MD IBD comp

I have always found that BB/EB MD comp is a bit of a black box. While it is relatively easy to calc PE comp given fund size, carry size etc. I was curious if people had either actual/anecdotal data for BB or EB IBD MDs

For example, do all MDs clear 1mm per year? Is there a "ceiling" to comp as a BB MD. Would really appreciate any insights (even if anecdotal) into this? 

28 Comments
 

When I was at JPM London, there was one IBD MD who was rarely seen, everyone in the team just knew his name.

He just had two really strong relationships with two of his childhood friends who are now both CEOs of two multi-billion market cap companies. Each does 1 deal per year (so 2 deals per year combined) and the execution team handles the entire transaction whilst the relationship MD goes and plays golf or drinks with the CEOs (all expensed on JPM ofc).

Apparently, he's only ever seen when he comes into the office to discuss the deals at the start with the team and then leaves during the live process and then comes back once closed to celebrate with the team (and then for the rest of the year no one hears from him or sees him, he's out enjoying life), both these deals bring in $5-10m in annual revenue for JPM and the MD gets $1m+ per year whilst not doing a single bit of work. JPM also do not pressure him and are comfortable with him doing what he does because both the clients said they will go where ever he goes so if JPM decides to fire him they'll lose a consistent $5-10m annual revenue stream. Of course, if either of these clients decides no longer to actively do transactions or if the CEOs both retire/get fired then the MD will probably be fired or retire himself, but for now, it's a pretty consistent revenue stream for JPM so they don't care.

I no longer work at JPM (I left in 2018) so if anyone reading this works in JPM London, comment below if you know who I'm talking about.

 
Most Helpful

There are unsurprisingly a lot of variables which impact MD compensation, including firm performance, group deal flow/performance, individual P&L/performance, seniority/role, etc

I would say for a decent MD at a decent firm/group, $1.5-2.0mm is a fair assumption for average all-in compensation. There are some earning sub-$1mm (either a bad year or headed for the chopping block) and some earning much more ($3-5mm+) if they book some big fees or whether they lead a strong industry or product group. 

I work at an EB and one of the primary reasons senior bankers from BB platforms join EBs is because it provides a more direct linkage between P&L and comp. Higher upside, but also higher downside. If you don't bring in any revenue, you could easily receive no bonus. Conversely, if you have a killer year, you can pull 8-figures. For example, there are some MDs I know of who have earned $20m+ in some years (and they aren't even super "high profile" guys like Ken Moelis, Jeff Raich, Blair Effron, Paul Taubman etc.)

 

Very interesting stuff- thank you so much for sharing. If you do not mind I had 2-3 quick questions: 

1) For BBs, since they offer a variety of product options e.g. debt, equity is it safe to assume it would be a "safer" place to earn good comp i.e. in a year like this, boutique M&A groups have taken a hit while BBs have increased revenue given rescue financing etc.? 

2) As a VP in an EB, do you think they are better places than BBs to get client interactions? Basically very curious as to what makes a "rainmaker" and whether they boutiques providing more client interaction opportunities give someone a better shot at becoming the proverbial "rainmaker" 

Thanks a lot for your time and data. Extremley helpful information. 

 

On point #1, i addressed a similar question in this thread: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/bb-vs-eb-total-compensation. Long story short, BBs do help offset variability in compensation for the average coverage banker because there are other products you can lean on -  ECM, DCM, levfin, derivatives, etc. However, it also means more mouths to feed across the bank for every $ of revenue and you're typically held more closely to an annual budget (target revenue) than at an EB

On point #2, it's a tough one, but I would say on balance it's better to be on a BB platform because it provides a more structured pathway to developing the industry expertise and the information flow that is crucial to carve out your own niche and originate business and not be seen as a pure execution banker for an existing rainmaker. If you're at a BB as a director or junior MD, you'll typically cover more companies in a given industry and have more touch points with a client than just M&A (i.e. not every player is super acquisitive, but every company will typically require financing at some point). There are very few high-profile "rainmakers" at the EBs who were home grown or spent 100% of their careers at independent advisory firms; most spent 10-20 years at the BBs and then made the switch later

 

Laboriosam qui aliquam repellat veritatis. Ut hic dolores facilis occaecati voluptatem error. Aspernatur ut reprehenderit quo magni quo sit autem. Sunt autem corrupti sint ad sapiente.

Labore et provident consequatur aut sunt voluptatem iste. Tenetur accusamus et qui est rerum. Iure porro fugiat praesentium aut perspiciatis eius dolor.

Et optio quos inventore. Sequi assumenda est quam laudantium. Culpa omnis ad eveniet eum fugiat. Numquam cumque quia beatae occaecati similique.

Totam minima ipsa voluptatem voluptatibus tenetur et. Unde nihil nam praesentium ut velit. Ullam ex magni sed nulla enim consequatur vitae repellendus. Fugit eos ea excepturi. Minima odit sed deleniti ex praesentium sint labore. Autem architecto error nesciunt aut nulla et eaque dolor.

 

Quaerat et unde id officia aliquid reprehenderit. Modi minima voluptatibus dignissimos non. Eligendi molestias corrupti sed alias molestias. Voluptas saepe omnis fuga tempora quisquam.

Deserunt temporibus vel beatae maiores provident distinctio. Illo quidem dolorem alias cupiditate necessitatibus. Est voluptates et earum repudiandae est aut aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”