Superscore SATs?

Hello
Most universities look at SAT superscores in the admissions process. For those that do not know what a superscore is, here is an example:

First time taking SATs: 2100 - Critical Reading 700, Math 800, Writing 600
Second time taking SATS: 2050 - Critical Reading 750, Math 650, Writing 650
Superscore SAT: 2200 - Critical Reading 750, Math 800, Writing 650

Basically, the highest score on a section from any test is used. Note that it is usually frowned upon to take it more than 1-3 times.

So, is it fine to put down my superscore SAT on my resume without noting that it is? I'm asking because I feel that there is a big difference between my separate composite scores and my superscore. Think 2250: 680, 770, 800 and 2150: 770, 720, 660 to give me a superscore of 2340: 770, 770, 800.

What do you guys think? Sorry if this has already been answered or if the difference in SAT scores do not matter. By the way, I will be attending college next year, which is why I believe that my SAT score makes more of a difference at a younger age. Thanks!

 
darknight12:
Idk about on a college application, but if this is your resume? Absolutely! They're wondering how you did on each individual section put together, I see no reason at all why you wouldn't. You're not lying at all.

He would DEFINITELY be lying. Did you read the part where he said "can I put my super score on my resume without noting that it is." His SAT score is 2250, not 2340. If he wants to put 2340, he has to say that its a superscore or else it is lying.

What if I took the SAT three times, and each time I spent all the time on 1 section? 800/200/200 three times. My highest score would by 1200/2400, but my superscore is 2400/2400. Would it be ok for me to put my SAT score as 2400 on my resume? How the fuck is that not lying? He HAS to say it's a superscore

To OP: Just put 2250, or put 2340 and say it's a superscore. Either way is fine, and you don't want to risk losing an offer because of lying about SAT scores.

 
jgx101:
darknight12:
Idk about on a college application, but if this is your resume? Absolutely! They're wondering how you did on each individual section put together, I see no reason at all why you wouldn't. You're not lying at all.

He would DEFINITELY be lying. Did you read the part where he said "can I put my super score on my resume without noting that it is." His SAT score is 2250, not 2340. If he wants to put 2340, he has to say that its a superscore or else it is lying.

What if I took the SAT three times, and each time I spent all the time on 1 section? 800/200/200 three times. My highest score would by 1200/2400, but my superscore is 2400/2400. Would it be ok for me to put my SAT score as 2400 on my resume? How the fuck is that not lying? He HAS to say it's a superscore

To OP: Just put 2250, or put 2340 and say it's a superscore. Either way is fine, and you don't want to risk losing an offer because of lying about SAT scores.

Well yes, to be sure you'd want to put superscore, but sorry I just don't think it's really lying to just put down your highest scores: your example is an extreme one (although it is possible) and I highly doubt the employer would actually ask for the documents to begin with. But yeah, to be safe I'd put superscore. OR, I'd just put SAT: then Math - 800, Reading - 800, etc., individually - I don't think that'd be lying even if he just put SAT and and the section with nothing else but the score if he did it that way. Also no one really even today follows the "out of 2400" thing, people think still in terms of 1600 so one big score doesn't clarify the sections anyway. Maybe that's the way I was thinking he'd be more likely to put it in the first place - but yes I definitely see your point if he'd put one big score without explaining.

 
jgx101:
darknight12:
Idk about on a college application, but if this is your resume? Absolutely! They're wondering how you did on each individual section put together, I see no reason at all why you wouldn't. You're not lying at all.

He would DEFINITELY be lying. Did you read the part where he said "can I put my super score on my resume without noting that it is." His SAT score is 2250, not 2340. If he wants to put 2340, he has to say that its a superscore or else it is lying.

What if I took the SAT three times, and each time I spent all the time on 1 section? 800/200/200 three times. My highest score would by 1200/2400, but my superscore is 2400/2400. Would it be ok for me to put my SAT score as 2400 on my resume? How the fuck is that not lying? He HAS to say it's a superscore

To OP: Just put 2250, or put 2340 and say it's a superscore. Either way is fine, and you don't want to risk losing an offer because of lying about SAT scores.

