CFA Level II exam: study notes enough - Schweser the best option?
I simply used Schweser's notes to pass CFA Level I with minimal study time. Has anyone had a different experience w/ the Level II exam? Will study notes be enough and is Schweser the best Level II option?
I have the Schweser notes for Level 2 right now, they are a huge help compared to the lengthy CFA Institute notes.
I say stick with what worked.
Is taking a prep course a waste of money if preparing for CFA 1? Is preparing with the schweser notes sufficient?
You won't need a prep course. You've already got the CFA books and the Schweser notes, so I would advise against it. Stick w/ the notes and do the practice exams and Qbank included by Schweser.
I took Level II last year. Schweser skimped on the portfolio management section so make sure you read the curriculum especially in this area...for the other areas, I thought the exam was fine, but do practice a lot and review the CFAI documents for ethics and PM. It's obvious that CFAI is trying to make the exam more "proprietary" as evidenced by the requirement to now bundle the curriculum with the exam.
Thanks numi, much appreciated. How'd you find Level II compared to Level I in terms of difficulty and study time needed?
Don't underestimate the amount of time needed to pass Level II - it is quite a bit more challenging than Level I. A lot of the stuff in Level I, I either learned in college or during my experience in BB equity research. Best advice I can give you is to take a lot of practice tests, do not procrastinate, and understand how all the key concepts relate to one another (rather than getting too caught up in the little minutia). I put in about 125 hours of study time for Level I and probably around 200 hours for Level II. You seem to be pretty on top of stuff so maybe it would take you about this much time too, but just don't let anyone tell you that you can "get by" doing a certain amount of hours...you have to figure out what's right for yourself.
Also, I second an aforementioned poster's suggestion to read AnalystForum.com. Actually, this is where I've posted most frequently, since given my experience in equity research, I've generally had more to contribute there (and in a similar fashion as WS Oasis where most people don't work in IB/PE, most people on AnalystForum also don't work in ER/HF and are trying to learn). However, you'll see me more on these boards now that I'm working in PE.
By the way, thanks again for your advice on the PE stuff that I asked you about a while back. I ended up taking a job at a large middle-market buyout shop and just started recently. I'm sure I'll be seeking your advice again once I get settled in, as far as what I need to do as a new PE analyst in order to (1) move up the learning curve quickly and (2) be seen as a leader and contributor rather than someone who just does what they're told, and I think a lot of this has to do with understanding what is important to deal teams, which is something I don't really understand yet. I'll make a separate post about this in the PE forum when I have a chance to collect my thoughts a little.
Analystforum.com is a better site to post/search CFA exam questions. A few thoughts:
The questions are coming out of the readings so make sure you do the end of section of questions and review the examples in the actual books.
Schweser is fine but expect to put in more time to prepare. It's also good to put in the time early in the event sh!t hits the fan at work and you're crunched for time later.
There is always a chance the exam will test you on something Schweser glosses over. Happened last year.
Edit: Don't want to encourage bad study habits.
you CAN NOT pass level one on 1-2 weeks prep. That is the dumbest shit ever. There's a 39% pass rate playa, and underpreperation is the one of the reasons for people not passing this shit.
Edit: Don't want to encourage bad study habits.
Wingman - I agree w/ Ratul. 1-2 weeks prep for Level I is absurd, no matter how familiar you are with the material. The knowledge base is so broad that there's almost no way you've seen most of it in classes and can familiarize yourself with it in such a short period of time. Hopefully you mean 1-2 months prep. You've got to have enough time to absorb the material.
That being said, Ratul - the 39% pass rate is a little misleading, as nearly have of the people 61% who "fail" are no shows for the test because they're underprepared and don't show up for the test.
That being said, Ratul - the 39% pass rate is a little misleading, as nearly have of the people 61% who "fail" are no shows for the test because they're underprepared and don't show up for the test. .................................... nystateofmind, where did u get this info? thanks!
nystateofmind, i think you might be wrong? chech this out. page 13 far right column...it says they only include those who showed up in the stat
http://www.cfainstitute.org/cfaprog/overview/pdf/IntoOur5thDecade.pdf
but maybe they do include those individuals who give up after ten minutes...who technically "sat" for the exam?
Fair enough - you and Ratul are right. Was a stat I saw somewhere back in November, although I clearly misread.
If i'm not mistaken, that statistic does not include those who fail to come in and take the exam. That would mean that the pass rate is actually significantly lower than that which has been reported.
Or am i mistaken?
Much appreciated - great advice. Best of luck in the new job - you'll have to let us know how it's coming along.
Guys, please help! I am studying CFA and wonder if there is any kind of score report for each level you pass? I think this might help in many cases. Thanks alot!
Yes there's a score report indicating areas in which you scored over 70%, b/w 50-70% or below 50%. The specific grades DO NOT MATTER, you only need to pass the exam.
Generally true, although you cannot pass the exam without passing the ethics portion. Know a girl who thought she could blow off the ethics section. She ended up passing every section except for ethics, causing her to fail the entire exam.
The need to pass ethics to pass the exam is a common misconception. A former exam grader told me that failing ethics will not cause you to fail the exam. However, anyone who is slightly below the pass/fail threshold that does really well on ethics generally passes. I know several people who have failed ethics on every exam and now have their charters.
This is simply not true - I passed the level 1 exam and did not pass the ethics section
I hope no one considering the CFA program takes the war stories of Wingman and his coworker that seriously. I passed Level I in December given 4 months of study (Schweser) and an undergrad Finance degree and by no means was it easy. I worked with people who passed Level II and III last summer, both of whom recommended doing the full CFA curriculum rather than Schweser for anything above Level I.
Schweser was great, but Level I, as comprehensive as it is, can be passed with a very good superficial review of the material such as Schweser, but I'm not banking on that to pass Level II and will take my sweet ass time.
Lame as it sounds, the CFA isn't designed as a program for people cramming to pass a test (here's looking at you CPAs), but rather for people who want to expand on their Finance background to gain professional credibility and refine their knowledge base.
Can any one send me 2008 CFA Level 1 ebook link or advice me from where to buy? Earlier i bought from www.elitebook.net but never got the schweser books link. The seller has simply disappeared after withdrawing my money from western union.
