MBB Interview - Case In Point VS Case Interview
So I have an MBB first round interview coming up in the next two weeks. I scoured the forums and came to find that the two most often cited resources to use were Case In Point and caseinterview.com
I personally started with the latter and found it quite useful. I know that many people have sworn by Case In Point and would say it may be the only material you need but while working through both I was stuck in what approach to take to cracking the cases. Specifically CIP has some 12 suggested frameworks while Victor Cheung only has 4, and in fact uses mainly 2 80% of the time.
Since I had started with caseinterview.com before I started reading CIP I have VC's thinking engrained in my methodology but I was wondering if this is really enough. Has anyone studied almost exclusively from his material and aced the case? I will still refer to the market sizing chapter in CIP as it is very good and in fact recommended by VC but I feel if I try to combine their approaches to the case I will end up worse off.
Interview is in 10 days. Any tips would be greatly recommended. Further, if anyone is willing to skype for mock interviews I will be willing to pay them a reasonable amount of cash. Case Interview charges $225 for a 1 hour session which is too steep for me so please make a reasonable suggestion.
Thanks for the input