HIG Capital Reputation?
Hi everyone - I know HIG has a bit of a scummy reputation but it seems like they've cleaned up their act in recent years. Anyone have thoughts on them going forward? Would a couple of years there be viewed as a black mark on your resume?
I think juniors aren’t get too negatively impacted by the stigma (have worked with a few of them), but they’ve all said it’s frustrating to do lots of work to put in the low priced bids when the chances of any one deal going through are very small.
Following
Does the Chicago office only have the Whitehorse team? Or does PE also sit in Chicago?
No PE in Chicago. Just Credit (Whitehorse) and one Growth Equity principal.
Also, note that there are four different equity funds under the HIG umbrella. Growth, LBO, Middle Market, and Advantage. Each has an EBITDA and structuring sweet spot.
Does their credit group also pay below street? Have heard things about PE group paying low
"Would a couple of years there be viewed as a black mark on your resume?" As in, recruiting for other PE roles (second associate stint post-MBA) will be harder?
Absolutely not. As others have commented, HIG is a very solid UMM shop that has a negative reputation for being a sweatshop and bidding very low for assets. You likely still need to be at a BB or EB to get an offer.
Nope. Multiple people from MMs have gone on to be successful associates there.
not true. my mm usually sends about 2 a year
Met some alumni from my school that went to MM like WB/JEF that ended up at HIG. Def not EB/BB requirement neccesary
They're still bottom-feeders (and don't pay juniors very well), but I've heard that culture's improved somewhat over the last few years.
Heard the bottom feeders part from an Associate there, frustrating to hang around the rim always looking for value, but have also heard that returns are quite good
I’ve heard of instances of sell-side banks calling to ask if their IOI $figure is typo, haha.
But yes, I’ll imagine their returns are solid — can’t really begrudge them for being disciplined (and I’m sure their LPs appreciate it).
It's a reputable PE firm? OP makes it sound like it'll hurt a resume
It’s a well-established fund with ~$40bn under management. Not Blackstone, but wouldn’t be out of place on 99% of resumes (HYPSW + GS TMT + HIG might raise an eyebrow, but people would probably just assume you had some sort of connection of Miami).
No denying HIG is a successful firm, but they have such a widespread reputation for low balling bids, retrading post-LOI, grinding their junior folks that I'm worried there's a stigma of sorts if you ever try to lateral somewhere else. I'm sure it's not a big deal at the associate level, but post-MBA I feel like people begin to associate you with your firm's brand and it may make movement more difficult than it otherwise would be.
I have no first hand experience in this at all, but it seems like I've heard jokes about HIG at all levels of my career.
HIG closes ~ 15 platform investments per year and ~ 20 add-ons. Returns are in top decile across PE. No distressed or turnarounds. Bottom feeders? Stigma?
found the HIG employee
edit: I said this jokingly but considering every single one of his comments for the last 4 years is about HIG I think it's safe to assume. So Shaino - the floor is yours, as a director at HIG, any truth to OP's worries?
I wasn't trying to hide brother.
This is the type of energy I come onto wso for
@Shaino can you comment on how much carry you get as an associate and VP?
Florida man has spoken!
Have been in high finance for 15 years and know plenty of people older/peers/younger than I that have gone through HIG. Can attest Shaino anyone who can make it through HIG is a G. They have IMO a great carry program, even at the entry associate level, which some of my peers are still clipping coups off of 10+ years out. Frankly I wish my PE program offered the same. Returns are top decile. You know who else are bottom-feeders? Apollo, Platinum, CD&R. If you don't know the the basic LBO math between entry and exit mult than you don't belong in PE to begin with. The better question to ask is how are they able to get these awesome entry mults in a mature and saturated industry that is PE....
Lmao at bottom feeder label dude. I work at one of the funds mentioned here at that connotation is almost exclusively used by senior bankers (in my exp) who will often falter on targeted or even broadly-marketed sell-side processes and get pissed when their shitty client doesn't demand an 8x+ ebitda multiple for a company / industry going to shit. When I was a first year it always puzzled me that bankers were confused as to why a shitty company or asset wasn't fetching a higher value with sponsors , especially value-oriented guys like Apo or Plat. But alas the sellside fees and incentives will always drive senior bankers to the point of irrationality until they discuss a deal that isn't theirs... then they have plenty of opinions as to why their MD colleague isn't able to fetch or eek out real value from his deal
.
Can confirm co-invest program offers huge upside at A / AVP level
What is the carry they pay at the associate and VP level? Thanks!
Who is their HH?
No HH, they use GoBuyside (not really a "HH") + an internal recruiting team
These guys should do themselves a favor and get off Gobuyside and instead go fully internal or use a respectable head hunter.
I have no doubt it’s a great firm, but there is something off-putting about getting 15 emails from Gobuyside in a year for HIG roles.
Edit: went back and did a filter in my email. Have 30 emails from them over the last 3-4 years for HIG opportunities (across different funds / strategies / locations). So not 15 a year but still a very large number.
For what it’s worth, one of their core funds recently used Henkel Search Partners for a mid level hire.
