Outlook & Exit Opps of Fixed Income vs. Equity Research

Based on what I’ve read in various threads, it seems that in the near future, (sell-side) equity research as a whole is consolidating and will not grow too much. I wanted to know whether the outlook for fixed-income research is better or worse than equity research?

Also, how do the exit opportunities coming from FI research compare to exit opps from equity research? I know that both can go into the the buyside but does one type of research have more opps than the other? Thanks.

29 Comments
 
Dece

From what I've read, it seems like:
Equity: Equity L/S
Distressed: Distressed Debt, Distressed trading
Macro products (rates): Macro fund

Wo Wo Wo there. So what you're saying, and correct me if i'm wrong, is that if i research distressed debt, a distressed debt fund may be interested in me? Like, they want people with transferable skills. Mind. Blown.
"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 
Oreos Dece:

From what I've read, it seems like:
Equity: Equity L/S
Distressed: Distressed Debt, Distressed trading
Macro products (rates): Macro fund

Wo Wo Wo there. So what you're saying, and correct me if i'm wrong, is that if i research distressed debt, a distressed debt fund may be interested in me? Like, they want people with transferable skills. Mind. Blown.

Distressed damsels also qualify

People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for freedom of thought which they seldom use.
 

Jesus, I think you should compare apples-to-apples. If you were doing Investment Grade fundamental research vs Large Cap fundamental equity research, the Large Cap guy would have more opportunities because there are more funds that do that kind of investing, and the equity guy will probably understand fundamentals better. Also not as much money to be made in high grade bonds especially given the lower vol.

 
Going Concern

Jesus, I think you should compare apples-to-apples. If you were doing Investment Grade fundamental research vs Large Cap fundamental equity research, the Large Cap guy would have more opportunities because there are more funds that do that kind of investing, and the equity guy will probably understand fundamentals better. Also not as much money to be made in high grade bonds especially given the lower vol.

On IG, people trade the synthetic using basis trades.
"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 
Oreos Going Concern:

Jesus, I think you should compare apples-to-apples. If you were doing Investment Grade fundamental research vs Large Cap fundamental equity research, the Large Cap guy would have more opportunities because there are more funds that do that kind of investing, and the equity guy will probably understand fundamentals better. Also not as much money to be made in high grade bonds especially given the lower vol.

On IG, people trade the synthetic using basis trades.

Um, yeah, some do...point?

 

if you take corporates out of the question for a second, you can speak about wanting to drill down into a company story as oppose to a government, country, rates...Even in the case of corporates, you'll be dealing a lot more with cash flow than with the entire story of the company. A bonds value is "more or less" determined based on if company x will have abc amount of dollars to meet xyz amount of interest payment. IMO, equities require a deeper understanding of the other factors at play and your investment thesis can have a longer time frame as oppose to corporates where the deadline is set from the beginning. Obviously, this is a little simplistic and there are other considerations but I would think something along these lines would suffice for an interview.

 

I think I see what you mean. There are definitely inherent differences between analyzing the two. In the simplest sense, ER guys care about buying at discounted value whereas fixed income guys focus more on leverage. Additionally, someone who is looking at fixed income investments isn't going to care about the high growth capability of a company if they can't service the debt today (unless maybe we are talking about zero coupon bonds). On the other hand, and ER analyst would consider factors other than current cash flows in gauging the investments desirability; maybe the growth potential that would be the basis for the CF projections are the 'entire story of a company' that you are referring to (correct me if I'm wrong).

Does anyone who has worked in Fixed Income or Equity Research know the most common pros/cons that are commonly cited? Are there any obvious points that I should know to address?

Tradinif you take corporates out of the question for a second, you can speak about wanting to drill down into a company story as oppose to a government, country, rates...Even in the case of corporates, you'll be dealing a lot more with cash flow than with the entire story of the company. A bonds value is "more or less" determined based on if company x will have abc amount of dollars to meet xyz amount of interest payment. IMO, equities require a deeper understanding of the other factors at play and your investment thesis can have a longer time frame as oppose to corporates where the deadline is set from the beginning. Obviously, this is a little simplistic and there are other considerations but I would think something along these lines would suffice for an interview.
 

