I got the interview invite as well... I'm brushing up on my understanding of the PE industry and how PJT's group fits into

I think it would be helpful to understand why investors would want to sell their existing stake in a fund (i.e liquidity concerns, or becoming overweight in a certain sector/ geography) or buy a secondary stake ( and how these investors value these investments)... Technicals wise, I really don't have any idea what to expect, but I'm studying LBOs and how different assumptions can be manipulated to reach a range of valuations.

Best of luck with the interview, and PM me if you want to exchange information.

 

Bump, I almost accepted an offer from a BB doing secondary advisory but wasn't sure of the exit opps.

It seems as though that, even at large PE secondary shops (Lexington, Coller, etc) most associates have regular IB coverage/product experience, rather than a secondaries background.

Do people have info on exit opps?

 

I'd say that getting into a secondary buy-side gig after an advisory role isn't that difficult, as long as you can articulate that you know how to value a fund/company. You will have a definitive leg-up since you'd actually know what secondaries are and would know what you're getting into, but you'd be at a disadvantage to your peers on valuation/modeling, so make sure to talk that up and you'll be fine. Try to get staffed on a restructuring or other type of deal that goes into detail on company-specifics, will help during an interview.

 

Would you happen to know if the UBS and CS analyst also work on fund restructurings that would allow them to do more direct company analysis? My impression is that they're mostly engaged in LP stake sales, which is then more powerpoint and fund level vs company level.

 

Sorry for the late reply. Yes - I believe that they're more engaged in generic LP stake sales. I haven't seen any restructurings from them, but that doesn't mean they don't do them.

As far as straightforward secondary work goes, UBS tends to have better deal flow than Credit Suisse, but I've heard chatter of some instability at UBS, so CS might be safer from a job stability perspective.

If you're primarily interested in fund restructurings, the top places I see those deals from are Park Hill Group, Greenhill/Cogent, and Evercore.

 
Best Response

Fair bit of misinformation going around in this thread. There is a massive difference between a secondary brokers and a secondary investor. PJT, like UBS, Greenhill Cogent, Setter etc. are secondary brokers. A secondary broker has one job- connecting LPs who want to sell a stake in a private equity fund with another LP who would potentially buy that stake. As an analyst, your responsibility is building a network in the LP / GP industry and managing the transaction process. There is very little valuation / due diligence work since it's solely the purchaser's responsibility to perform this. It is also highly unlikely that a sophisticated buyer would rely much on any analysis performed by a secondary broker due to conflicts of interest (i.e. you are working for the seller and thus have an incentive to mark up the portfolio companies).

This is a completely different ballgame from secondary investors like Coller, Lexington, Adams Street etc. These are the guys who are the buyers of the fund stakes mentioned above. They perform in depth valuation and due diligence on the portfolio companies in the fund.

Due to the different nature of work, exit opps from secondary brokers are drastically different from exit opps from secondary investors.

 
neil91:
Fair bit of misinformation going around in this thread. There is a massive difference between a secondary brokers and a secondary investor. PJT, like UBS, Greenhill Cogent, Setter etc. are secondary brokers. A secondary broker has one job- connecting LPs who want to sell a stake in a private equity fund with another LP who would potentially buy that stake. As an analyst, your responsibility is building a network in the LP / GP industry and managing the transaction process. There is very little valuation / due diligence work since it's solely the purchaser's responsibility to perform this. It is also highly unlikely that a sophisticated buyer would rely much on any analysis performed by a secondary broker due to conflicts of interest (i.e. you are working for the seller and thus have an incentive to mark up the portfolio companies).

This is a completely different ballgame from secondary investors like Coller, Lexington, Adams Street etc. These are the guys who are the buyers of the fund stakes mentioned above. They perform in depth valuation and due diligence on the portfolio companies in the fund.

Due to the different nature of work, exit opps from secondary brokers are drastically different from exit opps from secondary investors.

Care to share the exit opps you have seen for those coming from secondary investor backgrounds? And how does it compare to those from a secondary broker? Thanks.

 

You can divide the PE investing landscape into four: primary funds, secondaries, co-investments and directs. Its usually easy to move from right to left of that chain. Very tough to move from left to right. Not saying its impossible or that it has never happened but its rare.

People in the secondary investing business tend to stay put in that part of the market. It's very hard to move to directs unless you go a top MBA route. Although there are certain firms that do primary, secondary and co-invests and will let you be a generalist and get exposure to all three of those investment types.

Exit opps from secondary brokers tend to be within other placement agents, either doing secondary advisory or primary fund placement. Think firms like Atlantic Pacific Capital, Park Hill, MVision, Evercore Private Funds Group etc.

 

I have an interview with Park Hill Secondary Advisory in NYC and would love to get some insights into what to expect in the interview. Limited info online but seems like an interesting job

 

Est omnis rerum officia maxime praesentium. Ea molestiae enim enim enim. Perferendis id quaerat excepturi minima. Soluta et ipsa laboriosam ab veniam soluta.

 

Dolores illum tempore nulla nemo autem recusandae. Possimus quisquam eum eos ipsam rerum similique. Dolor iste voluptatem laborum iusto veritatis sunt reprehenderit aliquid. Numquam natus nulla illo. Possimus aliquam perferendis molestias animi repudiandae autem. Aliquid recusandae consequuntur earum et.

Tenetur beatae ut corporis qui culpa. Quidem cumque numquam facilis occaecati unde. Iste fugiat ut aut error. Ullam inventore quae ut et. Fuga distinctio qui aspernatur maxime.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (205) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”