17 Comments
 

Most of the compensation in this hypothetical is dependent on comp during the MD years, which isn't going to be normally distributed either. The question then is does an MD at GS make more than an MD at Evercore or Qatalyst or PJT on the average? Do we include founders of those EBs, some of whom are now billionaires or close to it? Probably not the most helpful way to think of where to do a career.

 
Dukha:

Most of the compensation in this hypothetical is dependent on comp during the MD years, which isn't going to be normally distributed either. The question then is does an MD at GS make more than an MD at Evercore or Qatalyst or PJT on the average? Do we include founders of those EBs, some of whom are now billionaires or close to it? Probably not the most helpful way to think of where to do a career.

I'll word it differently: Does an MD make more at a BB or an EB, in general?

 

My hunch would be that ebs are more lucrative over a career, simply because at junior levels comp is more generous and at senior levels ebs often distribute fee bonuses on an “eat what you kill” basis which is often what lures top deal makers there in the first place. However, as pointed out above, there are really too many variables to consider, vast differences when considering stock/option grants etc. Moral of the story is, get to the MD level first and land some big deals, you’ll do just fine for yourself at either place.

 
"Principal in PE - LBOs"

My hunch would be that ebs are more lucrative over a career, simply because at junior levels comp is more generous and at senior levels ebs often distribute fee bonuses on an "eat what you kill" basis which is often what lures top deal makers there in the first place. However, as pointed out above, there are really too many variables to consider, vast differences when considering stock/option grants etc. Moral of the story is, get to the MD level first and land some big deals, you'll do just fine for yourself at either place.

Ok, this helps. If I were to receive an EB and a BB offer, which do I chose, considering it's not GS/Evercore
 

Climbing the greasy pole to MD is a grind. Pick the place you’ll be most likely to thrive. Career earnings will be enormously skewed by deal fees as an MD so at this point your best bet is to pick the one you like best (people, team, culture, industry, etc). If you’re good wealth will follow. If you’re not it won’t matter what bank you’re at.

 

Most EBs pay 20-30% of deal fees to the originating MDs and most EBs pay all-cash. That said, you have the security blanket of financing to court your clients in BBs while you don't in EBs. So if you're just an average MD who leans a lot on your ability to fork out cheap credit to generate M&A fees...you aren't going to last long at an EB. If you're able to generate deals just by virtue of providing smart advice and being great at sales, an EB would make you significantly more. Think about it; 1.5% fee on a billion dollar M&A is 15 mm and you keep up $3-5mm of that in cash. $3mm is more than what the average BB MD makes all-in, let alone in cash. And that's assuming you close one solitary deal a year at an EB.

 
"s.ratnasw"

Most EBs pay 20-30% of deal fees to the originating MDs and most EBs pay all-cash. That said, you have the security blanket of financing to court your clients in BBs while you don't in EBs. So if you're just an average MD who leans a lot on your ability to fork out cheap credit to generate M&A fees...you aren't going to last long at an EB. If you're able to generate deals just by virtue of providing smart advice and being great at sales, an EB would make you significantly more. Think about it; 1.5% fee on a billion dollar M&A is 15 mm and you keep up $3-5mm of that in cash. $3mm is more than what the average BB MD makes all-in, let alone in cash. And that's assuming you close one solitary deal a year at an EB.

So basically, there is more potential for crazy earnings at am EB, but a BB is a safer bet?
 
Most Helpful

Im going to focus on senior bankers, because that is where the distinction really starts to show. The short answer is - it depends, and different bankers are suited for different platforms

The promotion path to MD, and the ability to generate revenue is more structured / "easier" at an BB because you have the bank platform and brand name to lean on. You can be an "average" MD and still generate revenue by virtue of legacy institutional relationships or financing arrangements. Companies always require capital and there usually plenty of financing fees to go around. A large part of a BB MD's annual budget may be attributable to ECM, DCM and other random treasury work like hedges or swaps (which can pay very well). Companies often dont hire a banker for an equity raise based on his/her individual talents - it is based on the bank's execution and distribution capabilities.

Unique M&A or structuring ideas are where a banker's talents may start to shine, but financing and global capabilities can also help win M&A work - for example, if your bank is the lead arranger on a company's term loan B , you are likely well suited to win future M&A business. or you may have a great APAC healthcare team which you can show to your client to help you win cross-border mandates. A big part of the BB MD role is showcasing and delivering the bank's global capabilities to your clients. This helps you win and there is less individual pressure on you, but on the flip side, you are sharing those fees with more mouths at the bank. There are plenty of MDs like this who can reasonably expect to earn $1-2 million per year. There are of course some very successful group heads who earn more (e.g. $5-10mm)

At the EBs, it is much more difficult to win business (or get promoted) because a) clients are not hiring the bank, they are hiring the individual(s), and b) you have no financing capabilities to help. But of course, it is direct drive revenue and "you eat what you kill". If a banker is successful on an EB platform its because clients genuinely like them and/or they have great market intel and/or unique transaction or structuring ideas. There are plenty of MDs who move from the BBs (including GS/MS) to EBs and vastly overestimate how much of their previous success was due to the bank name vs. their own capabilities or ideas. Then of course, there are the rainmakers who can crush it on any platform and they are compensated very well on an EB platform. The MD compensation at the EBs is a lot more variable, and there may be years where an MD can earn sub$1mm and then other years where they can earn $10mm+. M&A fees can often be more volatile than financing fees (i.e. a lot of M&A deals dont end up getting to the finish line

To recap, I'd say senior banker comp is higher at the EBs, but there is a lot more variability and the distribution is a lot wider due to a bunch of rainmakers (there are guys who are earning $20mm+) and some MDs who may be new to the EB platform who realize they cant win (=donuts)

The average comp at the BBs is lower, but the distribution is likely a lot tighter

 

Accusamus accusantium ut nihil harum voluptatum. Quia quos quia quod. Ipsum sed sed quis eum. Repellendus et rerum cumque nihil cumque. Et quia alias iusto esse voluptas fugit esse tenetur.

Error deleniti molestiae corrupti enim dicta quo iusto. Vero voluptas quo sed consequatur consequatur a voluptatem. Rem temporibus temporibus sequi. Voluptas sunt ut in aut. Repellendus laudantium a nobis sed non tempore.

Illum molestiae consequatur dolorum voluptatem eos. Sed vel omnis sed id maiores sint at. Vitae sequi fuga accusantium delectus. Aut nihil eos non quas quaerat tempore doloremque. Exercitationem consectetur assumenda culpa iure. Neque natus quo porro ad error in. Quia dolore quia numquam facere blanditiis libero.

Sunt est qui et omnis nihil dicta est odio. Fugiat est quia suscipit molestiae quod ut dolore. Sapiente deleniti deserunt cumque sed vitae. Vero id necessitatibus sequi inventore. Unde eos eligendi minus adipisci earum ut. Qui autem tempore animi nulla.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”