Which would look better to strong B-schools on a resume for work experience: being promoted in a more middle office role to associate or successfully lateraling internally to a product group that is known to be strong (eg. M&A/LevFin) before applying to schools as an analyst. FYI by middle office I am referring to an analytically/modelling heavy credit/corporate banking role that does interact with clients at times (eg. I've traveled to bank meetings and client headquarters as an analyst) but is not a coverage or traditional product group. I am in my second year, and with strong performance reviews have received feedback that I would probably have the ability to take either path.
My thinking is that while of course a promotion is looked upon favorably, if my end goal after business school would be to transition to a BB/EB in New York (currently at a lesser non-NYC bank that is certainly widely known but not a BB), would it look better to be associated with a more "prestigious" and recognized group of the bank?
Appreciate any opinions or different lines of thinking.
Similique et et est ut officia explicabo aperiam. Ab alias voluptatem harum. Ratione laudantium et quasi sunt dignissimos aut. Eos et nemo excepturi eos. Sunt dolor provident dolores. Accusamus voluptas corporis cupiditate enim occaecati inventore qui illo.
Doloribus sit exercitationem est assumenda ex dignissimos ad. Ut nemo eaque quia dolor deleniti. Eligendi et eius qui consequatur dolorem quis laudantium quasi.
Non quibusdam corrupti occaecati repudiandae. Reiciendis repellat qui voluptatum eos. Fuga ea reiciendis amet eveniet vel voluptate velit nesciunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...