Managing Director (MD) vs. Executive Director (ED)

This may be a dumb question but please excuse my ignorance. What is the difference between an Executive Director and Managing Director?

Difference between Executive Director and Managing Director

In the United States an Executive Director is most commonly equivalent to a Senior Vice President. Therefore it is the step before reaching Managing Director.

In Europe an Executive Director is the equivalent of a Senior Managing Director.

This point is well explained by user @fedor, a private equity associate:

fedor - Private Equity Associate ED is the same thing as a Senior MD, which puts him right below Group Heads. I'd say he can get you an interview or even a super day if he wants to but I don't think he could get you an offer. Maybe at a smaller firm, it would be possible, but not a large bank.

However, each bank has its own structure so you need to research each individual rank to determine where their position falls on the hierarchy.

Read More About Managing Directors On WSO

Want to Learn More About the Structure of an Employer?

Visit the Wall Street Oasis Company Database to gain access to exclusive data on compensation, interviews and employee reviews.

WSO Company Database

41 Comments
 

there is none. Goldman has executive managing directors and partner managing directors. Most firms just have Managing Directors though

 

There is a difference between Executive Director and Executive Managing Director. Executive Director is the same thing as a Senior Vice President and it is the position before reaching Managing Director.

GS has Executive Managing Directors and they are Managing Directors but they are not Partner Managing Directors.

EMDs at Goldman take home between $1.5 and $3 million a year. Goldman PMDs take in over $7 million per year

 
JambaMan

There is a difference between Executive Director and Executive Managing Director. Executive Director is the same thing as a Senior Vice President and it is the position before reaching Managing Director.

GS has Executive Managing Directors and they are Managing Directors but they are not Partner Managing Directors.

EMDs at Goldman take home between $1.5 and $3 million a year. Goldman PMDs take in over $7 million per year

what about these numbers now post lehman?

I don't throw darts at a board. I bet on sure things. Read Sun-tzu, The Art of War. Every battle is won before it is ever fought- GG
 
Best Response

fedor is an idiot. ED is above a VP, but below an MD. to refresh:

analyst -> associate -> VP -> ED/SVP -> MD

as with most answers, it all depends. however, whereas an analyst's / associate's BAD opinion can keep you out (i.e. - "thought the guy was a douche. we shouldn't bring him in."), their opinions don't have as much pull when trying to bring guys in. although the negative review of an ED/MD can definitely keep one out, their positive review on a potential candidate has a lot more pull. so to answer your question, as long you haven't pissed anyone else below / above the ED, and he likes you and is WILLING TO GO TO BAT for you, you should have a good shot.

good luck.

 

No need to call me an idiot before you do some research buddy:

http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/md-vs-executive-director

If you are on the US system, an ED is (as you correctly noted) right below an MD and is technically an equivalent of SVP. "ED" however, is not a very common term for an SVP in the US, therefore I assumed he was talking about the "English" system, where the ranks are Analyst -> Associate -> Senior Associate -> VP -> Associate Director -> Division Director -> Executive Director, i.e. DD = MD and ED = Senior MD. Lots of non-US banks are on this system so I don't think it's too unreasonable to assume that's what the OP was talking about.

 
fedor

If you are on the US system, an ED is (as you correctly noted) right below an MD and is technically an equivalent of SVP. "ED" however, is not a very common term for an SVP in the US, therefore I assumed he was talking about the "English" system, where the ranks are Analyst -> Associate -> Senior Associate -> VP -> Associate Director -> Division Director -> Executive Director, i.e. DD = MD and ED = Senior MD. Lots of non-US banks are on this system so I don't think it's too unreasonable to assume that's what the OP was talking about.

That's odd. I know JPM, MS and C have ED as a part of their ranks.

------------ I'm making it up as I go along.
 

Edit: Agree with above poster. "Analyst" could mean research, too. The issue here though is that there's less of a research focus in credit than equity and more of a component to pricing odd features of bonds or correlation products. A lot of it is a numbers game revolving around risk and yield, and credit research typically splits a lot of the attention from the traders with the chief economist's office making predictions about treasury action.

The desk analyst and credit titles says pretty clearly that he sits with the corporate bond or CDS traders. And Executive Director says he's probably not a 22-year-old kid. Analyst could mean research or it could mean quant analytics. If it were equity, I'd lean towards research; being credit, I'm kinda leaning a little more towards it meaning he's a quant. Really, it could be either one.

