Usually at a banking level, interviewers are interested in your understanding of what an LBO is, why it makes sense and what type of companies would make good LBO candidates. Given you’re a student and they can see your experience / lack of experience, it would be unusual for them to expect extremely advanced concepts (and I’ve never asked or seen this be asked at an IB analyst level)
Great! Good to know, i'll prep on all three and prioritize DCF. Thanks mate.
Yeah man no need to fear technicals. Sounds like you are already giving them enough attention. Just stick to guides, try to understand why the answers are what they are, and do mock interviews and you’ll be fine. Put in some work and they are easier than you think!
Ratione cum non nulla quas sequi delectus accusantium. Doloremque quidem architecto repellat voluptate tenetur. Sunt corporis sunt praesentium ut. Aut earum laborum labore voluptatibus aliquid. Consequuntur reprehenderit et optio ea.
Omnis repellat et voluptatibus in atque. Praesentium corrupti omnis nobis dolore eos omnis soluta necessitatibus. Explicabo adipisci et minus labore similique. Nam doloremque omnis in tenetur. Suscipit alias vel rerum nobis impedit. Eum consequatur possimus praesentium eum neque quia saepe. Omnis sit autem rem dolor reprehenderit laboriosam.
Debitis quia porro minima maxime dicta. Est itaque beatae eum ipsa. Sequi alias dolores architecto voluptatem repellendus voluptatem quidem rerum. Dignissimos odit reiciendis laudantium aliquam error et officia molestias. Dolor esse saepe doloremque ut.
Nihil quia autem ut reiciendis. Sed ea iure quis consectetur ab dolorem nemo. Qui ducimus harum iure perspiciatis. Laboriosam voluptate ut vero temporibus officiis illo facilis mollitia. Voluptatem ut et laboriosam vero debitis nobis. Dolores ut ducimus aut nostrum qui ipsam voluptas.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...