I'm gonna assume you're not from the US...otherwise you wouldnt be saying such idiotic things...next time dont give advice on shit you dont know

 
jgx101:
darknight12:
Idk about on a college application, but if this is your resume? Absolutely! They're wondering how you did on each individual section put together, I see no reason at all why you wouldn't. You're not lying at all.

He would DEFINITELY be lying. Did you read the part where he said "can I put my super score on my resume without noting that it is." His SAT score is 2250, not 2340. If he wants to put 2340, he has to say that its a superscore or else it is lying.

What if I took the SAT three times, and each time I spent all the time on 1 section? 800/200/200 three times. My highest score would by 1200/2400, but my superscore is 2400/2400. Would it be ok for me to put my SAT score as 2400 on my resume? How the fuck is that not lying? He HAS to say it's a superscore

To OP: Just put 2250, or put 2340 and say it's a superscore. Either way is fine, and you don't want to risk losing an offer because of lying about SAT scores.

I'm gonna assume you're not from the US...otherwise you wouldnt be saying such idiotic things...next time dont give advice on shit you dont know

 

First of all...OP, idk how you got 800 in math when you clearly cant add...and you usually (by usually, i mean always) put your composite score, not an individual test score...you should just put 2200...but keep in mind no one gives a shit about writing so you'll usually just put the reading and math sections.

 

First of all, sorry to cause this shitstorm lol. Basically, I was just wondering if I should put like "Composite SAT: 2250 with maybe Superscore SAT: 2350" underneath.
I only asked this because in the college application process, nobody differentiates between your highest composite score and your superscore because colleges ONLY look at your superscore. I do not intend to lie about my composite or my superscore. I'm only asking if it is normal to put down your superscore at all because in the college application process, superscore is the only thing looked at. I don't know if this has been a trend, i.e. from composite to superscore, but as of the past few years, this has been the case in the application process. Now back to the resume, from the comments, I seem to get that Composite SAT: 2250 with maybe Superscore SAT: 2350" underneath would be okay. Is this true? Sorry again for any misunderstandings, thanks!

 
First of all, sorry to cause this shitstorm lol.
I think people are responding to what they perceive is your attitude, or at least your perception. So you're not really sorry until your perception changes.

There are people who are more liberal with the truth and there are people who are much more conservative with it. The problem is that the people who are conservative with the truth- or at least BELIEVE they're conservative with the truth, think that people who play a little more fast and loose hurt them in the recruiting process. It's like someone cheating off of your test to get an A in physics class and throw off the curve for everyone else.

It's ok. You're a college student, and you can be forgiven for being confused by all of the rules about truth vs. marketing on resumes. I still get confused by them and I'm probably six years older than you. And a lot of folks' anger comes from their own insecurities. Welcome to the forums; I think folks are going to like you once you learn the ropes.

 

No. A combined number is disingenuous. Just put down "SAT scores (best from multiple exams): ___Q/___V/___W". The recruiter will add it up in his head and handicap it by 20% of the difference from 2400 against a single test score, but you do owe some disclosure. If you made it to state on the Math team and also was on the varsity swim team, it's fine to list those separately. But don't combine them to say that you were a state swimmer.

Resumes are a place where you can stretch the truth but not break it.

@insidenothing: colleges have a vested interest in using your superscore because that is what they report to US News and World Reports for their rankings. Nobody has heard of SAT superscores; that might change; but in the meantime, just report your best section scores from multiple exams, denote it as such, and do not add them up. Let the recruiter do that for himself.

 
IlliniProgrammer:
No. A combined number is disingenuous. Just put down "SAT scores (best from multiple exams): ___Q/___V/___W". The recruiter will add it up in his head and handicap it by 20% of the difference from 2400 against a single test score, but you do owe some disclosure. If you made it to state on the Math team and also was on the varsity swim team, it's fine to list those separately. But don't combine them to say that you were a state swimmer.