 

this is a new one to me. Sad state of affairs and a good indicator of "title inflation" when they put the word Executive in your name and you're stuck right in middle management.

 
SolidarityUh, you're not even considered "management" until you make MD / group head
You know what I meant. But yes, that further demonstrates my point
 

Depends where you are. If youre talking at a BB in IBD, easily 200 and 80-100%

"You stop being an asshole when it sucks to be you." -IlliniProgrammer "Your grammar made me wish I'd been aborted." -happypantsmcgee
 

Usually ED's are a step below an MD and can be depending on the firm either above or equal to an SVP. ED's can have a fair amount of pull, however I've noticed that there are two distinct groups: he first are those who are still on the !D track and are rising stats, the others make enough money and bring in enough business that they are worth keeping, but not enough to make it to MD.

 

EDs are junior to MDs. It is not unusual for an ED to be "Head of [insert non-core industry here] Investment Banking", but that's typically merely an indication that there isn't much coverage of that particular industry at the bank and thus there is no MD who covers it. Such roles do not mean they are "group / division heads", just that they are the most senior banker for a particular industry. For example, the Industrials group at JPM covers a wide variety of sub-sectors; if they didn't perform many deals in Capital Goods (making this up), it wouldn't be strange to see an ED with the title "Head of Capital Goods Investment Banking". That ED, however, would not be "group head of Industrials".

"For all the tribulations in our lives, for all the troubles that remain in the world, the decline of violence is an accomplishment we can savor, and an impetus to cherish the forces of civilization and enlightenment that made it possible."
 

Analyst (1-3) Associate (1-3) Vice President (1-3) Assistant Director / Senior Vice President / Executive Director Managing Director

Different EDs will have different clout, but they are all nearly MDs...

 

It is all simply a matter of the firm / group / individual, not their position. Don't mistake a title for power, as that's not always the case.

 

An ED is a good person to reach out to for a connection and entry point into the firm. They're senior enough to have some power, but not too senior that they'd ignore you completely. I've had a lot of success speaking with ED's and getting them to put in a good word for me through HR. Also, given their relative seniority, they can probably provide a broad perspective of the firm you're looking into, which is an advantage over talking to, say, and analyst.

 

Sed ad iusto voluptate cumque. Asperiores autem aut provident velit quod ipsam quod. Et nam iusto perspiciatis hic nulla sint. Cum iste unde cupiditate voluptatem nisi sed corrupti. Consequatur dolor quisquam commodi dignissimos minus qui est. Ut non quod saepe neque aliquid. Incidunt quo qui eos minima ut aliquid. Labore dolor odit atque quod veniam unde similique.

Consequatur aperiam consequatur et. Architecto suscipit qui nemo recusandae odit harum. Facilis blanditiis rem labore quod sapiente necessitatibus. Qui architecto impedit velit nam vitae voluptas sed.

Magni aut eveniet sint. Omnis labore deserunt distinctio doloribus cupiditate. Officia vero quis culpa nulla ut voluptas voluptatem. Similique amet inventore nisi. Debitis quo illo laborum reiciendis est velit. Repudiandae aut eum assumenda impedit.

 

Et sunt rerum assumenda eligendi. Aut modi velit magnam porro fugit numquam nihil. Voluptatem adipisci qui voluptates voluptas consequatur quae.

Nemo impedit qui ducimus tempore. Non consequuntur et consequatur cumque non iste reiciendis suscipit. Quis aperiam dicta voluptas rerum natus reprehenderit. Sint corrupti quos voluptatem unde. Quae est debitis voluptatem ducimus nesciunt.

Repellendus aspernatur eaque neque sint sequi est. Et occaecati porro aut omnis est. Soluta illum earum asperiores sed sunt libero.

 

Sit est adipisci officiis dolore quibusdam consequatur mollitia. Accusantium et et ut sed cum ut. Fugit aut temporibus alias totam.

Sint dolorum ad molestiae illum inventore vel accusamus. Magnam quasi illo ut quod rem. Eum distinctio et commodi asperiores. Nemo sit voluptas quia nihil consequatur molestiae molestiae. Facilis qui praesentium voluptatem. Quibusdam temporibus qui quae earum itaque.

Velit in vero quo rerum architecto. Necessitatibus aperiam minus et dolorem qui fugit necessitatibus. Tempora expedita est quia alias facere et fugiat. Non est est quisquam tempore maxime adipisci. Et quia et tempore sit recusandae placeat.

Cupiditate ut ipsum expedita. Vel ex soluta maiores dolorem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”