I am in NY. If any one want to form study group, they are welcome. I am appearing in december exam
PM'd you
Anyone who wants to form a study group for CFA Level 2 and lives in the Philadelphia area let me know. I am trying to form/join one. I also want to ask anyone who has passed level 2 if Stalla is a good way to go for review. Thanks!
I did CFA between 2006 - 2008 on Schweser notes + mp3s. The mp3s were just someone reading the notes, but I listened to them traveling to work, jogging, walking the dog and pretending to listen to my wife tell me about her day at work. CFA I - III is 80% memorisation and constant mp3 indoctrination helps.
CFA Level 2 2010 Schwesser Books (Originally Posted: 11/02/2009)
Does anybody have PDF versions of the books?
Thanks.
do you need CFA 2012 study package 1,2,3 contact [email protected]
CFA Schweser 2010 Printed paperback books for Level 1/2/3 (Originally Posted: 12/24/2009)
CFA 2010 Printed paperback books - $140.
Printed Schweser CFA 2010 notes for levels 1, 2 and 3 in paperback available!
Print quality is excellent.
For each level set, books 1 - 5 and practice volume 1 included. (book 0 included for Level 2 and Level 3)
Books come bound with cover.
Cost is $140.
Please email me at [email protected] for more details and mention PAPERBACK in the subject line.
do you need CFA 2012 study package 1,2,3 contact [email protected]
CFA SCHWESER 2010 LEVEL 2 PACKAGE (Originally Posted: 01/27/2010)
CFA SCHWESER 2010 LEVEL 2 PACKAGE
Level 2
1) 2010 Schweser Study Notes ( 1 – 5 )
2) 2010 Schweser QuickSheet
3) 2010 Schweser Practice Exams Volume 1 and 2 with detailed solutions
4) 2010 Schweser Qbank
5) 2010 Schweser Video CD
5) 2010 Schweser Secret Sauce
Discount if you buy more than 1 product.
payment by paypal, all files are downloadable.
Email me for sample file.
Email me at [email protected] if you have any questions.
CFA Exam Books (Originally Posted: 09/26/2010)
Hey guys,
I am taking CFA L1 in June - out of your experience, has someone passed L1 with just CFAI books? I was thinking to get Schweser books, but feel like, having a Finance background I can give it a try without additional books. Also, did someone use 2009 books for 2010 exam for example? What is the difference? Appreciate responses. Thanks.
I passed Level I this June. I'd say if you are up to reading heavily without loss of attention, the bulky CFA books are enough.
I didn't buy any of the other super-expensive guides, but did plop for the Elan 11th Hour Guide as a handy summary to read in the last few weeks and browse during the break on D-day.
IMHO the reading is important, but it'll really boil down to you cranking out large numbers of mock exams in the final run-up to the exam. Best of luck!
PS - I don't think you have the option to use '09 books, they'll make you buy the '10 books during registration.
Hey,
Thanks for the info. I do have the whole 2011 set of CFA books, but since Schweser supposedly is really easy to read, I was thinking to buy 2009 or 2010 used set of Schweser books as a supplement material. I was just wondering if the content really changes much from year to year...
The material doesn't differ that much from year to year and you can look up the changes on the internet.
Use Schweser for L1 and the CFAI books for L2 & L3.
I did CFAi books the whole way through.
People always refer to the CFA books as the ultimate source, the thing is they are actually pretty bulky and make for a pretty tough reading. If you can make your own summaries and outlines with the CFAI books and at the same time be able to link all of the material together you should be set.
In the other hand the study guides help a lot, personally I used them and have been successful in level I & II in my first attempts. My strategy was to read the CFA texts to get a grasp of the material and then focus on the guides por practice and mastery of the material (its a lot of material).
Like PBFsaid the most important part of the exam is practice for level two I did approximately 2,000 practice questions so when I went in to the exam I knew I was ready.
You should check out "analystforum.com" the whole site is composed of charter holders or candidates and there you'll find a lot of useful info and study tips
Best of luck on your endeavor, I'm sure you'll nail it.
Just curious, for those who read the CFAI books, particularly the one on Financial Analysis and Reporting for the 2010 edition, did you guys find the chapter on Tax very poorly written? There are numerous sentences that look like they came straight out of a tax rulebook: eg. page 490, first sentence on Unused Tax Losses and Tax Credits: "IAS 12 allows the recognition of unused tax losses and tax credits only to the extent that it is probable that in the future there will be taxable income against which the unused tax losses and credits can be applied." Even the Q&A section at the end was poorly done, especially when compared to previous chapters. Whereas in previous chapters they would explain, in addition to why a particular answer is correct, the common mistakes made in the incorrect choices, the answers to quite a few questions are simple repetitions of the correct answer.
Download the Schwesers off bit torrent. Don't touch the CFA Institute textbooks - they're a waste of time. What the CFA books say in 10 pages are summed up nicely in about 2 pages. I do have an undergrad degree in finance but if you're a business background you'll be fine.
I just worked off the Schwesers and passed in June. My buddy did the exact same. My other friend used the 2008 Schwesers to write in Dec 2009 and passed.
BTW if you go on torrentz dot com you will find all the study materials for free.....
or ebay if u wanna shell out 10 bucks
CFA L2 vs L1 (Originally Posted: 01/16/2011)
Hi,
Can people share their experience from the CFA Level 2 exam?
I sit for the exam this June, after passing the Level 1 last June.
I'd like to know if L2 contains material from L1? - I mean little details that people are likely to forget or weed out people who crammed some material for L1? Or does L2 strictly test from the L2 curriculum?
Thanks.
L2 builds on a lot of the knowledge learned in L1 and digs deeper in some subjects. L2 is the most difficult level to pass. good luck.
Thanks, that makes sense but let me clarify my question through an example.
Will L2 simply ask for the name of a method to calculate market concentration or will they go deeper and ask you to calculate the Herfindahl Index? I guess what I want to know is, how much will they scrutinize the L1 material? Another example would bootstrapping - are they going to us ask how to calculate this again or just know the basics of term structure?
The reason I'm asking is that I don't (and didn't) use the majority of the info from L1 in equity research so I've forgotten some tidbits.
