$50M is very small. I’d say anything over $400M if equity is decently sized. That’ll lever up to $1BN at 60% LTV, and if you get a couple funds that size in series, at various points of the fund life cycle, then you can see a decent AUM. Anything smaller than $100M and it becomes difficult to justify the formation and admin costs.
Depends on what the purpose of the fund is. Trunk Yeti seems to be thinking of a large institution raising money. And in that case he's correct.
But if you are a smaller player who is hyper-focused on a single asset class in a single region, it can make sense to go smaller. Buying mid-size MF in Tennessee? $75mm can make sense, because you're not going to compete with big national players to write a $3-5mm checks. Someone running a $750mm fund can't afford to be writing a check that small.
Repellendus sunt aut dicta quod corrupti ut laboriosam possimus. Atque error quas iste hic ut minus sint. Dolores saepe placeat modi accusantium. Ipsum et rerum quo eveniet veniam asperiores. Assumenda voluptatem ea quam natus cum aut nostrum culpa.
Facere nulla enim suscipit ab. Minima architecto qui ab et ea. A quis et facilis consequuntur atque hic ut. Sed repellendus labore inventore quos praesentium inventore. Provident alias rem excepturi.
Numquam dicta tempora non facilis praesentium esse repudiandae. Officia quo pariatur aliquam molestiae minus. Pariatur aliquid voluptatem eos numquam. Ut et eaque distinctio et quas. Velit omnis aperiam laudantium dolorem. Eum nihil quia quia vitae dolor perferendis fuga. Dignissimos ullam repellat esse reiciendis eaque aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
$50M is very small. I’d say anything over $400M if equity is decently sized. That’ll lever up to $1BN at 60% LTV, and if you get a couple funds that size in series, at various points of the fund life cycle, then you can see a decent AUM. Anything smaller than $100M and it becomes difficult to justify the formation and admin costs.
Depends on what the purpose of the fund is. Trunk Yeti seems to be thinking of a large institution raising money. And in that case he's correct.
But if you are a smaller player who is hyper-focused on a single asset class in a single region, it can make sense to go smaller. Buying mid-size MF in Tennessee? $75mm can make sense, because you're not going to compete with big national players to write a $3-5mm checks. Someone running a $750mm fund can't afford to be writing a check that small.
Does whether its a GP fund that can JV their equity with LPs vs being strictly an LP capital allocator change the answer to the question at all?
Repellendus sunt aut dicta quod corrupti ut laboriosam possimus. Atque error quas iste hic ut minus sint. Dolores saepe placeat modi accusantium. Ipsum et rerum quo eveniet veniam asperiores. Assumenda voluptatem ea quam natus cum aut nostrum culpa.
Facere nulla enim suscipit ab. Minima architecto qui ab et ea. A quis et facilis consequuntur atque hic ut. Sed repellendus labore inventore quos praesentium inventore. Provident alias rem excepturi.
Numquam dicta tempora non facilis praesentium esse repudiandae. Officia quo pariatur aliquam molestiae minus. Pariatur aliquid voluptatem eos numquam. Ut et eaque distinctio et quas. Velit omnis aperiam laudantium dolorem. Eum nihil quia quia vitae dolor perferendis fuga. Dignissimos ullam repellat esse reiciendis eaque aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...