URGENT: Calculus 3 vs. Intro to Excel

This summer I can take either

Cal 3 (multivariable) intensively or "Intro to Spreadsheets" intensively

Cal 3 would be a killer for the summer

I feel that Excel might be more practical, but it's not exactly a financial modelling course

Any advice?

16 Comments
 

Depends what you wanna do my man. Most finance jobs don't need Calc III. If you wanna get into IBanking / Corp. Finance / Equity Research definitely go for the Excel course. I took a Basic Excel course, and found learning to model fairly easy because I knew Excel pretty well.

"Some things are believed because they are demonstrably true. But many other things are believed simply because they have been asserted repeatedly—and repetition has been accepted as a substitute for evidence." - Thomas Sowell
 

Any math class will enable you to think more critically and abstractly. However, you have to put forth the effort to LEARN and UNDERSTAND the material. If you just memorize the mechanics for a good grade, what was the point? May have taken some geography class and aced it.

The difference between successful people and others is largely a habit - a controlled habit of doing every task better, faster and more efficiently.
 

IDK if you aren't doing any math beyond calc 3 then I'd actually say do the excel course. Calc III is definitely the most useless of the calculus series in terms of learning new/useful information. Partial derivatives you could easily teach yourself, lagrange multipliers and maximizing in more than one variable is self teachable also and most everything else is useless in everyone's(save an engineers) life.

Think you'll ever need to know how to calculate how much liquid can pass through an object, or how to do a triple integral to solve for the area of 1/4 sphere? Calc 3 is not a math course with any real critical thinking, it simply uses what you already know and takes it into functions of more than one variable. I also took differential equations while taking calc 3 so it isn't even necessary for that. Long story short, if you're not doing analysis on manifolds anytime soon this class is pretty useless.

 
Best Response
jkteconIDK if you aren't doing any math beyond calc 3 then I'd actually say do the excel course. Calc III is definitely the most useless of the calculus series in terms of learning new/useful information. Partial derivatives you could easily teach yourself, lagrange multipliers and maximizing in more than one variable is self teachable also and most everything else is useless in everyone's(save an engineers) life.

Think you'll ever need to know how to calculate how much liquid can pass through an object, or how to do a triple integral to solve for the area of 1/4 sphere? Calc 3 is not a math course with any real critical thinking, it simply uses what you already know and takes it into functions of more than one variable. I also took differential equations while taking calc 3 so it isn't even necessary for that. Long story short, if you're not doing analysis on manifolds anytime soon this class is pretty useless.

are you high or something? Calc 3 is the most important calculus course. It is used in statistics, game theory, economics, etc... The reason you take Calc 1 and 2 is so that you can finally take Calc 3.

 
lifeofpurpose
jkteconIDK if you aren't doing any math beyond calc 3 then I'd actually say do the excel course. Calc III is definitely the most useless of the calculus series in terms of learning new/useful information. Partial derivatives you could easily teach yourself, lagrange multipliers and maximizing in more than one variable is self teachable also and most everything else is useless in everyone's(save an engineers) life.

Think you'll ever need to know how to calculate how much liquid can pass through an object, or how to do a triple integral to solve for the area of 1/4 sphere? Calc 3 is not a math course with any real critical thinking, it simply uses what you already know and takes it into functions of more than one variable. I also took differential equations while taking calc 3 so it isn't even necessary for that. Long story short, if you're not doing analysis on manifolds anytime soon this class is pretty useless.

are you high or something? Calc 3 is the most important calculus course. It is used in statistics, game theory, economics, etc... The reason you take Calc 1 and 2 is so that you can finally take Calc 3.

HAHAHA
 
lifeofpurpose
jkteconIDK if you aren't doing any math beyond calc 3 then I'd actually say do the excel course. Calc III is definitely the most useless of the calculus series in terms of learning new/useful information. Partial derivatives you could easily teach yourself, lagrange multipliers and maximizing in more than one variable is self teachable also and most everything else is useless in everyone's(save an engineers) life.