I took L2 last summer. You need to know the general concepts behind all of the material that were in L1. If a specific formula was covered in L1 but, not in L2, i.e. Herfindahl Index, then you do not need to know it. Like Dibbs said, all of the L2 material builds on the L1 material. If you crammed for L1 you will most likely have to relearn a lot of the material. Unfortunately I can't recall a single lay up question from L2 where it asked you to "name the method". L1 wasn't too difficult because the material really isn't that challenging if you come from a finance/acct/econ backgroun, there's just so much of it. In L2 they take the same volume of material and increase the difficulty three fold. FRA, Equity, & Derivatives are all a huge bitch.
There were quite a few questions on the L2 exam that asked for precise calculations using some random formulas that were mentioned in a single paragraph of the CFAI text i.e. Ibbotson-Chen Equation (Everyone missed this one)
PM me if you have questions about L2. I would check out analyst forum if you want in depth CFA discussion.
SamSung, you'd rather not compare L1 and L2 - these are materially different in terms of difficulty. Materially. L1 is like a first filter, nothing more than an easy screening test. L2 is a real stuff
Shiz! What can I say? You guys are right.
I went through the material before I started studying and it did look complicated (but things normally do when you just flip through the book without reading the material) so I didn't think too much of it...until... I actually started started studying. I've gone through the time series analysis and went up to Interest Rate derivatives in the Econ section, and this is definitely harder than L1. But the material is more interesting too.
Thanks all.
Everyone says that level II is the hardest, but imo, level iii is the hardest because sometimes you just don't know WTF the CFAI is looking for.
As for your question - each level is self contained. If it's not in the text for level 2, then it's not going to be on the test. The derivatives section of level II always trips people up so spend time there. Spend less time memorizing the formulas, but more time on conceptual questions like.. if x changes up, how does y change.
Good luck! I always feel bad for people going through the CFA.
Also, learn to manage your time better. There's less questions in level II, but they will take longer.
LIII is by far, without question, undeniably, much more difficult than LII.
I wouldn't agree with mossy695. My personal opinion was that in terms of difficulty, L2 and L3 where approximately the same.
CFA level 2 question, help... (Originally Posted: 05/27/2012)
(Not sure where to post this question....)
I hope you guys are having a better Memorial day weekend than I am. I am going to take the CFA test next weekend and have a few questions not sure whom to ask...
If there is somebody nice enough to answer a few accounting related questions, I will really appreciate it.
-1 (background info in the picture), question is whether Thomlinson's comment is correct. --this is a question in 2012 mock exam.
Thanks so much in advance.
there is no way to enlarge that fyi
Yea there is.
And it's incorrect.
Seems correct. I'm not sure though. Reasoning: Since the Net profit is very high, it could be a recognition of a one time gain(or liquidation). The -ve BS accrual ratio suggests a decrease in the operating assets big time(I'm assuming the buggers sold of inventories without replenishing, hence the accrual CF ratio is highly positive too).
PS - Hate the accounting portion of the CFA.
operating cash flow is cash accounting number, earnings and operating income are accrual accounting based.
I don't recognize those ratios but I assume with those numbers you can calculation CF, EBIT, and NI
This just made me realize how little i remember from Level 2 after only a year.
Sorry I can't help, but good luck on Saturday.
duffmt6-- I barely remember anything I read a week ago.
The answer is that his comment is not correct. The company experienced more cash earnings than accounting earnings. I am quite slow with accounting, and not sure what's going on here.
This question doesn't seem to make much sense.
To me, "the comparison you have made between operating cash flow and operating earnings is biased upward when comparing to accrual based operating income."
The comparison is the operating cash/operating earnings which is 0.4 This means that 40% of the operating earnings are actually converted to cash. I don't understand where the "biased upward" comes from though. The question refers to Chapter 26 which covers accruals. Accrual based earnings are not persistent and have to eventually revert. Could this mean biased upward?
I'm taking the practice test tomorrow morning. We'll see if I am right haha
I am so confused by this.
Oreos, can you help us understand better.....seems like you got the right answer....
Gray Fox- i think accounting questions in mock are much harder than those in the book.
This question was bullshit. I'm not sure if it was in the thumbnail, but the BS accrual ratio for 2010 was negative indicating that cash earnings were greater than accounting earnings.
Also, the questions before this was bullshit. The revenue recognition practices were fine, but if they changed the useful life for depreciation assumptions from 10 years to 8 years that means depreciation was understated in previous years. The classifying 4.5mm of voluntary early retirement expenses as non-recurring seems much less significant.
Frustration.
I dont think you should classify retirement expense as non-recurring because its normal operating expenses. But I agree, the accounting part is overly tricky, just ridiculous.
CFA Level 2 - How many months did it take to prepare? (Originally Posted: 06/10/2012)
For those of you who have taken and passed Level 2.
How many months did it take you to prepare?
What resources did you use to study?
How much harder is it than level 1?
Was there an increase in interviews once you listed that you passed level 2 on your cv?
Any insight is appreciated.
Thanks
How many months did it take you to prepare? ~4
What resources did you use to study? Primarily Schweser, with the occasional Wikipedia/Fabozzi/Damodaran
How much harder is it than level 1? ~2.5x - Same areas are covered but it is much, much more in depth.
Was there an increase in interviews once you listed that you passed level 2 on your cv? N/A, not interviewing at the moment but I've actually had headhunters tell me to leave it off of my resume for various reasons.
wow, could you indicate the reasons why to leave it off?
Because it has no relevance for a lot of jobs and could signal that you're not really focusing on your career goals. The CFA is obsolete in PE, VC, M&A, consultancy, and I guess wide parts of "AM".
Interesting. Everyone in Asset Management under 35 has one and many much older from what I have seen in ER and AM. Many in PE etc seem to really respect it, although not require it. I go by the job description and if it's not in there as preferred, then tend to leave it out unless a technical position.
What if you don't want any of those jobs? If you're taking the CFA you most likely are set on a career in AM.
I probably said that wrong, but at the time that I was job hunting I had just taken level 1 and 1) did not know if I had passed yet, but probably more likely 2) didn't want to seem like I was "looking past" the jobs I was applying for (middle office/trade support).
I frankly didn't really agree with him but he had a point that people often take the CFA to get their foot in the door at a company and very quickly try to move to another position. It depends on the job you are applying for, I guess.