This is a joke right?

They are exactly what they sound like.

Fixed Income Research is research either on FI issuers or on specific issues. Equity Research is on companies that issue equity (publicly listed stocks) and on trends in equities for industries and whatnot.

--There are stupid questions, so think first.
 
hungryFI is prolly the most boring piece of a garbage in any full service shop. Avoid like the plague. ER tends to place better into HF and buy-side generally speaking.

Unless you join the FI distressed trading desk. Its the best place to be right now. In a few years you'll have the experience trading junk which will set you up as a perfect HF transfer.

 
hungryFI is prolly the most boring piece of a garbage in any full service shop. Avoid like the plague. ER tends to place better into HF and buy-side generally speaking.

Disagree 100%. I work at a hedge fund with someone who came from fixed income research and i would prefer to work in FI then equities. I am continually perplexed by the seeming consensous on this board that equity hedge funds make up more of the buyside world then fixed income funds. That is just not even close to being true. In general, the market for individual equities is a sideshow compared to FX and rates markets in terms of size, depth, liquidity and the amount of people employed.

 

Bondarb is very biased, but has some good points. There is no consensus about the size of equity hedge funds compared to bonds, options, currencies, or commodities. This is just you reading into the fact that they are discussed more often on an IB focused board. Also, someone who comes from IB, consulting, PE, or equities S&T is much more likely to wind up at a L/S, fundamental, equities type shop.

FI is a very large space, with excellent placement options if you want to leave. ER goes well to Corps, Equity HFs, and PE shops. FI goes into well HFs, credit analysis, DCM type positions at banks, etc. These days with debt markets as they are, there are tons of distressed debt HFs out there looking for people, however a few years ago that market was much smaller, and will hopefully be again.

--There are stupid questions, so think first.
 

do you mean fixed income research? the hours can be rough around earnings time make no mistake. the higher less ppl, but fewer are interested

 

Yeah, fixed income research.

I don't mind working really rough hours at crunch time, or for that matter working long hours during the week, or even working the occasional weekend.

However some of my friends who did i-banking over the summer pretty much worked every day for 90 hours a week. No way I would want to do that consistently through the whole year.

 

Thanks.

Can you give me any more concrete info on salary? i.e. average pay for analysts, associates who have an MBA, VP, MD, etc?

 

Nobis unde excepturi laborum voluptatibus. Quia omnis ut corporis facilis molestiae fugiat. Porro itaque qui quia et laborum repellendus dolor. Aut voluptates in placeat molestias mollitia ut facilis.

Labore quaerat et doloribus perspiciatis et sint. Qui at delectus est odit quam dolores.

Provident velit adipisci iusto doloremque et est. Aliquid voluptatem minima sit ad voluptas ab est. Quaerat odio ipsum consequuntur itaque nulla ut. Dignissimos quo cumque enim quis ea at at. Sapiente maiores voluptas perferendis qui quae.

Autem at harum et. Quia qui et nobis laborum et facere et. Alias est minima voluptas impedit eius impedit dicta.

 

Earum inventore non tempore numquam voluptas nam quia vitae. Et molestiae amet rerum natus neque aut.

Sint autem vel in nobis velit ex accusantium et. Quae minus nam et deleniti nobis qui dolorem reiciendis. Temporibus quo vero occaecati reiciendis.

Eveniet aliquid inventore architecto voluptas mollitia consequuntur voluptas rem. Expedita modi adipisci consequatur magni possimus magnam ad. Optio sed velit vero nesciunt.

Doloribus dolor voluptatem iste saepe facere est doloribus. Deleniti distinctio sit quisquam veniam qui perferendis rerum. Sed cupiditate alias consequatur facilis. Neque exercitationem porro quasi harum nihil et excepturi. Officiis facere aut maiores exercitationem culpa suscipit. Et possimus ipsa id quaerat.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”