Trending Content - Hedge Fund Forum
| +49 | Do Quantamental roles really exist? | 24 | 6d |
| +18 | Yes, this question again… | 5 | 1d |
| +17 | L/S Equity Career London | 11 | 3d |
| +13 | Hedge Fund Pivot | 3 | 12h |
| +12 | Hedge Fund (Fundamental Long Short Equity) Compensation in Singapore Hong Kong | 3 | 4d |
| +11 | Buy Side Credit - Seats / Guide | 1 | 1d |
| +11 | Mid-career shift to buy side with niche background | 3 | 20h |
| +9 | Nvm | 6 | 3d |
| +9 | Wfh / work remotely at MMs or SMs? | 5 | 15h |
| 0 | Hedge funds | 1 | 18h |
Career Resources
Setting aside whether they're UNDER-valued, the real question is why do companies/industries trade at multiple X of metric Y (dividend yield is a multiple at the end of the day). The two main things, in my eyes, are growth expectations and degree of certainty (setting aside things like WACC/risk free rates). You say that the sector is trading below historical forward P/E multiples, but that alone doesn't tell you much. What if historically, forward EPS showed 5% growth and now analysts think they'll be declining? Dividend yields are an even clearer example-my trailing dividend yield doesn't mean much to me if the company generates less FCF and has to cut its dividend.
In the case of telecom specifically, the short answer is that people expect long-term, secular pressure on legacy voice-based carriers (RLECs/CLECs/ILECs/etc) and require a higher dividend yield (or lower EBITDA/EPS multiple) to compensate for the fact that in 5 years your dividend (or EBITDA or EPS) will probably be lower. This isn't "new", but people have become more focused on it due to a few things that may increase competition/accelerate legacy voice declines-for example consolidation in cable and changes in how people consume video.
This is also a good example of looking through an index to the members within it. For example within the S&P 500 telecom index you have 5 companies: VZ, T, CTL, FTR, and LVLT.
You can divide these into 3 groups: VZ and T are incumbents copper-based wireline operators with leading wireless franchises that offset the declining revenue from their fixed (landline) business. Both are expected to grow topline next year, and both trade at high-single digits of trailing EBITDA.
FTR and CTL are smaller copper-based LECs. FTR's tricky because of all their M&A but both are expected to see organic revenue declines and both trade ~5-7x PF trailing EBITDA.
LVLT is a fiber-based backhaul provider that grows like crazy and trades at 15x trailing EBITDA.
you a TMT or telecom guy aren't you.
Recusandae quis et quo dolores tempore qui rem iste. Dolore necessitatibus hic id explicabo. Aut quo qui commodi est earum facilis iusto. Ea eaque quas quia id labore beatae. Fugiat nihil commodi tenetur eos perferendis doloremque recusandae. Eum enim eum placeat nisi sint soluta consequatur.
Doloremque quibusdam temporibus quisquam voluptatem. Et non corporis deserunt suscipit qui voluptates dignissimos totam. Iure consequuntur mollitia sed vitae. Reiciendis dolorum maiores sapiente culpa.
Tenetur impedit reiciendis quidem et laboriosam. Consequatur iusto quod velit quo iusto odio laboriosam. Magni magnam expedita omnis ipsa fuga est et. Nam est ducimus assumenda nemo. Vero beatae totam magni nobis iste.
Dolor ex voluptatem voluptatibus quasi. Inventore et consectetur aut iusto. Reprehenderit et occaecati optio tempore voluptates molestiae quia. Quaerat et officia eos voluptas eveniet voluptatem nulla itaque. Voluptatem id dolorum et nihil velit libero. Omnis neque rerum beatae doloribus tenetur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...