Just took it so I don't know yet if I passed.
I studied for 284 hours.
The material is more broad and deep than level 1. Furthermore, there are only 20 item sets of 6 questions each, and each item set usually testes one particular section. For example, they might go deep in options derivatives, meaning that if you skim that section you will probably only know 2/6 answers.
As for interviews, I don;t know, but I assume so as I'm trying to move into either sell-side or buyside research and every posting you see says 'completion or enrollment in the CFA program'
Agree. I think it's perfect if you got your eyes set on AM. I think it's not really useful though if you're trying to switch into the fields I mentioned, and I think that people looking for such roles who get their CFA could use their time in better ways.
Number of hours for CFA 2 (Originally Posted: 07/12/2012)
Just wondering how long you guys studied for CFA L2. The general consensus is that it is significantly more difficult than L1. Some people have said around 2.5x harder and most people/sources say that you should study 20-50% more than you did for L1. The recommended study hours of 250-300 for L2 seems unrealistic given its difficulty.
Probably more than 300 hours, depends on how smart you are. Level 2 is a beast. At least 2X harder IMO.
I'll tell you in 2 weeks when results come out how much you should need. I'm guessing 10 more hours than I put in.
Just curious, how come you're taking the CFA if you want to get into banking?
Two things stood out for me for Level II:
It's not that the material is hard or difficult to understand. There's just too damn much of it. Trying to get all of it at once is like trying to pile too many books onto a table - once you try and pile on books on one end, a ton fall off the other side. That was the majority of the time spent for me on Level II - trying to memorize everything.
Accounting. God, the bloody accounting.
I would say start earlier, and you can always take it easier later on.
Can it really be that much more material than Level I? The total amount of pages for the 6 books comes out to around 3500 pages. I can't see the readings being that much more, I'd imagine it's just the difficulty of the questions.
Has anyone done a CFA / MBA partner program? Recommended?
CFA lvl 2 study (Originally Posted: 09/28/2012)
For all my future CFA'ers....when will you start studying for CFA level 2?
I'm studying for the GMAT rigth now and plan on taking it sometime in November....I was thinking that I would start studying for Level 2 in the middle of December.
Is that enough time?
January if all goes as planned (dec L1).
Passed L2 in June. I recommend you start as soon as you are done celebrating GMAT completion. I am still procrastinating ahead of L3 at my peril.
Yeah that's enough time, prob more than enough time. I would spend December reviewing level 1 material.
Don't bother reviewing Level 1. There is very little overlap and the basics will come back quicker than you would think. Hard to give any guidance on a timeline, as it completely depends on how much studying you will be doing. I personally preferred the ~3 months of very intense prep vs. 6 months of casual studying.
I'm taking the Level 2 in June. Is Schweser enough to get me by or do I need to go through those boring ass CFA Institute study guides?
Start studying in early January, read the actual books if you can. The test is pretty tough and the amount of material is staggering (wait til you get to the derivatives book). At the very least, do the end-of-chapter problems in the CFAI books (do each section MULTIPLE times) and take as many mock exams you can get your hands on in late April/early May. Good luck, and godspeed.
I started in March 1st and cleared it comfortably. Check out my blog post about it:
http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/blog/my-cfa-study-tracking-sheet
CFA level 2 - Much of a difference? (Originally Posted: 11/29/2012)
what is the best CFA level 2 class to take in nyc? I did nyssa for level 1 and passed. I liked the teacher but now he is at Kaplan.
is there much of a difference?
I used Stalla for my first try at Level 1 and had Peter Olinto was my instructor. He's pretty good, but I think he's at 7 City now. Check Analystforum.com. His new company advertises with a pic of him by the banner.
Which prep notes did you use for L1?
I used Schweser for Level 1 and took the 16 week NYSSA class taught by Andrew Spieler. He is teaching level 2 and 3 not at Kaplan and Nathan is teaching level 2 at nyssa
I had Nathan at NYSSA for L2 and would recommend. He was def knowledgeable, had good advice, and took my call for a question on the problem sets during the weekend (don't abuse that, though). I also studied my arse off and work in finance, but I passed by a solid margin on the first try.
did you have Spieler for level 1? if so who did you like better? (nathan vs spieler)
Come on, you can learn it by yourself. It is not that hard.
CFA LII (Originally Posted: 05/17/2013)
To everyone tackling this giant menacing bear of an exam with me in a few weeks, a sincere wish of the best of luck.
I'm roughly 120 hours behind my planned study hour target at this point, so it's back to banking style days until the finish. Please pardon my relative absence from the boards in the meantime.
Sidebar, funny how you can be two weeks out from a test and still feel like you are "cramming." Anyway, if I somehow manage to pass this little f**ker, I'll do a writeup on how it's done.
Go get it!
My thoughts exactly. Im just gonna grind out some mocks for the remaining 2 weeks - then hope for the best.
I'm currently pulling in solid 65-70%s on mocks and practice exams. Hoping to get that over the 70 mark during the next 2 weeks.
I am just signing up for Level 1 but good luck and keep WSO posted.
Studying for Level I myself, but agreed - odd that I have been cramming and still have over two weeks. Best of luck to the level one goers as well (level three too, all gotta get through this somehow)
Who are you again?
But in all honesty, I'm in the same boat as you, minus 60 or so hours. I figure I'll finish the last book (Schweser) and start mocking and doing questions. Going to be a long two weeks, but I have banking hours to finish as well so it's going to be tight (that's what he/she said).
Can't wait till I'm done with this shit...
I'm in the same boat, two more weeks until freedom!
I thought it was waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay easier than the mocks. Pleasantly surprised.
Definitely easier than the 2013 CFAI mock (only one I took).
Some tough sections but overall pretty fair. I think I have a 50-75% chance of passing.
You?
Odds are you went 2/6! Pretty unlucky if you really got none correct :)
I could never properly motivate myself for Econ/Quant/Portfolio, and sure enough, they still test them every year.
This. I got screwed on every derivatives question, so I would say I have a 25% chance at best of passing.
OP did you end up passing? I'm at about 105 hours of study now and need to crush it for the next 6-7 weeks to hit 250 hours let alone anywhere near 300. Not feeling totally fucked yet but I'm spending too much time reading and haven't done practice questions yet.
