23 Comments
 
GoIllini
alexpaschActually, just round it up to the ones place...your GPA is a 4...congrats!

Since when does 3.447 round up to 4?

dats da johke
 

If you think someone is going to care that you have 3.5 over a 3.4 then I'm sure they'll care when they see you fudged it. I would stick with rounding once.

 

^agreed... if you free uncomfortable enough to post this and ask, it's probably best to be conservative and round to 3.45...

 

It is acceptable to round to 3.45. Rounding to 3.5 is way too high. 3.46 --> 3.50 unacceptable, 3.47 --> 3.5 borderline acceptable, 3.48 --> 3.5 okay, 3.49 --> 3.5 perfect 3.5 --> 3.5 perfect, 3.51 --> 3.5 = stupid

 

I'm not advocating it, but honestly, my friend did something very similar (except it was 3.64something to 3.7) and no one said anything. It only really comes up after you have your offer and the company is running a background check on you. By then they're really not gonna care about a 0.05 difference from what you stated and reality

 
Best Response

I'll post a serious comment now. Let's be honest, if an employer asks you why your GPA is a 3.5 when u really have a 3.41 (let's say) you can say that it was because you are contesting a grade that you got in a class and this is w/o it, that it was your expected GPA, that circumstances had changed since you wrote the resume, or that you thought it was close enough to round up. Let's be honest, most employers aren't gonna scrutinize your GPA for rounding up so little. If you round a 2.8 to a 3.0..problem, a 2.9x to a 3.0, probably not. Assuming that you are at a semi target, a 3.5 isn't a fantastic GPA, but you do need it to get noticed. A 3.5 from a target is a similar prospect. From what it appears 3.0, 3.5, and 3.7 are all the cutoffs from Passing, to acceptable, to outstanding respectively. It's not a lot of risk for a lot of potential reward. M&I even says a 3.41--->3.5 because there is a way to explain it. If you are a junior or senior in college that .04 until conventional rounding is generally only one class.

Personally, If I was hiring (which I am not b/c I am in college) I would think that someone who didn't round up a 3.447 to a 3.5 is not willing to take risks. Some may see it as dishonest. You have to ask yourself if it is worth it.

Reality hits you hard, bro...
 
MMBinNCI'll post a serious comment now. Let's be honest, if an employer asks you why your GPA is a 3.5 when u really have a 3.41 (let's say) you can say that it was because you are contesting a grade that you got in a class and this is w/o it, that it was your expected GPA, that circumstances had changed since you wrote the resume, or that you thought it was close enough to round up. Let's be honest, most employers aren't gonna scrutinize your GPA for rounding up so little. If you round a 2.8 to a 3.0..problem, a 2.9x to a 3.0, probably not. Assuming that you are at a semi target, a 3.5 isn't a fantastic GPA, but you do need it to get noticed. A 3.5 from a target is a similar prospect. From what it appears 3.0, 3.5, and 3.7 are all the cutoffs from Passing, to acceptable, to outstanding respectively. It's not a lot of risk for a lot of potential reward. M&I even says a 3.41--->3.5 because there is a way to explain it. If you are a junior or senior in college that .04 until conventional rounding is generally only one class.

Personally, If I was hiring (which I am not b/c I am in college) I would think that someone who didn't round up a 3.447 to a 3.5 is not willing to take risks. Some may see it as dishonest. You have to ask yourself if it is worth it.

Out of all the many crazy things I've heard on this forum, this takes the cake as the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Taking risks is absolutely necessary, but lying about your gpa is in no way encouraged and absolutely not an acceptable "risk." No, lying about your gpa and saying it's a 3.5 it's not probably won't harm you in the long run. For the love of god though, if you get called out on it, do not say it was because you were contesting a grade. Might as well say it was a typo while you're at it...

@ op, do what you want. The fact that you're asking this question probably indicates you know better, but in the long run, I honestly can't see it mattering all that much. I guess put whatever feels the most comfortable to you?

 

Dolorem fugit eius nihil nihil beatae. Eaque odit a temporibus nulla. Voluptate quas quis illo consequuntur dolorem et.

Fugiat quidem aliquam sint facere neque. Iste qui voluptatem magni nihil assumenda et. Qui doloremque voluptatem ullam deleniti at neque adipisci quia. Sed officiis fugiat aut quam aut repellendus nihil est. Architecto commodi omnis rem voluptas magnam asperiores harum. Vel inventore nemo beatae sint.

Consectetur explicabo est officiis ullam dolor eos. Ab mollitia quos consequuntur non ab.

Saepe occaecati molestiae dolorem non ipsam. Saepe vero repellendus officia est iure et temporibus. Sequi animi eos nihil porro suscipit dolorem omnis. Repudiandae et beatae rerum qui expedita. Officiis consequatur sunt unde voluptatem sed temporibus. Quisquam perspiciatis illum fugiat cupiditate aut voluptatum rerum.

 

Eaque id vitae dicta dolorem occaecati. Dolor voluptas labore enim. Optio aut non dolorum nemo aut. Eos voluptatem ducimus minima voluptatem. Laboriosam nam nulla rerum velit aut et. Minima neque modi eaque ex aut dolorem id.

Minus accusantium est accusantium itaque dicta perferendis et. Voluptatem dolor consequatur perspiciatis recusandae voluptates at aliquam. Rem quidem ipsam rerum ut. Et dignissimos et est in.

Saepe in sunt quis ad necessitatibus qui nisi. Rerum perferendis qui voluptatibus. Maxime non esse voluptatem ea animi doloribus odit vel. Est veniam in sunt.

Consequatur rem officia placeat earum eveniet ea est. Aut explicabo cumque quis beatae est neque. Itaque aperiam impedit et fuga totam officiis illum consequatur. Nemo ad consequatur rerum. Cum accusamus quo enim nemo. Quia et fugit sit. Qui et provident nostrum omnis unde saepe.

I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was blaming you.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”