Stanford GSB vs. Wharton/Columbia/Booth for Finance?
Hey all,
If I am focused on having a career in finance in NY, would it not make any sense to choose Stanford over Wharton/Columbia/Booth despite its prestige? Please discuss...
Hey all,
If I am focused on having a career in finance in NY, would it not make any sense to choose Stanford over Wharton/Columbia/Booth despite its prestige? Please discuss...
Career Resources
Is this an option you actually have or is this a hypothetical situation?
I think it's being posed as a hypothetical. I'm also interested in hearing opinions on this.
Stanford is very viable for NYC recruitment. Firms are very willing to fly out to interview there or if they have an office in SF you can request a different location.
If you ever have this problem make sure to come back and answer the 100 questions from everyone on how you did it.
Wharton, Booth, Columbia...in that order. Stanford is not a finance school, at least I won't choose it over wharton or booth. It's good for tech though
Seriously?
i assume this is a bad attempt at trolling but nobody turns down GSB unless its for HBS. End of story.
its the truth bruh....not trolling. I am not even applying to hbs. lacks the academic rigor
You know this from having previously attended HBS, as well as the aforementioned schools you are comparing its academic rigor to?
I think this is the order:
Wharton Stanford Columbia Booth Stanford
Thoughts?
I think you mean:
Wharton Wharton Wharton Wharton, and Wharton
Because Wharton spits hot fire.
Yes I just wanted to discuss Stanford's worth in the finance world.
So... looks like we don't have any consensus here?
They're all prestigious schools but I would chose Stanford any day. You seriously can't beat the weather in California, and aside from weather Stanford offers a great education.
Give me a break. Stanford and HBS are obviously top 2 for anything including Finance
Did you get in or is this mental masturbation?
Wharton or Booth and nothing else.
Chicago is over rated. Will adjust back to reality in time. Everyone here seems to forget they became a big name school post donation(and name change). How long will that cash last.
Although I won't knock some of their finance faculty. Great line up, but many of them are retired / retiring. Will be interesting to see if they can recruit or grow current faculty to same caliber as previous.
Actually, word is that the NAV of the donation has gone up; that their investment returns have exceeded how much of it they've spent.
Actually, neither Booth nor MIT are "Ivy League". You should know what this term means; it's an athletic conference with a fixed membership composed of the undergraduate arms of eight universities, six of which have business schools: Harvard, Yale, University of Pennsylvania, Columbia, Dartmouth, and Cornell. Princeton and Brown are part of the Ivy League and do not have business schools.
To the OP: I'm of the opinion that Stanford's selectivity is above all the other schools, and in the East Coast, they know that too.
FWIW, I think the latest USN ranking is the most accurate one I've seen, with the exception that I would bump Tuck up to 7th (and I generally lose interest after the 9th school - in the past I've said T9 is the the true 'club' in business schools, even if 9 is not an attractive heuristic).
The gift Chicago received wasn't a one-time lump-sum. It was equity in DFA (which has grown tremendously over time) with attached cash flow. It's actually crazy how good/smart this gift is if you think about it. The NAV grows, as does the cash flow, without much, from what I understand, action on Chicago's part. They'll be well-funded for a very long time.
Thanks a lot for your inputs. It seems my employment prospects are similarly solid at any of these schools.
My main concern is, as someone who is set on a finance career and would prefer NYC/London/HK over SF, I wonder if I would fit in much better at a place like Wharton just based on having more aligned career interests and goals with my peers, and also build a better network from a finance career point of view? Does my thought process make sense here?
Bump!
Around 2008 Stanford GSB decided that it didn't think Wall Street finance was where it was at, and decided to focus on "entrepreneurial finance" and that's what the school is incredibly good at. Of course it has your corporate finance and some great investment management courses, and some well regarded professors (one of them, Jonathan Berk, is just terrific), but it really has been focusing on venture finance and startup stuff, and what the student body and silicon valley cares about. But indeed the NY firms do recruit there and take people year after year. No recruiter is actually going to turn their back on a solid Stanford GSB candidate. That's just the way it is. I say this from having been a resume coach at the GSB career management center and as an editor for finance profs. papers. I think Stanford can definitely hold its own in terms of the 2 year experience and the career prospects.
Now, it's a very self selecting school, and if anyone is half-hearted about going there, don't waste your $250 to apply. They can tell if someone takes the school seriously -- they don't need to try to scoop up people who haven't drunk the GSB Kool-Aid
OK, now would you fit in better if your peers had similar interests? Hmm, maybe, but I see that the networking across functions and industries would probably be more helpful in the long run. But feel free to push back on that idea -- It's kind of a personal decision of what you want "fit in" to mean.
Honestly if you get into any of these schools your set. I wouldn't fret about the choice too much. Although I'd kill someone to got to Wharton or HBS.
Honestly if you get into any of these schools your set. I wouldn't fret about the choice too much. Although I'd kill someone to go to Wharton or HBS.
If you want to working in BB Investment Banking in NYC, schools up to Kenan-Flager & Goizueta should be enough.
Do a LinkedIn search and you'll see what I mean.
Something to consider in this debate is the relative unpopularity of IB at both H/S. While the schools may not do as much to "prepare" you for an IB summer, they are both without question the "best" business schools by brand in the world. That leads to banks wanting to snag a few from each every year, and if you are one of the few at either you are also one of the few even pursuing IB. Your competition to land an interview is lower, as is your obligation to hustle to even get an interview. This year at HBS there were folks who interviewed first round with MS/GS/JPM that hadn't attended a single recruiting event. I don't know if any of these folks landed internships, but the fact that they could even interview says something. Those of us that did the full process ended up with multiple offers from MS/GS/JPM, etc. The challenge at these schools however is convincing your interviewer that you will actually do banking, which is not as easy as you would think.
Uh no... you should not pick any of those schools over GSB for finance lol.
GSB usually places around 1/3 of its class into finance every year (vast majority going into PE), which is more than HBS. Those students are placing all around the world.
There are these weird perceptions by some ppl on here that if you want to do entrepreneurship, tech, or something on the west coast - HBS won’t work. Or if you want to do finance on the east coast - GSB won’t work
So far from the truth. If you go to HBS or GSB, you will have access to any opportunities you want. They are on another level than any other b schools
I’d love to hear you trying to explain to KKR that you got into GSB but chose Columbia while they mark your email as spam and proceed to chase after the GSB and HBS kids who routinely place into top finance roles every year
My older brother went to GSB and placed into a great PE role in New York. He said he had a really easy time placing in ny because those firms still recruit heavily at GSB, but many ppl in his class wanted to stay west coast
Necessitatibus vel dolorem architecto explicabo. Ut libero non quia voluptatem sit repellat. Quo necessitatibus ipsam odio at pariatur sit. Necessitatibus omnis quos est.
Non alias enim perspiciatis dolore. Autem voluptas aut et et architecto amet. Quibusdam quidem quisquam velit esse.
Maxime inventore exercitationem numquam dicta. Facilis animi quaerat temporibus ea velit non. Maiores voluptate consequatur cumque voluptatem.
Cumque quia rerum iste dolor eum qui placeat ipsa. Tempora quis animi fugit placeat quis explicabo saepe quas. Atque iure est quaerat sed.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Aut sed provident totam qui rerum necessitatibus eum. Aut molestiae quis ex molestiae. Maiores enim cum non commodi et est harum.