Resumes are a place where you can stretch the truth but not break it.

@insidenothing: colleges have a vested interest in using your superscore because that is what they report to US News and World Reports for their rankings. Nobody has heard of SAT superscores; that might change; but in the meantime, just report your best section scores from multiple exams, denote it as such, and do not add them up. Let the recruiter do that for himself.

^ This. I would say the easiest thing would be to put ___M/___V/___W. The reason everyone used to want composite was because they could easily say "wow, 1500, out of 1600, that's on average a 750" and so on. It was almost automatic for someone to divide it by two or to think "wow only 100 points off on two tests." When someone says "I got a 2200" people go "okay wtf... well it's out of 2400 so I guess that's 2200/3, which is.. uhhh 733 I guess so I guess that means 733 on each." It's just confusing now that people list it out of 2400. People aren't used to it. Which is why you should just list the individual scores.

 

Because we were there too a few years ago and somebody helped US. Hopefully he'll pay it forward too when he's working in industry.

I got a genuine one-sitting perfect score on the SATs (like many other quants). Along with Eagle Scout it's one of the two things I still list from high school. It irritates me a little that someone thinks they can take their best scores from three exams and put down 2400, but we've said and thought foolish things as college students too, so OP can be forgiven. Let's not bully the poor kid.

 
Best Response
IlliniProgrammer:
Because we were there too a few years ago and somebody helped US. Hopefully he'll pay it forward too when he's working in industry.

I got a genuine one-sitting perfect score on the SATs (like many other quants). Along with Eagle Scout it's one of the two things I still list from high school. It irritates me a little that someone thinks they can take their best scores from three exams and put down 2400, but we've said and thought foolish things as college students too, so OP can be forgiven. Let's not bully the poor kid.

Very true, always insightful IP. I was more referring to my inability to avoid threads when I already know what they're going to be about from the heading. That SAT score is an incredible accomplishment and I could see how that would be annoying. I get the same feeling when someone says they work in 'banking' when their a teller or says they fly when they haven't even soloed a plane.

 
IlliniProgrammer:
Because we were there too a few years ago and somebody helped US. Hopefully he'll pay it forward too when he's working in industry.

I got a genuine one-sitting perfect score on the SATs (like many other quants). Along with Eagle Scout it's one of the two things I still list from high school. It irritates me a little that someone thinks they can take their best scores from three exams and put down 2400, but we've said and thought foolish things as college students too, so OP can be forgiven. Let's not bully the poor kid.

Agreed. I said the same exact thing, minus the Eagle Scout part (but I also left Eagle Scout on my resume), and I got a lot of shit for it. There was nothing wrong with my reasoning and I was helping the OP without being a bully at all. Some people on this forum can't read properly...

@ eleutheros: You didn't even read the topic did you? If you did, go back to 5th grade and work on your reading comprehension. He wasn't asking if he could put a superscore, he was asking if he could put a superscore without noting that it is. @ Bernankey: Maybe you should check your math. OP added it up correctly. While you're at it go take a fucking English course too.

 

Hey guys a guy I know is thinking of selling off a company that he owns; he had 0 sales and was 0 in debt debt a couple of years ago after he incorporated, and he now has 5 million in debt now and 1 million in sales. Can I use a "super accounting method" when presenting to investors that an auditor would sign off on where I could put the debt from the year 0, while also listing this years sales, to have the highest possible valuation? Thanks!

“...all truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” - Schopenhauer
 

Alright, so I should just put "SAT (best from multiple sittings)" I wasn't trying to only put my superscore sat or pass my superscore sat as my one setting sat. It's just that I have never had a resume before, and in my experience with SAT scores so far (college application process), only the superscore SAT was used. I was not trying to get an unfair advantage. I was just looking for the convention. I now understand what is right to do and I thank you guys for reading/commenting. Thank you IlliniPorgrammer for being so genuine and understanding. I'm young and new to these forums and promise I'll try to think things over more before asking here again. Thank you.

