Target MS programs for buyside/prop trading in the UK

As the title says, can someone shed some light on the top math finance programs in the UK that are target for quant investing/trading roles in the buyside/prop trading firms? Thanks

 

Quant hedge funds tend to recruit from Imperial, Cambridge, Oxford and Warwick, near-exclusively (in descending order). These are very often PhD type hires - you can go on LinkedIN and look at some of the backgrounds. Some more quantitative courses at LSE and UCL will also get a look in. 

Others might correct me, but most of the people I know who have gone this route are just maths/physics or the like rather than having the finance element - they generally self-learn that. This is somewhat evidenced by the fact that none of the four target universities above have especially good business schools compared to LBS/M7/INSEAD. The course itself doesn't really seem to make much of a difference as long as it's highly quantitative and you've also learnt your technicals. 

 

qwerty_mbb

Thanks for responding.
For context, I'll be switching countries if I join a program in the UK. I'm already a few years out of undergrad and I work as a quant in a bank. My plan is to do a 4 month pre Masters intern in a boutique quant investing fund before the masters. I've shifted my focus from the US to the UK since the latter now has better employment immigration policies.I understand that the MSc MathFin curriculum might actually be more relevant for banks but not for the work that quant HFs do, but I'm not sure what other options I have to get my foot in the door. Would love to get some ideas or other routes for this. Thanks! 

Your background is good. I have seen a few people get in to these funds out of undergrad (or at least MSci, the integrated masters) so it's definitely possible. Structured recruiting for them is generally rare and it seems to be more of a case of turning up at campus presentations or networking outside of campus. The Oxford FinMath looks pretty useful - and if you don't break HF recruitment it will likely position you better for other finance roles than another solely STEM degree. Some other options:

MSc Mathematics and Finance, Imperial - To me it looks a little more mathematically rigorous than Oxford's? Imperial also has their Institute of Quantitative Finance where there will likely be interesting research opportunities (and potentially placement/referrals from the professors there). 

MSc Financial Mathematics, LSE - Like a lot of LSE masters, it's very, very competitive to get in (3.5% acceptance rate). I've actually heard quite good things about the LSE Maths Department, but I'd fear that it will play second fiddle in placements to Cambridge and Imperial. Have a search on LinkedIN for what alumni have gone on to do. I'm guessing that it's more likely to lead to a similar role to the one that you have now than HFs.  

MSc Mathematical Finance, Warwick - Warwick, despite being virtually unknown outside of the UK, is top tier for maths and generally places very well for finance (full target, but probably the lowest of the six full targets). Might be worth a look, although being out of London will harm you for informal networking. 

MSc Financial Mathematics, UCL - Worth applying for, but Imperial > UCL by far for anything mathsy in a London university. Would probably be an uphill struggle to place at a HF from it. 

I can't find any course at Cambridge which matches what you're looking for, unfortunately. To me, Oxford and Imperial are going to be your best bets. I've heard good things about the Princeton and MIT courses. To be honest, they're likely more competitive to get into than the UK ones. That said, I'm not sure they'd be actually what you need for HFs - whilst mathematically rigorous, they're still more finance focused than the courses above. 

With regards to your specific question about chances, it's really not my area so unfortunately I can't be of much use. The few people I do know in this space are highly intelligent, generally graduated in the top 5% of their class, and are more "maths" people than "finance" people to be honest. I think you've got a reasonable chance, but it's probably not the degree that will make or break you here. Instead, it's likely going to be your grades and most importantly, networking - which yes, goes against the standard "structured" and relatively meritocratic recruiting of other London finance roles. There are some exceptions to this though. D.E. Shaw, for example, have online applications and have been doing several on-campus/on-Zoom sessions at COWI (Cambridge, Oxford, Warwick, Imperial, probably a useful term for you to be aware of as it's basically the top four maths institutions in the UK). 

 

Oh I see. Then I think your list might make more sense than a math program. I'm not very familiar with the quant industry so I'm not sure how a MS in Math + CFA compares with a Master in FinMath/FinEng. If I was in OP's shoes and had no financial constraint I would probably have done Oxford MSc Financial Economics + Cambridge Part III haha, that's 2 years but you'll have a summer in between for an internship.

 

SLB00 @Ryan Finance" 

I'm looking at FinMath programs and not pure Math programs, purely because I'm sure I want to be in Finance, specifically in the (quant) investing/trading space. Maybe if I were born and brought up in the UK, I would've known better, but from outside UK, especially from South Asia, it feels a little intimidating to take up a pure Math program and not a FinMath program if I'm sure about staying in Finance. (intimidating not because I am scared of math, in fact I love it and had top grades in it in undergrad; rather because I'm not sure how to justify why I'm choosing pure Math over FinMath). 

 

Aut officia quis architecto ullam at ut cupiditate. Quia deserunt aspernatur dolorum. Accusamus hic est perspiciatis sit fugiat voluptas non.

Eos eos beatae sint veritatis possimus voluptate et aut. Consequatur omnis rem aut occaecati dignissimos aut reprehenderit sunt. Nihil beatae doloribus cum asperiores.

Dolorem alias consectetur nemo. Consequatur sunt eum autem accusantium. Eum debitis porro voluptatum ut perspiciatis ex est neque. Temporibus aspernatur et vel ipsam sit vitae error nisi. Provident voluptas omnis impedit iste doloribus facilis delectus.

Molestiae iste rem molestiae quibusdam ex. Debitis neque sed ex.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”