Difficulty Check

Need a favor from the community. Was interviewing a guy today and asked him a few intermediate options questions. Since he failed to answer any of them, I wanted to check if people find these questions overly difficult.

(1) When would you early ex an American call? Is there any uncertainty and how does it manifest? Is there a situation when you would early-X an American put?

(2) Why is it dangerous to delta-hedge a far-OTM options position? Which would would be more dangerous, long or short?

(3) Could you imagine a situation where a call will have delta greater than a 100%?

It would be really awesome if you can PM me the answers. I promise to post the right one here tomorrow, but I really would like to figure out how many people answer these right and what level they felt these question are.

 

hmm. I only took option classes in undergrad, dont really use them professionally (cash equities instead), that being said the answer of the top of my head would be...

  1. never ex early...would be throwing away the time value of the option.
  2. wasnt aware it was dangerous to hedge a far OTM option position...thought about this one, couldnt come up with a good answer. if i had to guess id say it has to do with the weak relationship of delta to price when its so far OTM. id imagine being short would be more dangerous as it allows for unlimited upside of the security. 3/ i cant imagine a delta on a call greater than 100%..i thought 100 was the max.
 

I'm not going to go back through my old derivatives notes from undergrad but I believe there is a situation where it as advantageous to exercise an (American I believe) option early.

 
buysidebandit:
These are way too hard for an undergrad imo.

1 is easy 2a is tricky but 2b is easy 3 i have no idea

for reference, i'm a graduating senior who rotated on an equity derivatives desk

The guy claims to have worked on an options trading desk overseas, so I assumed he knows something. The first two questions are tricky and can be discussed in depth, especially the American options ones, lot's of corner cases and things to think about. The last one is definitely very tricky, though I asked it first assuming he's pretty advanced.

I have a friend who lives in the country, and it's supposed to be an hour from 42nd Street. A lie! The only thing that's an hour from 42nd Street is 43rd Street!
 
Best Response

Those are hard questions

  1. You will exercise an american call early to get the dividend, which must be higher than the interest rate earned on the strike price
  2. Short because of pin risk - gamma is greatest otm, if there is a large move around the strike heading into expiration it can be difficult to hedge
  3. I know there are some cases where digitals can have a delta greater than 1. If a digital call is deeply ITM it's delta is greater than 1; it's payout is fixed but the underlying shares held continue to gain value as the market rallies, so we need to sell more shares (higher hedge ratios) to be flat detla. Let me know if any is unclear
 
long_vega:
3. I know there are some cases where digitals can have a delta greater than 1. If a digital call is deeply ITM it's delta is greater than 1; it's payout is fixed but the underlying shares held continue to gain value as the market rallies, so we need to sell more shares (higher hedge ratios) to be flat detla. Let me know if any is unclear
Once you start dealing with exotics, you can have all sorts of wacky deltas, indeed. Digitals are obvious (a digital will have infinite delta at the strike), look-backs can have deltas over one etc. At the interview, I was asking specifically about vanilla options, though (should I have specified it in the OP). In theory, it should never happen, but in real life it happens all the time due to funding - e.g. an OTC option that's has different funding on the underlying hedge (libor) and premium discounting (OIS, usually) will start showing deltas greater than unity (because you have to hedge the funding shortfall) once they trade at intrinsic.
long_vega:
2. Short because of pin risk - gamma is greatest otm, if there is a large move around the strike heading into expiration it can be difficult to hedge
The answer I was looking for was "for an long option that's really far OTM, you can easily lose money on both the option and the hedge". For example, you long a put, so you buy some stock against it. Next thing you know, the stock sells off but does not reach your strike - so you lose money on the hedge and on the option. It's one of those experience-based things - most people in the know end up managing far wings at a lower vol or (like myself) mark these things down to zero and treat them as lottery tickets. The second question was a discussion point, more than anything else.
long_vega:
1. You will exercise an american call early to get the dividend, which must be higher than the interest rate earned on the strike price
Yup, you early-X an American call when the value of the dividend exceeds the value of the residual optionality. That's the "easy answer" and the dude managed that OK. There is another layer - there are funding reasons to early-ex (e.g. if the borrow rate is very high, you might want to collapse your hedge against the box). Funding could also be a reason to early-X your puts when your margin interest is different from the interest on cash.
I have a friend who lives in the country, and it's supposed to be an hour from 42nd Street. A lie! The only thing that's an hour from 42nd Street is 43rd Street!
 

Saw this too late to respond, but thanks for this, these were fun to think about. A few questions if you have time: 1. Got the put side, but was curious about the call side since in an ideal black scholes world where you could sell the option, the price would include the dividend and would generally be the better choice since you also don’t give up the extrinsic value (is it the case in practice that you often can’t find someone to take the other side in time to get the dividend?). 2. Got this one too, but I can see a possible confusion since there might be some path dependency to the positions (e.g. the argument clearly makes sense to me if the questions is whether you should go long an otm option and hedge it, but seems less valid relative to the short side if you imagine that you’re already long the option ). 3. Didn’t get this one at all, but if we assume sticky deltas and a steep enough skew then this seems possible (is there some no arbitrage argument for why this doesn’t make sense or is it just impractical).

