Oxford vs Chicago Booth
Master's in econ at oxford vs MiF (finance) at booth ($$ scholarship though cost is relatively similar in absolute terms).
Looking to transition out of trad finance roles into the fintech startup space (hated my summers despite being good at the job).
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a breakdown to help you decide:
Oxford (Master's in Economics):
Chicago Booth (Master's in Finance with Scholarship):
Recommendation:
If your primary goal is to transition into the fintech startup space, Chicago Booth seems like the better fit. Its practical focus, strong alumni network, and proximity to the US fintech ecosystem align well with your aspirations. However, if you're leaning towards a more academic or research-oriented path, or if you plan to work in Europe/UK, Oxford could be a better choice.
Sources: School Decision for Investment Management: Booth / Columbia ($$) / MIT Sloan?, European Master in Finance programmes (pre-experience), https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/school/uk-master-in-finance-advice?customgpt=1, Which masters to choose?, Finance PhD vs. Applied Math MSc
bump
bump
you told us 0 info.
your citizenship, undergrad, previous work experience, which country do you want to work in etc etc.
On face, a mif is prob going to be the better option into fintech than econ, but a degree is not really a prereq to fintech either. consider also the booth mif is only in its second year.
Agreed. More info on your situation would make this easier to opine on, but fintech is a different animal than tradfi for sure. What role would you be interested in pursuing within the fintech firm? What did you do before?
Illum voluptatem harum et recusandae perspiciatis. Esse in quia quo aut. Non qui perspiciatis a in molestiae in sed.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...