Ever witnessed the wrong person getting the wrong job?
The recruiting process feels like there is no opportunities for a bullshitter to make his way into IB, but it must've happen.
Do you guys have any examples of someone making it in the industry but getting caught being worthless in the job?
Speaking of Interns primarily, but also post-MBA analysts/associates.
yea had some idiot from my school get in into a BB (no experience, asshole person), he was only asked behavioral and got into it because he was "diversity" even though he was fully white (his mother was from Spain). This diversity recruiting is making me want to like dick so I can qualify for an easier interview and have better chances.
Sexuality is a spectrum. There’s nothing stopping you from claiming to be bi. That being said, is that really how you want to break in?
no lol I was joking, I'm tired of people who are like.01 Hispanic and black, with daddy's money going in through diversity
Does being gay or slightly hispanic really raises your chances of getting in?
Here in Europe looking at the diversity of Analysts K doubt it would do much.
yea, they have a separate diversity requiting timeline here in the U.S, not only are they accelerated (straight to super day), its 99 percent behavioral and GPA requirement is low. therefore from today on wards, I am gay, I just gotta act gay now in my interviews.
You should come to Asia esp HK/China and see the hiring practices. Every single fucking new hire is a "princeling" nowadays. (The so called Sons and Daughters Program) Even after paying hundreds of millions of dollars in fines, banks seem to have no intention cleaning up their shit. It's like they don't give a f about what the regulators across the pacific ocean think.
You need find a new way to use golden parachute
damn now i know why i got dinged in hk lmao not princess enough:(
So true. Especially China mainland. From internship to full-time. I mean not only in Finance. We refer it as 'fight Dad'.
xswl
This Canadian at my firm makes me question the meaning of life with the elementary questions. Not even a Ivey or Queens hire either smfh, fuck Canada and their good poutine.
Waterloo, U of T, or Schulich?
Schulich
Probably one of those McGill
Happens all the time in London, thanks diversity hiring and spring weeks!
All the time and at all levels. I know it’s hard for many young’uns here to imagine but there is tons of deadweight/ineptitude at higher levels in this industry. They have ridden the tide or the coattails of someone else or mommy and daddy are/were a huge client/ran a country/state etc. That is, unfortunately, life.
Happens a lot.
From clueless juniors hired because of well-connected rich parents to just in time hires at hot HFs, have seen the wrong person get hired again and again.
The only thing is, they usually fizzle out. Most of the ppl who get there for the wrong reasons end up not making it. They didn’t put the effort into getting the job in the first place, don’t put what’s needed to get ahead and more than often blow themselves up.
The intrinsically motivated may initially take longer to get the right opportunity, but they have staying power.
Would confirm this. I currently really don’t like my job and at least to me it’s obvious who the best performers are, those that just are intrinsically interested in the niche asset class in a way I will never be.
A lot of college students (sophomores especially) look good on paper but are clueless about finance or what employers want.
I know a girl recently who had okay grades and good EC's but is a certified retard with financial concepts, and landed an internship at an AM place.
After a month, the MD fucked her off because she just turned out to be untrainable.
One of the more misguided assumptions I've seen on WSO, which is really saying something given the increase in shitters on the site since the pandemic and the anonymous role out. This assumption is wrong for a variety of reasons:
1) Target Recruiting - Both a case of interviewers getting starry eyed by the name and management being able to shirk blame when the new hire sucks. No one will blame you if the Harvard kid doesn't pan out. Putting your neck out for the state-school kid usually isn't worth it.
2) Diversity recruiting - horrible given the unequal quality of the hiring pools. Nothing else to add as it has been discussed at length.
3) Internal Hiring - managers can just fast track a hire and limit resource usage if hiring internally. This person is also less likely to leave . In big companies with limited visibility on other teams/functions, hiring managers occasionally don't understand the role the person is actually doing. A credit analyst can mean 100 different things at a place like BoA. technicals will weed out the real clowns but if the hiring process is expedited and the interviewers are bad, a moron can fall through the cracks.
4) Bullshitters Hire bullshitters - more of tier 3 bank issue, but plenty of people fail forward especially places where junior/mid level talent is not encouraged to stay/is not replaced (MBA hiring).
In 2016. Donald Trump for President of the United States.
I know an associate who didnt know how to create a DCF
Nesciunt adipisci impedit qui. In rerum mollitia et possimus harum sit. Ex tempora a distinctio aperiam ab consequatur hic. Et voluptas labore voluptas et fuga doloribus veritatis.
Doloremque vero quod id voluptatum et enim dolor. Ut a ea magni nihil aut fuga.
Sed dolorem harum placeat maxime nemo. Nisi et rerum quia et dolor. Perspiciatis doloribus rerum facilis maxime sit ducimus sunt distinctio. Praesentium commodi nostrum voluptatem. Id dignissimos minima sit ea. Nostrum ut asperiores similique minima non.
Dolores voluptatibus optio adipisci maiores commodi rerum autem magnam. Repudiandae inventore libero est vel eos. Aspernatur in excepturi molestiae nisi quasi et voluptatem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Dignissimos officia voluptatum cumque pariatur non velit magni repellat. Fugit aut et neque et in labore. Similique qui iusto corrupti assumenda sunt. Dicta repellat maxime expedita ut nobis modi quia. Eius molestias non quisquam velit.
Labore quia tenetur eius. Voluptas doloremque maiores provident reprehenderit. Odit id autem labore. Sint quibusdam non eum nobis dolores qui enim.
Et odit laborum similique voluptas autem saepe vitae enim. Ut facere quibusdam expedita aut adipisci ipsa. Ea ut nulla et ratione et. Earum nulla assumenda fugiat ipsum.
Animi rerum enim quo ut minus qui. Tempore aut natus eius voluptatem quia est corrupti. Omnis et molestiae consectetur quos porro debitis et.