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but 300 hours is reco for level 1. Level 2 is generally more like 500 hours, and having been there...double the level 1 time sounds about righ
I just laughed my way through Fixed Income: Structured Securities and Swaps
Doing L3 here. Definitely enjoyed L2 more. Too much memorization for L3.
Took L1 in June 2007 and passed it. Decided a month or two ago that I'm going to sit for L2 in June 2015 (8 years later!). I looked at the material and it didn't look that hard--got about 50% of questions right on 15 or so questions that I looked at. I think work experience/context help a lot, but I guess I'll see.
Planning on studying for about 340 hours beginning in mid-November of this year.
500 hours is definitely overkill and probably not feasible unless you are unemployed. I'm currently at 270 hours (taking the level II in June) and am feeling very prepared. I think I would probably pass if I took it today. I'm guessing that I will end up with a total of 330-350 hours.
CFA level 1,2 & 3 materials. (Originally Posted: 09/06/2013)
Ahoy fellow monkeys,
I am planning to study CFA in a few months time. I would like to know how long does it take to finish level 1. I am an Accounting and finance Major, more accounting than finance rather. Also, It would be great if anyone could share some materials on L1,L2 & L3.
Cheers.
I think 3 months would be enough.
If you search google long enough you can find the Schweser guides. Most eventually get taken down though BC copywrite infringements, hence why I'm not posting a link
Or you could not be a jackass and actually pay for it. You kind of have to appreciate the irony of stealing study materials for a test with an entire section devoted to ethics.
CFA Level II - Tackling the beast? (Originally Posted: 09/27/2013)
So I took the plunge before the first fee deadline and signed up for Level 2, June 2014. Anyone else just committed themselves to 6 months of misery? Any tips for how to tackle this beast?
Band 9 last year...I made a bags of it in hindsight.
The key is to know all the formulas and do question after question.
I got bogged down in reading the text...questions for the CFA are short....reading reams of text for the CFA exam is like training for a marathon when you plan to run the 100 metres.
This year I am reading the text but taking notes using flashcard...CFA is essentially all just formula and lists...no real meaty theories or deep concepts...my plan is to keep glancing at the Flash cards and get Qbank.
I have heard people say Qbank is not good for level 2...this is BULLSHIT!!!! I listened to this advice last year and I regret it...get Qbank and do questions until you are sick of them.
Only other advice is finish up studying by mid may and focus on Mocks Q's...you do not want to be covering material the days before the exam...
CFA material is not difficult but the questions are...much more practice is need on answering the questions rather than learning the material.
With good exam technique, a solid plan and the requisite dedication and work ethic this exam is crushable!
My 2 cents.
I bought my Level II books about a month ago. I'm trying to push through the CFA readings as quickly as possible, not doing any end of chapter questions this time. Once I finish the material, I'll go back and review, solving in-chapter and end of chapter questions. I'm not sure which supplementary materials I'll use, but I'll definitely do as many questions as possible before the exam.
Coming from someone who passed L II last year, write everything down, then re write, then re re write, then re re re write. You need to to know how to price fixed for floating swaps in your sleep, you need to konw everyway to caclulate FCF from EBIT or NI, you need to know anova tables, you need to know the structure of mortgages and how gets paid based off of prepayment speeds. You need to know the residual income, DDM, H Model, cold. You need to know how to account for full/ partial goodwill, what happens if a FI securitiy is HFT vs. HTM. You need to know the difference between temporal and current methods. If all of this sounds unfamiliar I would honestly read through Schweser first to get a big picture. Some of it will come easy, some will be a bear. Focus on your weak points and go from there.
You're a poet and you don't even know it :).
I can't believe that at one point in time I knew all of these things.
Something I wish I had done better (and more often) last year was to THOROUGHLY review the answers to all practice problems whether they be Qbank questions or practice exam questions. I got better at this as time went on and saw some real benefits, but I wish I had been better earlier in the process.
One thing I will say about the Qbank is that it is not useless by any stretch of the imagination. However, for level 1, the Qbank was invaluable, and could serve as a useful facsimile for practice exams. I did not find this to be the case for level 2. While the Qbank was useful in the early stages of learning the material, I did not find it to be as useful as the practice exams.
Also just signed up for L2 on Wednesday. Hope I'll get enough time to study. Planing to have the notes lying on my desk at work and study while waiting for markups etc.
I signed up. Waiting until December to start studying.
Level 2 is an exercise in brute force. My understanding is that they significantly cut down on the pension accounting which is blessing but I think the key is to just do a ton of practice tests. After awhile you realize that the item sets all follow a particular flow or try to trip you in certain ways.
For L1 and L2 I never did any kind of schweser books, classes etc, just bought the practice tests. For L3 I did a 3 day review class and found it very useful, but maybe because L3 was such a different format with the essays. If you feel like you are on the cusp I would definitely recommend the 3 day review class.
2014 CFA Level II - Best 3rd Party Provider? (Originally Posted: 11/16/2013)
Signed up for Level II in June next year, interested to hear what people would recommend for a 3rd party study provider? I used Schweser exclusively for Level I and found it covered all the content in a good way, but I've heard that they are weak on some FRA / Econ areas in Level II.
I used schweser exclusively for Level 2 as well, it worked pretty well. They are weak in Econ but enough to get you through the tests. Be sure to do Schweser's Practice Tests. They help a lot in figuring out the material.
Schweser worked fine for me on L2. I would suggest leaning on the CFA books a bit more than you might have for L1. EOC and blue box questions definitely help.
I used Schweser exclusively for L1 and L2 and am 2/2. I thought they were a little weak in econ and pm. It definitely seemed like CFAI read the S materials because there was some stuff on the exam that was not in S.
CFA Level 2 - Studying? (Originally Posted: 04/23/2014)
So how is everybody coming along studying for this one so far?
What have you done, how are you finding it and what's the game plan for the next month?
As for me I've been through all the reading and made notes, now focusing on committing key material to memory and practice questions upon practice questions.
Overall Equity, Corp Finance and FRA seem the most straight forward which is great given their weights, Derivatives, Quant and Fixed Income are a pain.
