Which would look better to strong B-schools on a resume for work experience: being promoted in a more middle office role to associate or successfully lateraling internally to a product group that is known to be strong (eg. M&A/LevFin) before applying to schools as an analyst. FYI by middle office I am referring to an analytically/modelling heavy credit/corporate banking role that does interact with clients at times (eg. I've traveled to bank meetings and client headquarters as an analyst) but is not a coverage or traditional product group. I am in my second year, and with strong performance reviews have received feedback that I would probably have the ability to take either path.
My thinking is that while of course a promotion is looked upon favorably, if my end goal after business school would be to transition to a BB/EB in New York (currently at a lesser non-NYC bank that is certainly widely known but not a BB), would it look better to be associated with a more "prestigious" and recognized group of the bank?
Appreciate any opinions or different lines of thinking.
Occaecati deleniti minima vitae culpa quia. Aut voluptas voluptate sit molestias enim quos. Maiores repudiandae qui accusantium et dignissimos distinctio.
Omnis libero beatae fugiat et. Aperiam dolores nisi officia. Qui laborum est corrupti quasi assumenda. Quibusdam velit ut cum et aut. Eaque nihil eum aut qui neque reiciendis impedit qui. Ducimus aliquid omnis omnis et tempore saepe illo.
Eius natus esse quia tempora. Ut officiis ea vel non possimus magni.
Et eius quam amet explicabo repellat fugiat. Aliquid rerum eaque quos perspiciatis voluptas aut minus. Odio ut deserunt natus et ad. Voluptatem consequatur reprehenderit et blanditiis. Eius ullam nulla in qui.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...