1L/2L vs Unitranche

Gents have you come across transactions where a borrower evaluates the option of either 1l/2l Loans or a Unitranche facility? 
what are the pros / cons when deciding which solution to go with - is there an overwhelming tendency to go with 1 of these 2 options?

Appreciate any insight you can share mates.

 
Most Helpful

Unitranche is usually going to be easier logistically & have more certainty of close - only one lead investor needs to sign off, there isn't an intercreditor to worry about, and legal docs can generally be much simpler. The tradeoff & analysis between the two is going to be based on (1) cost of capital and (2) amount of debt available.

All else being equal, pricing will look like 1L less than Uni less than 2L, so you have to check the blended (weighted) cost of the 1L & 2L vs. the unitranche standalone. The other factor here is that you may or may not be able to get more or less debt in a 1L / 2L structure vs. uni.

In some situations, a 2L investor will want to limit the amount of 1L debt ahead of them to ensure they have some asset coverage, which limits the amount of total debt. in other situations, it might be the opposite, where bringing in a 2L lender will allow you more debt vs. a unitranche facility since some 2L lenders don't care about asset coverage while the uni guys might.

Ultimately, the analysis will revolve around the weighted cost of capital and the amount of debt available.

 

Thanks mate appreciate the thoughts above - can anyone add on? For example on whether typically 1l/2l debt will result in higher leverage / better blended pricing, or vice versa?

Also, assuming a single bank can provide both 1l/2l, how does that change the dynamics? Would they effectively behave as one lender as both divisions within the same bank will be more cohesive?

 

How are most of these lenders determining cost of capital for these loan issuing companies? Hypothetically let’s say that you have a $300-$400 mil EV company thats overall “moderate” for risk at that size (like a food/soft goods distributor, something conventional in terms of operating model). Is there a quick and dirty way to get a weighted average cost of capital proxy for something like that from the Ladner perspective? I mean I’m just curious if unitranche or 1L/2L lenders asses that differently than just a conventional CAPM? Is there anything unique about how CAPM inputs are determined compared to like a basic middle market sell side equity deal? Thanks in advance.

 

you’re overthinking this. lenders just look at comps and slap a premium/discount on it depending on the credit.

for 2L pricing, in my experience the borrower / advisor is often solving for a target blended rate, so compared to a unitranche you have a cheaper 1L but a more expensive 2L, if the reason you’re doing a 1L/2L is because you can’t find a unitranche anchor. if you’re simply maximizing debt capacity then often 2L is a structurally subordinated tranche (read: non-IG) that commands a significant premium, again based off comps

everything is comps. finance is one big circularity.

Array
 

Probably one of the 2 reasons cited above, which are definitely interlinking reasons. 1) they either could not build a book (enough financing size) under a 1L/2L subordinated structure or 2) the rates offered were not enticing as in a uni structure.

Array
 

Consequatur nesciunt magni ut. Unde quam illo mollitia dignissimos quia. Et sunt harum est perspiciatis voluptatem fuga. Libero velit sed vel sint sit iusto.

Sint reiciendis minus ut consequatur odit eos. Eligendi est et velit ea voluptatem. Reprehenderit delectus architecto fuga aliquam. Qui odio repellat minima exercitationem.

Ugh the FBI still quotes the Dow... -Matt Levine

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”