Working with equity placement agents/capital raisers

Previously we were raising money through our private client list, but lately we been approached by several placement agents that like our portfolio and acquisition criteria. I know typically fees vary anywhere from 5%-7%. How are the fees structured? Some of them are asking for an upfront retention fee and they are relatively hefty. Is this normal? We don't want to throw money at them and they end up not being successful. Or is the norm that they just collect when they are successful? Anyone here have experience as a placement agent or worked with one? Thanks.

18 Comments
 

If the OP is referring to asset specific, I have worked with an equity placement agent and in my experience, fees are typically around 200 bps of total equity raised. Depending on the pedigree of your shop, this fee can be greater or less.

The 1 deal I worked on like this we ended up securing our own capital, and because of this we did not owe anything to the shop (there was no upfront retainer). However, because real estate is such a relationship driven business, we ended up giving them a flat fee to cover their marketing expenses.

 

200 bps is pretty good. This is an asset specific deal. I guess in your case it makes sense since you raised the capital by yourself. I just wanted to get a sense of the norm here, if we have to pay an upfront retainer. I can certainly understand a reimbursement for their marketing efforts.

Array
 

Its likely that you may be only doing debt deals. I know there are several groups within RE brokerages that call themselves capital markets. Some of these groups only work on sourcing debt transactions. It depends on if your group handles equity placements.

Array
 
Best Response

For reference, retainer fees are both common but also beneficial for both parties. Most legit placement agents will only take on between 5-7 fund clients per year, and raising a fund is a long and stressful and testing process. It wouldn't be too bad for a placement agent to instead of taking on 6 clients, they take on 10 clients with the intention of cutting off 4 of the funds who's fundraise is looking shaky or struggling. If you are one of those funds that just got cut off, you just lost 5 months of time.

A retainer fee gives the agent a fiduciary duty and contractual obligation to the PE client, that way both sides know that they will end up getting paid and getting a service.

We're not lawyers. We're investment bankers. We didn't go to Harvard. We Went to Wharton!
 

Additional more simple question: If you want to raise 1MM, does the equity placement firm (who is charging say 2% of the total equity raised) aim to raise $1,020,408? After the equity raiser takes their 2%, the principal is left with their requested $1,000,000. Is this taken into account? 980k might not get it done for the principal given a $1mm raise and 2% fee. I'm obviously talking small money in this example but the point remains.

 

to your first question, yes, it is capitalized. whcih relates to your second question: because it is capitalized, it is part of the overall capital stack, and the equity is a certain percentage of that capital stack. so the equity is raised to fund a certain portion of a capital stack, regardless of whose fees show up where in the total cost.

 

Sed in amet porro porro cum saepe. Ex ut nostrum magni facere. Est non cupiditate assumenda consequatur ipsa similique. Et praesentium qui vel. Quidem modi excepturi quo et quo.

Eveniet repellat dolore omnis occaecati ipsa sit qui. Nam sit sed magni tenetur harum sit maxime. Accusamus et natus ullam est minus illum.

Praesentium repudiandae perspiciatis nesciunt autem sequi veniam. Dicta autem explicabo architecto inventore sed atque mollitia. Aperiam natus voluptatum molestiae alias aspernatur. Velit omnis libero neque qui consequatur. Aliquam sequi natus sed harum quaerat.

Aut temporibus quis nostrum totam. Commodi neque quaerat voluptates. Voluptas doloremque non et eum laboriosam dolorem quisquam. Optio aut reprehenderit fugit perferendis impedit mollitia. Tenetur unde harum voluptas suscipit ratione dolores facilis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.6%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (77) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (71) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”