Btw I’m a quant who used to price some slightly exotic commodity options so the put funding stuff was included in the first thing I read on American options, dividends were a non factor, and the not hedging long otm options came up in practice a couple of times.

 

These seem reasonable to me for anyone with experience.

I got about half right and I’ve never read any options book. I should know this stuff and can’t tell you why I’ve never done it.

I’ve traded options like a guy whose naturally good at math would but never studied. So running some sort of probability thru my head..... basically I’m likely giving away a small edge to citadel or whichever shop is filling me.

Usually betting on something the market maker isn’t. Sometimes right sometimes wrong.

 

I’m sorry for my ignorance but I don’t know what any of this is. Was this an interview for S&T at the undergrad level or something else? Definitely not IB right? Sorry I’m not much help I’m just someone who has been preparing and haven’t learned any of these technicals, but this stuff sounds interesting? Is it quant related?

 
RocketToTheMoon:
I’m sorry for my ignorance but I don’t know what any of this is. Was this an interview for S&T at the undergrad level or something else? Definitely not IB right? Sorry I’m not much help I’m just someone who has been preparing and haven’t learned any of these technicals, but this stuff sounds interesting? Is it quant related?
I was interviewing a dude to be my gimp (junior volatility-trader-something-or-other). It is quant related, but I'd imagine most options traders would figure these questions out without any math.
I have a friend who lives in the country, and it's supposed to be an hour from 42nd Street. A lie! The only thing that's an hour from 42nd Street is 43rd Street!
 

Question 2 - easy Question 3 - hard, it's very specific and you need to know about that particular situation. Retarded question to ask in an interview, as it's either he knows or he doesn't, so you won't actually get an interesting discussion if he doesn't know or be able to test the candidate. Question 1 - there are multiple ways to answer this, not necessary technical ones. You have reasons outside the dividend to collapse out of a trade. So you can get to see the guys' thinking which is the idea behind an interview. And it's not just hedge against box bull shit - but simple as, you are pissing money away on some positions and need to meet a margin call. It's open to interesting thoughts.

 
Disjoint:
Question 1 - there are multiple ways to answer this, not necessary technical ones. You have reasons outside the dividend to collapse out of a trade. So you can get to see the guys' thinking which is the idea behind an interview. And it's not just hedge against box bull shit - but simple as, you are pissing money away on some positions and need to meet a margin call. It's open to interesting thoughts.
My former boss was very fond of this question and he would "develop" it into Bermudan swaption discusson (very non-trivial because of the term structure).

Anyways, I did ask the same three questions from a friend of mine who runs a large equity index book. He did not have any trouble, #3 included, but he certainly felt that all 3 were way above anything I can get for the money that I am hoping to pay.

I have a friend who lives in the country, and it's supposed to be an hour from 42nd Street. A lie! The only thing that's an hour from 42nd Street is 43rd Street!
 

My take on Question #2 is a little different. To get the answer you were going for, it is usually asked this way: is it possible to lose more than your premium by being long an option? This is a little sneaky, because the answer is "yes, by delta hedging it" and then you describe exactly the scenario of a delta-hedged OTM option expiring at the strike.

For me the reason not to delta-hedge a far OTM option is that you need to be way too clever for anything you do to actually work, namely:

  • You need to estimate your own vol. Tail options trade on some sticky price, and their market vol is a meaningless number. Consequently, so is their BS-delta

  • You need a view on spot-vol behavior. Even the "correct" BS-delta (using a "correct" vol), will be wrong, so you need a "smile delta". And who knows if that's the way the surface will actually behave

Now I'm gonna assume you don't traffic in tail options for a living (not sure what CIO would let you do that...) so if you do have a tail in your book it likely because it was a "reasonable" option that drifted away. That would imply your notional isn't all too big (was originally sized for reasonable greeks at a 50 or at least 20 delta). That would imply your Gamma on this thing is minuscule, so really, what's the point.. Especially if there's non-negligible bid/off on the underlying

What I'd do if it's near expiry is make an intuitive, non-model based decision. I'd look at and decide if it's 0-delta, 25-delta, or 50-delta. My bias would typically be toward 0-delta

Question #1 is fair and anyone looking for any vol related job should expect to be asked this. Question #3 is challenging, really a corner case for 100 delta options subject to stock-type settlement. Think a more interesting one is what is the delta of a long-dated, say 2yr, synthetic forward (long call, short put) on a stock index? Is it 100 / more / less?

 

Labore officiis autem placeat qui voluptatibus voluptatem sed. Architecto eos rerum mollitia quis reprehenderit veniam consequatur vero.

Debitis enim exercitationem illo qui. Nisi nihil repellat ut beatae.

Perspiciatis itaque blanditiis blanditiis illo aut aspernatur. Et excepturi et consequatur sequi adipisci doloremque. Error mollitia nihil autem deserunt consequatur neque. Tenetur in in odit aut sapiente soluta deleniti.

Eius veniam vero pariatur numquam hic quibusdam nostrum deleniti. Quidem expedita magni ipsum veniam tenetur fugit. Ex est accusamus ad doloremque. Nisi dolorum nemo nisi temporibus illum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”