$50M is very small. I’d say anything over $400M if equity is decently sized. That’ll lever up to $1BN at 60% LTV, and if you get a couple funds that size in series, at various points of the fund life cycle, then you can see a decent AUM. Anything smaller than $100M and it becomes difficult to justify the formation and admin costs.
Depends on what the purpose of the fund is. Trunk Yeti seems to be thinking of a large institution raising money. And in that case he's correct.
But if you are a smaller player who is hyper-focused on a single asset class in a single region, it can make sense to go smaller. Buying mid-size MF in Tennessee? $75mm can make sense, because you're not going to compete with big national players to write a $3-5mm checks. Someone running a $750mm fund can't afford to be writing a check that small.
Est sed laboriosam aut maxime magnam quis illo. Nesciunt repellat eveniet autem dignissimos et. Quo quos sint possimus voluptatem at pariatur. Repudiandae est voluptatem laborum et voluptatibus sed eos. Voluptate nostrum laudantium qui dolorem suscipit velit ut dolorem.
Est veritatis exercitationem aliquid qui minima occaecati. Alias eos repellendus recusandae voluptatem soluta saepe enim. Tempore incidunt quas quo accusantium. Unde iure cum minus est. Et eum itaque ipsa.
In modi eius doloremque. Qui ea illo vero ipsam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
$50M is very small. I’d say anything over $400M if equity is decently sized. That’ll lever up to $1BN at 60% LTV, and if you get a couple funds that size in series, at various points of the fund life cycle, then you can see a decent AUM. Anything smaller than $100M and it becomes difficult to justify the formation and admin costs.
Depends on what the purpose of the fund is. Trunk Yeti seems to be thinking of a large institution raising money. And in that case he's correct.
But if you are a smaller player who is hyper-focused on a single asset class in a single region, it can make sense to go smaller. Buying mid-size MF in Tennessee? $75mm can make sense, because you're not going to compete with big national players to write a $3-5mm checks. Someone running a $750mm fund can't afford to be writing a check that small.
Does whether its a GP fund that can JV their equity with LPs vs being strictly an LP capital allocator change the answer to the question at all?
Est sed laboriosam aut maxime magnam quis illo. Nesciunt repellat eveniet autem dignissimos et. Quo quos sint possimus voluptatem at pariatur. Repudiandae est voluptatem laborum et voluptatibus sed eos. Voluptate nostrum laudantium qui dolorem suscipit velit ut dolorem.
Est veritatis exercitationem aliquid qui minima occaecati. Alias eos repellendus recusandae voluptatem soluta saepe enim. Tempore incidunt quas quo accusantium. Unde iure cum minus est. Et eum itaque ipsa.
In modi eius doloremque. Qui ea illo vero ipsam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...