Think you'll ever need to know how to calculate how much liquid can pass through an object, or how to do a triple integral to solve for the area of 1/4 sphere? Calc 3 is not a math course with any real critical thinking, it simply uses what you already know and takes it into functions of more than one variable. I also took differential equations while taking calc 3 so it isn't even necessary for that. Long story short, if you're not doing analysis on manifolds anytime soon this class is pretty useless.

are you high or something? Calc 3 is the most important calculus course. It is used in statistics, game theory, economics, etc... The reason you take Calc 1 and 2 is so that you can finally take Calc 3.

Different schools treat calc 3 differently. Some schools combine multivariable and vector calc into Calc 3 and others split them into Calc 3 and 4. Maybe that's where the confusion lies here. Because the vector calculus portion of Calc 3 has been completely useless to me in all my years of college as a math major, although it is used extensively in physics. Multivariable calc (which is very very easy) is useful for probability/statistics, economics, etc. Vector calc is not.
 

Hang on, what's your major? Surely an econ or finance student at a decent school is required to take calc 3 at some point, right?

 

Surely? Economics is a social science, thus it is rare that an undergrad has to take multivariable calculus to graduate. Financial math is filled with so many highly theoretical results that it defeats the point of studying the subject at its basic level.

So I actually hope students aren't forced to learn the mathematical sides of these subjects, as they may never be able to separate theory from reality. And to answer your question no many (probably safe to say most) decent schools don't require calc III to graduate.

 
jkteconSurely? Economics is a social science, thus it is rare that an undergrad has to take multivariable calculus to graduate. Financial math is filled with so many highly theoretical results that it defeats the point of studying the subject at its basic level.

So I actually hope students aren't forced to learn the mathematical sides of these subjects, as they may never be able to separate theory from reality. And to answer your question no many (probably safe to say most) decent schools don't require calc III to graduate.

Where did you go to school?? At my school and all of my friends' that I can recall we were required to take Calc III for economics. You couldn't possibly take intermediate micro without knowing partial derivatives and multivariate optimization. Similarly for econometrics, you can't really learn OLS without understanding matrix math and other calc 2/3 topics. Econ may be a "social science" by classification, but any real econ work requires moderately heavy math.
 

NO kidding and most schools don't require it. Look up even Harvard econ's required courses. Math in economics is a tool which in all actuality is not required to understand the subject. partial differentiation and optimization like I said are so damn easy to understand you could take max 2 weeks out of a course to explain it in full detail if it was so required. These are not new concepts, it's the same old concepts being presented so I would say you wasted a lot of time taking calc III if you only needed these two fairly simple concepts. Calc III is for engineers for the most part who need good understanding of flux and divergence, or calculations of 3d volumes and surface areas.

It is useful for mathematicians but at its undergraduate presentation most times the rigor isn't even there as much as Calc II. If OP wants to go to Econ grad school or study math in more depth then sure study Calc III, but the course will not be much in terms of useful applications.

 

Well I studied at two different universities. In the first we had just two calc courses, however we took multivariable in the second course (all engineers had calc at high school so the program was pretty dense). However, when i transferred to the second university, they considered those 2 courses as equivalent to three courses. I think the states follows the 3 course calculus curricula if I am not wrong since most people dont study calculus at high school.

thurnis is right though, the real use of calc 3 is the multivariable calc which is useful for many other disciplines. However if you covered that in calc 2 there is no need for calc 3.

 

Commodi corporis ea fugiat quae. Rem quaerat nemo ratione corporis molestiae. Nihil ratione quidem corrupti quidem saepe molestiae ex. Repellat quis perspiciatis accusantium illo assumenda beatae laboriosam. Qui nulla ipsa quo aut voluptatem. Eos voluptatem quos voluptas ut delectus totam dolores voluptas. Distinctio molestiae reprehenderit sed animi et voluptatum.

Iure ullam qui culpa dignissimos autem laboriosam. Earum voluptatem inventore expedita ducimus qui aut inventore explicabo. Itaque aut iste et veniam quidem. Quos et corporis corrupti perferendis sit cum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”