If you don't have a background in statistics, then Quant is a btch. I've always struggled with Econ, but like the L2 since there's a lot less material and more of a focus on calculations (ccy's and arb).
The thing that's killing me is the plethora of formulas you need to memorize for the less weighted sections (alt inv, dervs, FI). If you don't remember how to calculate the optimal residual risk or AFFO for a REIT, then you could easily flush away easy points. I've got a huge stack of notecards I spend at least an hour going thru everyday to constantly refresh myself on topics I'm not comfortable with and just about every important equation. Hate it because it takes away time from the heavily weighted sections.
I'm working my way thru the Kaplan practice exams on the weekends before I start hitting the old CFAI mocks. Will try to work my way thru all the CFAI end of section questions during the weekdays. Just ready for this damn exam to be over.
Good luck!
Yea good luck to you too.
And I completely agree about all the formulas for the small sections, simple stuff but can easily be forgotten and forfeit easy points.
So far I've only used CFAI materials. I completed all the readings earlier this month and have started doing EOC questions, focusing on the more highly-weighted topics. I need to review all the LOS and make some flash cards. Planning on taking 3-4 mocks this next month, then taking some time off work the week of the test. I'm a little worried about this one as it has a reputation as a widowmaker.
Sounds like you guys are getting there.
I've reviewed the material twice, except deriv (which I'm doing now) and quant. There's an unreal amount of info. However, I've heard the same thing; this is no easy feat.
Nonetheless, learned a lot- will resit next year if I have to.
If you haven't got them, I'd recommend the schweser books. I used those and never opened the official books and did fine. You can buy an old set for cheap online (material is the same).
Good luck, the exam isn't easy.
Do not use old materials - they are NOT the same. You can pick up a full updated package on eBay for $40. Use rlemos as the seller.
What's the general perception of CFA in general? Is it really as painful even if you have a finance back ground?
It's still a lot of work, regardless. The amount of material is daunting; plus most monkeys don't know the asset classes, etc. at the level they test for
It's a ballache. Finance background will help when you're totally lost in the exam, but you still have to learn how the CFAI think investing / economics works.
CFA lvl 2 (6 2014 practice exams for Sale (Originally Posted: 09/01/2014)
Selling both of my CFA lvl 2 Schweser practice exam books (unmarked like new).
http://newyork.craigslist.org/mnh/bks/4646784555.html
these are still for sale my apes.
new link to the goods http://newyork.craigslist.org/mnh/bks/4910224705.html
CFA Level II Study Guide insight (Originally Posted: 01/27/2015)
I've been reading AF and WSO for any consensus on study guides for lvl 2.
I haven't found much except that Schweser skips too many topics to be useful as standalone study material.
Does anyone agree or disagree and if the latter, do you have any insight on other providers for lvl 2 study material?
Would also be interested in this. Has anyone used Analyst Success L2?
I am taking the June 2015 exam and would love to see more responses on this matter.
I am taking the June 2015 exam and would love to see more responses on this matter.
I am taking as well. Would be interested to know
Schweser is fine. But feel free to trawl through and supplement with the CFAI books just to make sure you've done "everything"!
deleted
I used only official materials for L2 because I'd heard Schweser sucked for it and passed first try. I used only Schweser for L1.
Focus on getting through the readings as fast as you can, do the end of chapter questions, then at the end do practice tests, and redo the EOCs again until you understand vast majority (I thought this last point was the key as these were closest to the actual exam questions - there are only so many ways they can test the material so getting reps in here helps a lot). There is a ton of shit to cover so don't fall behind. Making a formula sheet / LOS study guide is probably a good idea too if you have the time.
I don't really have an informed opinion of Schweser for L2 since I didn't use it, but it did seem a little light on content the few times I skimmed through it.
I used primarily Schweser when I took L2 and supplemented with CFAI blue boxes and EOCs. I passed easily in my first attempt.
Seconded. I found Schweser only to be adequate to pass L2. If you want to play it safe and have the time, the official curriculum would be best. I'm an idiot and didn't sign up to take the exam until March of last year so my choice to use Schweser was more due to time-constraint/desperation than choice.
Passed L1 and L2 on first attempts using Schweser, and would recommend it (though I'm biased since I didn't have to pay for it). For L2 I read CFAI curriculum only for ethics to not skip any details. For me the biggest part was obtaining as many practice tests as possible and focusing on what I didn't know (questions I got incorrect). Best of luck
Since I find the CFAI curriculum too dry and detailed I have relied on Schweser for Level 1+2 with good success.An important part from my point of view is that you do all Schweser and CFAI EoC questions plus many practice exams, note down where you are underperforming and read up on those topics in the curriculum.
I really only used schweser and passed 1 and 2 with them. I used CFA curriculum end of reading questions to reinforce accounting areas (I failed level II once) not really fault of schweser notes lacking detail, I think they're fine, but lack of tiem committed to preparing. Agree with @guesswho commenting above.
4 Reasons Why I Think the CFA Level II Exam is the Hardest One, and How You Can Prepare (Originally Posted: 03/19/2015)
By Zee
Mirror mirror on the wall, which is the hardest CFA Level of them all?
While opinions differ among us, I think quite a lot of charterholders (if not the majority) believe that Level II is the most challenging CFA Level among all three. I certainly agree. Level II is where many CFA candidates fall the most, and with good reason. And in this article, I'll address four important points why Level II is so challenging to pass.
Read on, and you'll be well prepared compared to the rest of the other first-timers!
Many candidates assume the same routine that worked for them in Level I, not knowing they need to double their efforts.
Level II in the CFA program isn't like Year 2 in university. Simply put, the same approach, routine, or degree of effort that got you through Level I is not going to be enough. I made that mistake in Level II myself and paid the price.
Candidates get thrown off by the fact that Level II has half the questions of Level I, but in fact it can be even more of a time rush.
In Level I, all questions are independent of each other, and are often a lot shorter and more direct compared to Level II and III. In Level II, each of the two exam sessions are comprised of ten vignettes, which is a passage describing a certain scenario, followed by six questions about that scenario.
Vignette-style questions are significantly more time consuming than Level I style questions. Before answering a single question, candidates have to read a passage often longer than a full page, understanding the scenario and digesting important points. When answering questions, you often have to refer back to the passage and reread certain areas. This takes up and incredible amount of time that can only be countered by practice.
