(LSE vs UVA vs UCLA) Help an International Student Choose Undergrad
Hello everyone, I'm a Chinese international student and I was recently accepted into:
LSE Bsc Accounting and Finance
UVA Economics (Will apply McIntire)
UCLA Business Economics
Cost is not a factor. I have concerns about visa challenges both in the US and UK, and would like maximize my chances of staying in the UK/US after graduation. Trying to break into IB.
LSE
Pros: One of the top targets for London, Brand recognition in HK IB if I need to fall back
Cons: Read that recruiting in UK is quite random, benefit of attending a target diminishing (?), hard to break in without knowing European languages.
UVA
Pros: Low target for US IB, lots of alumni in IB
Cons: risk of not getting into McIntire, less international recognition.
UCLA
Pros: international recognition, T20, less competition for IB within the school
Cons: Semi-non target for IB
Any advice would be appreciated!
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a breakdown to help you decide:
LSE (BSc Accounting and Finance)
Pros: - LSE is a top-tier target for London IB recruiting, with strong brand recognition in Europe and Asia (especially Hong Kong). - The program's prestige and alumni network can open doors to top firms in London, which is a major IB hub. - If you decide to return to Asia, LSE's brand carries significant weight in Hong Kong and other financial centers.
Cons: - UK IB recruiting can be unpredictable, and the process may favor candidates with European language skills for certain roles. - Visa challenges in the UK post-graduation could be a concern, though the Graduate Route visa allows you to stay for two years after completing your degree.
UVA (Economics, with plans to apply to McIntire)
Pros: - UVA is a "low target" for US IB, meaning it has a solid alumni presence in the industry, particularly on the East Coast. - McIntire School of Commerce is highly regarded, and if admitted, it significantly boosts your chances of breaking into IB. - The US market offers more IB opportunities compared to the UK, and UVA's alumni network is strong in the US.
Cons: - Admission to McIntire is competitive, and not getting in could limit your IB prospects. - UVA has less international recognition compared to LSE or UCLA, which could be a factor if you plan to work outside the US.
UCLA (Business Economics)
Pros: - UCLA is a globally recognized T20 university, which can be advantageous for international mobility. - The West Coast location provides access to tech-focused IB roles and other finance opportunities in Los Angeles and San Francisco. - Less competition for IB roles within the school compared to LSE or UVA.
Cons: - UCLA is considered a semi-target for IB, meaning you'll need to network aggressively to secure top roles. - The alumni network in IB is not as strong as LSE or UVA, particularly on the East Coast.
Key Considerations:
Location and Visa Challenges:
IB Recruiting:
Backup Options:
Recommendation:
Ultimately, your decision should align with your long-term career goals and preferred work location.
Sources: LBS vs UCL vs Imperial for IB, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/school/admitted-to-imperial-college-business-school-msc-finance-and-lse-msc-finance-for-2019?customgpt=1, Profile Evaluation: MSc in Finance at LBS, LSE, Imperial, Said or MIT, European Master in Finance programmes (pre-experience), https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/school/uk-master-in-finance-advice?customgpt=1
R u from mainland? LSE easy. Recuriting in HK would be much easier. And speaking mandarin is useful in EMEA as well unlike other asian languages.
Reiciendis sunt error molestias nemo expedita. Quia unde sed occaecati error. Voluptatem nam debitis quis dignissimos. Dolores qui repellat repudiandae est eveniet.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...