I just joined HIG as an Associate and think their recruiting process is quite on point. Found the process quite meritocratic given the steps are fair for all - Round 1 Interview, Round 2 Modeling Test, etc. Unlike some other firms which will only interview candidates from three groups at three firms or have some candidates skip ahead of the process based on superficial data. I'm biased joining out of a non-NYC office and lesser known boutique bank. Yes, on HIG having used GoBuyside for a while and handling internally - I was fine with that given the point above on consistency (I did well on the GAT Test which I think got me a look). I know GoBuyside has a search practice that HIG will use for more senior level hires as well as needed given its much more expensive. On the broader points about culture, bottom-feeding and all that - your investing your time to learn a skill-set. HIG puts up the returns so I dont understand why anyone wouldnt want to see hows it is done earlier in their career. From there, you can always pivot to targeting a better lifestyle or whatever. I do think there is value in seeing how you can "grind or sweatshop" out an extra 2 to 3 points on your IRR. Something you may not get at a firm that is less transactional and more focused on leveraging Partner's networks to generate great deal flow - not sure how much value you accrue as an Associate here as you dont personally benefit anything skill wise.
Dude your life is short and your 20s are shorter. It’s sad hearing you try to justify knowingly being miserable for 2-3 years. Lot of things in life more important than a couple extra points of IRR.
Life is short seems like a pretty weak argument for not spending a couple years with your head down working hard. Assuming you're in the US average life expectancy is ~78 years, so we'll pretend the tutorial years don't count and you're left with 60. So it's not worth it to work extra hard for ~5% of that time (~8.5% if we're saying 2 banking + 3 PE) to ideally position yourself for the remainder? Some people are more career oriented and realize that if they're willing to invest more of their time earlier in their career, it will compound more meaningfully down the line. Investing a few brutal years of work in your 20s can be the scale tipper that makes you worth a million or two by the time you're in your early-mid 30s (saving & spending habits obv taken into account). You work in consulting so it's probably safe to say you value work/life balance more than say someone who targeted banking. There's nothing wrong with that, in fact I'm sure there are plenty of nights the banker wonders if it would've been smarter to go your route. But clearly you have separate goals for yourself vs someone who chose the IB -> PE path (same here, hence Corp Dev).
What are you hours like?
I know a few people that worked there and most of the rumors are true; put in fake bids to get into processes then always looking to cut price no matter what, sweatshop at the associate and vp levels (associates are paid well below market), do a ton of work on every deal only to find out their committee hates it after months of work, etc. That being said, they all say they developed a great skillset and learned a ton that they can take elsewhere.
Does anyone know what HIG capital/white horse email convention is?
Had a few friends that worked there. They universally said they were underpaid and overworked. Poor culture with tons of hierarchy, and weekends are just more days in the week. Just anecdotes but take it for what it's worth when making a decision to move to the buyside
Any recent color on the culture at Middle Market specifically (which has a $3bn fund size, i.e. larger than the flagship LBO fund)? The Middle Market team appear to have a ton of VPs and Associates and not that many MDs and Principals. Good portion of the group is in NYC, with smaller offices in SF and Miami apparently.
Is HIG the kind of place where it's not great being an Associate or VP, but if you wait it out and get the Principal promotion it becomes more of a cushy gig because at that point you have two people working underneath you who can handle a lot of the grunt / less interesting work and as a result the hours improve materially?
Solid UMM PE shop with 1) top tier returns, 2) pay of a MM PE shop, 3) hours worked of MF PE. Overall great reputation among PE firms
... that seems like a bad combination
Well most UMM PE shops, especially the well-known ones, work hours of MF PE
Stingy , sweaty , and just overall low tenure of investment professionals . Look on linkedin and see for yourself. They don't treat juniors well based on two associates who have since left the firm. Can kind of tell given they don't have juniors on a team page like most funds of this tier do. Hard Pass
Bump - any insights into their European / London office? Deal Flow / Culture / Hours / Comp (esp Carry)? Think they made a recent effort to beef up that team, what's the view on that?
Anyone have insight into their Bayside Capital distressed team out of Boston and Miami?
Pay is shit at Bayside. Like 28 year olds having been there for 4 years getting $350k shit.
Anyone else have thoughts?
5 hunnid
Does HIG still underpay with all of the firms we've seen increasing salaries? Or did HIG also not increase?
My roommate is a 2nd year in NY..they raised comp for associates this summer. Still not KKR/Apollo comp though.
Appreciate it. Do you know how much the total comp is now? No worries if not.
Comp is low, culture isn't great, lots of throwing as many bodies as possible at low probability deals, and carry vesting terms at VP level are offensive. Firm has been successful and it should be good on a resume to pivot to other firms if it's the only offer you have
Et nostrum minima praesentium nihil. Quos aut sapiente omnis. Itaque vitae itaque impedit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Repudiandae aperiam atque et praesentium temporibus consequatur officia. Nostrum voluptate aperiam tempora recusandae quibusdam atque et. Impedit fuga quasi quam.
Quia totam officiis fugit beatae. Tenetur ad vel optio facilis veritatis beatae.
Consequatur est impedit ullam totam. Sit et corrupti blanditiis omnis odit doloremque.
Hic voluptate enim deserunt cupiditate illo. Dolor commodi laboriosam ipsum qui non voluptatem. Non facere porro aut fugiat tenetur qui. Sit nihil dolor vero animi itaque deleniti.
Voluptatem dolorem maxime culpa aut iste in. Eaque dolores qui ipsum. Cum est ea nihil eius unde ut ut. In ea quos aliquam consequatur ex in aut.
Dolorum ut autem cumque ea voluptas. Consequatur debitis amet nobis libero placeat velit. Et libero officiis odio consequatur. Ratione quae iure molestias quis sequi dolores. Perferendis provident consequatur sed non dolor.