Candidates can sometimes make the mistake of thinking Level II will be easier from a time management perspective. Due to the vignette format, this isn't true, and for some candidates it can be even more of a time challenge.
Vignette questions are a lot more challenging than Level I independent questions.
Because of the vignette format, Level II questions go into a lot more detail than Level I. Exam writers now have a full page (and then some) to explain their scenario, and the questions therefore can test multiple concepts and require a lot more thinking or calculation.
Having less questions (and even less vignettes) also makes the exam less 'topic diverse'. What I mean by that is that one vignette can concentrate heavily on a certain topic, and if a candidate is caught out, they stand to lose up to 6 questions worth of points (i.e. 5% of the total exam score). This makes ditching topics a lot more risky compared to Level I.
Knowing which key topics to focus on is more important than ever in Level II.
I personally found Level II to contain a lot more material than Level I, focusing a lot on Financial Reporting and Analysis. In fact, we know from CFA Exam Insights that about 60% of the exam focuses on just 4 topics: Corporate Finance, Equity Investments, Ethics and FRA. The material contained within these heavyweight topics is a lot, and if candidates aren't aware of which are key, they can mismanage their study time by spending too little effort on the key topics.
Remember you can get even more tips on how to approach all 3 CFA Levels by getting our CFA Exam Insights book, available online, or in physical copy through Amazon.
Over to you
If you're taking the CFA Level II this year, keep in mind the above points and you'll avoid the pitfalls that threaten all other first-time Level II candidates. Good luck, and if you have any thoughts or questions just drop them in the comments below!
This article is originally from 300Hours.com. You can read the full article here.
Level 1 = Breadth Level 2 = Depth
The test is the Devil.
Studying for L3 at the moment and really think it is the hardest.
I found with level 2 there is huge depth and breadth but with enough time it really boiled down to knowing formula. Drilled flashcards hard (formula and concepts) and felt confident on the day.
L3 looks much shorter but I find I am spending even more time on each topic and at the end still messing up on questions.
L2 is a bull...massive and fierce but you can grab a hold of it....L3 is a ghost, just cannot get my arms around the fvcker.
+1 L3 is the hardest; however, given you've struggled through 1 and 2 you will put a fuckload more effort into passing it, so the pass rate is higher just because your motivation is stronger as well as your study experience. I loved L3, I actually learned stuff and enjoyed prepping for it, can't say the same about L2... L2 is learning shit by heart, L3 unless you actually understand the concepts you won't really learn much.
Maherj1 good luck!!! I remember finishing that shit a few years back and the relief I got when I got my test scores. Absolute gold.
Studying for L2 right now. The fixed income section is ugly. Hoping to have about 3 weeks to go through the most heavily weighted topics for the second time before starting practice exams.
Level 2 was certainly difficult but I think Level 3 is difficult because it's non-linear. With L2, you know that all questions have an answer based on formulas given. With L3, you have to interpolate relevant information and give "3 reasons" as an answer. It's even more dynamic than L2 in my opinion.
CFA Level 2 Advice (Originally Posted: 09/10/2015)
So, I'm going to be writing the CFA Level 2 in June of 2016, and am honestly pretty intimidated by it. I figure the best starting point is to ask for advice on how to approach it, hopefully from people who have written it recently, because I know few people who have gone through the program recently.
Here's the short story of my background. I finished my undergraduate business degree in Finance and Economics back in April. I wrote the CFA Level 1 exam in June, and didn't really start studying for it hard until a month before the exam, I managed to get about 220 hours of studying in total - and I passed. I figure a big reason to why I passed was due to my undergrad degree considering the 3 topics I got over 70% in were economics, equity markets, and portfolio management - 3 topics which I took courses on at school.
Last week I moved from Toronto to New York for an IB internship, which I'll be working at until mid December. As useful as this internship will be for me moving forward, I'd imagine it won't help me a ton with CFA prep.
For the first exam, I read the CFA curriculum textbooks for book 1 & 2, then switched to the Schweser prep books for 3-6 as I was running out of study time. The reality is, I'm not a genius, and don't expect to be able to pass level 2 simply by reading the textbooks and doing prep questions. I figure a good goal would be an average of 50 hours of study time a month, with more before the exam, hopefully I can hit 500 hours.
I'm basically just asking if anybody has any brilliant advice for me moving forward with studying. Is memorizing equations a great way to go? Memorizing theory? Writing a practice exam every week until I can get 80 on it consistently? etc etc
Thanks for the help.
Just passed LII so here are my two cents:
Ethics doesn't change much from test to test. Go over Quant and PM, but those aren't heavily weighted, so a basic grasp should be good enough. Really study equities, corporate finance and FR&A (your IB internship should help with these to some degree, especially corporate). If you're comfortable with Economics then I would just skim the chapters and make sure you grasp the core concepts. Alternatives and Derivatives can be tricky (especially derivatives). They changed the Fixed Income section since 2014, so go over that and make sure you know their new bond pricing models.
My strategy was to know Ethics, Corporate, Equity Investments and FR&A cold since those put together make up a majority of the exam. I put a lot of time in towards the end on Fixed Income once I figured out they had changed the curriculum (studying w/ 2014 Schweser materials) and that really paid off. I had a passable grasp on the other sections and figured as long as I knew the big topics really well I would pass.
As far as studying goes, the Schweser materials are great to get up to speed and a lot better than the CFA materials. That said, definitely do the CFA materials end of chapter questions. They are more difficult than Schweser and will point out sections of the material that Schweser didn't cover. This was probably the most useful thing I did, especially for fixed income. Writing a whole exam is good every once in a while to expose weak spots. Lastly, I wouldn't just sit down and use flash cards to memorize the formulas, but really try to understand why these formulas are useful.
Hope this helps.
As someone who just passed level 3, this is very good advice. The only part I'd disagree with is the flashcards, for me they were helpful in both level 2 & 3.
First off, you'd better go to analystforum.com to get a comprehensive answer.
Second off, if you only got >70% in 3 subjects, you likely just scraped by and you'll need to put in a lot more effort to pass L2 - this is not to discourage you but to make sure you study and pass the first time ... Think about it this way - the toughest L1 questions are, perhaps, on par with the easiest L2 questions and you are up against the people who passed L1 so the quality of competition is up.