 
I wasn't trying to only put my superscore sat or pass my superscore sat as my one setting sat. It's just that I have never had a resume before, and in my experience with SAT scores so far (college application process), only the superscore SAT was used. I was not trying to get an unfair advantage. I was just looking for the convention. I now understand what is right to do and I thank you guys for reading/commenting. Thank you IlliniPorgrammer for being so genuine and understanding. I'm young and new to these forums and promise I'll try to think things over more before asking here again. Thank you.
It's ok. As you get older, you realize that not everyone reads and interprets things the same way that you do on resumes. Just remember to be nice when you are a full-timer at JP Morgan and some confused freshman is asking if he can round his 3.951 GPA to a 4.0. Hope you stick around and eventually make sure kids don't get bullied by insecure college juniors who are having trouble landing internships.
Alright, so I should just put "SAT (best from multiple sittings)"
Yes. I think that's the most honest way to put it. And DO NOT add up the three numbers, because you're adding apples and oranges. So you might have something like this:

Best SAT scores (multiple sittings): 780Q/720V/750W (optional) Best individual SAT score: 2200 (750/700/750)

DO NOT give a combined number from two or more separate exams. Just disclose, let the interviewer make his own assumptions, and give you credit for that.

@eriginal Ha! I guess I'm guilty of that. Congrats on your full license.

 

^the fact that you would make a big deal out of this shows just how fifth-graderish you are. SAT scores on resumes aren't even required for most firms. And do you think the person reading the resume has the time to care whether the 3 scores were obtained in one sitting?

Pathetic.

 
eleutheros:
^the fact that you would make a big deal out of this shows just how fifth-graderish you are. SAT scores on resumes aren't even required for most firms. And do you think the person reading the resume has the time to care whether the 3 scores were obtained in one sitting?

Pathetic.

You're saying that just because SAT is insignificant it is ok to lie about it. Before I was trying to explain to you why you can't just put 800/800/800 when you really got a 600/750/650, but I guess you are too much of a fucking idiot to believe it. I'm done here and I'm sure that lying on your resume will eventually come bite you in the ass, good luck with that.

 

Ipsum qui delectus repudiandae vitae. Nisi eveniet officiis minima sit est. Impedit dignissimos iure molestias in animi soluta sunt. Velit odio vitae et rerum.

Ut minima ullam consectetur odio velit. Officiis at quisquam ut accusantium. Animi ut aut ut amet voluptatum rem. Nesciunt velit voluptate libero voluptas ut eos magni. Quidem fugiat incidunt vitae nulla laboriosam explicabo.

Occaecati quia id expedita possimus est. Qui velit molestias et nostrum. Itaque ducimus voluptates eos accusantium illo reprehenderit. Et earum velit accusantium libero doloremque. Aperiam atque quaerat occaecati nam dolor omnis impedit distinctio.

Iure sapiente commodi ut dolore. Hic ad nisi officiis consequatur sit sit. Nulla ut expedita ex adipisci quae consequatur. Et recusandae doloremque qui recusandae repellendus ut nihil consequatur.

 

Voluptatum hic quibusdam nihil qui voluptatum. Eius qui sed est animi corporis distinctio voluptas. Omnis tenetur sit dolorem a. Error ut facilis rerum et at blanditiis vel. Ducimus impedit ducimus quo.

Iste ex ut maiores est enim. Aut maiores dolorem eligendi unde voluptate maiores fugiat. Deleniti et debitis quos nam. Mollitia et mollitia nesciunt magni aut nisi illum. Earum repellendus consectetur consequatur eos omnis error provident. Omnis ratione amet cum. Qui sed et mollitia libero repudiandae ipsum.

Quas qui omnis dicta possimus est. Animi tempore reiciendis aut et ea. Quisquam quo ab cum et voluptas repellat est eligendi.

Dolor in earum consequatur natus nesciunt ex maxime. Labore est laborum voluptates commodi est. Et sequi quasi laborum id non. Dolore iusto ea eligendi sed et dolorum provident.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”