The subjects and weightings aren't much different between L1 and L2. The two things are quite different - first the exam format is basically a 2-3 pg case (=vignette) with 6 questions per case - you need to PRACTICE the format a lot to get comfortable so go over the material once quickly and start practicing the format; second, the level of questions is much higher so you need a much deeper understanding; moreover the questions require longer to solve (i.e a few calculations rather than 1 or 2) and the answer may depend on previous questions in the vignette.
You have a lot of time but I would start studying now. The best IMHO is CFAI materials (and I used them). In any case you must do BB and EOC a few times and track what was easy /hard and what you missed so you'll be able to prep and review intelligently. If you need videos/prep materials I'd say the best IMHO were Elan Guides (even before they got Peter Olinto, now they are golden with him), but I've heard good things about Arif Irfanullah videos as well.
Good luck!
Passed I in 2014, II in 2015. Focus on the CFAI books, and focus on the large topics (Derivatives, Equity, Fixed Income, FRA). Schweser was sort of a waste of time to be honest IMO. Went through them once, but never looked at them again. Make sure you can answer all the 'blue box' questions. I would definitely give yourself a ton of time...I did L1 in 5 months (>70 in all but 2), and Level 2 in 6 months (>70 in all but Ethics).
Voluptatem modi hic rem cum dolorum. Omnis rem quaerat saepe qui iste sequi commodi.
Et fugiat ex voluptas omnis. Cupiditate minima in et.
Iusto reprehenderit nesciunt laudantium nihil beatae et enim. Doloremque at possimus beatae pariatur aperiam voluptate sequi. Molestiae unde ut voluptas qui dignissimos iure doloribus.
A illum repellendus eos harum. Nemo et et et ad eligendi asperiores. Iure eligendi non non. Illo voluptas voluptatem qui omnis earum minima.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Voluptate ratione molestiae velit quia dolorem facilis sed. Harum tempora inventore voluptatem. Occaecati aut harum est quo.
Cumque quis aspernatur eius exercitationem est. Sed non atque tempore consequatur dolores et. Omnis maxime quos itaque dolores. Nam enim incidunt earum fugit id. Sapiente non debitis laboriosam aut. Recusandae inventore accusamus qui autem excepturi quidem.
Dolor eum aut velit at numquam sapiente. Alias doloremque consequatur aliquam. Minima cupiditate beatae a.
Labore aspernatur nulla eius minima autem qui. Rerum provident at aut perferendis voluptatem dicta. Amet non et nobis quia. Optio fugiat sint dolor quis est.
Velit delectus et et ut quo. Dolorem rerum tempore non et quo fugiat. Delectus cupiditate deserunt culpa.
Ex impedit est et ea. Sequi autem explicabo iste ipsum vel tempora magnam. Soluta unde quos est dignissimos omnis qui.
Ad perspiciatis quis enim veritatis est. Neque assumenda minima consectetur suscipit omnis. Optio rerum ut illo voluptas. Temporibus quod quo vel aut qui. Ex sint doloremque cum adipisci quia tempora.
Iusto nesciunt et velit voluptatum. Recusandae officiis sed repellat vel fugit. Officiis dolores et sunt ut ipsam. Exercitationem ut sint asperiores quibusdam.
Magnam maiores consequatur voluptatum. Mollitia adipisci porro ut sit eos in cumque.
Beatae optio inventore voluptatem incidunt earum est et. Sit sed fuga laborum. Corrupti laborum sapiente ea repudiandae sed id vel. Nostrum dolores et quidem ab maiores. Voluptatum doloribus velit neque corrupti non voluptas quis quasi. Omnis itaque vero eos quis iste vel nihil.
Iusto est minima explicabo consequuntur omnis id. Nesciunt porro est et neque molestiae suscipit dolore eos. Aut odit illum quis nihil ut sed. Quisquam voluptatem enim aut sit dolor assumenda corrupti libero. Accusantium ut pariatur veritatis est ducimus voluptatem. Totam et reprehenderit amet expedita quisquam.
Voluptatem dolores labore voluptates sint non dolor minima. Id ratione quia rerum iusto sit. Minima enim aliquam tempore. Officiis quos at nostrum adipisci eum temporibus in.
Qui vero sequi ullam est aut excepturi. Molestiae fuga quo neque reprehenderit. Laboriosam excepturi a alias distinctio. Rem odit maiores quas quia ut voluptatibus sed.
Quia inventore ipsum magnam quasi sit. Id numquam nemo aliquam. Aliquid itaque sit minus facere accusamus laboriosam dolorum distinctio.
Impedit natus vero aliquam iste officiis. Ut repellat cupiditate dolorem quasi qui nulla est. Sequi deserunt fugiat voluptatum consequatur et repellat earum. Eos impedit eligendi consequuntur voluptas ducimus qui aliquid. Nihil ad hic saepe excepturi et nesciunt. Eveniet omnis veritatis qui ea.
Incidunt deleniti nemo voluptatum nostrum. Qui autem deserunt tempore consequatur earum nobis. Repellat neque aliquid debitis vero hic. Sequi doloremque dolore dolores. Iusto ea eum consectetur velit. Rem aut ut sint doloribus neque.
Aspernatur eligendi vel id officiis. Quos recusandae alias porro beatae. Sunt odio non doloremque aut exercitationem incidunt. Mollitia molestias non magni.
Aut aut nobis ratione aut et quo repellendus. Dolorem iure tempora aut culpa. Architecto laudantium sed debitis delectus commodi occaecati reiciendis. Ullam at et natus eligendi. Eum et temporibus ad quibusdam qui dolorem quaerat. Molestias aut expedita nobis ea. Maxime amet officiis voluptatem cum sunt illo.
Beatae quis dolores minus eos. Quam ea dolorem nam amet in qui nam. Consectetur a quisquam inventore repellat et officiis. Aut non quam quidem vel error animi laborum omnis. Quia velit itaque velit laborum sint. Itaque harum molestiae delectus fugit dolor optio.
Molestias sed eius molestias beatae repellendus quia aliquid. Quos ut sed reprehenderit dolore accusamus maiores.