Why is GS TMT considered so great?

What makes it special versus other high-deal flow groups (Healthcare, etc) and say GS Sponsors? I can understand MS M&A since its the best M&A group, etc but why is GS TMT considered so great? Is it just great deal flow?

 

It appears that people are so concerned with PE exit opps 2 years from now, but to me it seems that you can't predict that kind of stuff anyway. These threads seem as useless as the "3.7 from a non-target, what are my chances?" threads.

I think if you choose a good group, such as Goldman TMT, the exit opps will depend more on who you meet (aka networking), your performance as an Analyst, and luck.

 

by GS TMT I mean the technology, media and telecommunications investment banking coverage group at Goldman, Sachs & Co. to clarify

specifically for NY and SF, and by investment banking i mean the division of Goldman, Sachs & Co. focusing on acquisitions, strategic transactions, divestitures, joint takeovers, proxy battles, spinoffs, spinouts, merger of equals, asset sales, debt issuances, IPOs, and secondary offerings.

 
leveRAGE.:
i had written up a semi-serious response, then i remembered how much of a fucking troll you are

Just going to say a firefighter thread...... in b4 shit show

The answer to your question is 1) network 2) get involved 3) beef up your resume 4) repeat -happypantsmcgee WSO is not your personal search function.
 

I have - everyone just says it is great exit ops into PE and considered the best. I was wondering WHY is it considered the best. If it is just dealflow, I think there are many groups with really good deal flow as well who dont get nearly GS TMT's attention.

 

GS TMT is generally said to be the "best" group on the street by those who insist on ranking the groups and banks. The exit opps are directly related to the prestige of a bank/group so since it is thought to be the best, it has great exit opps.

I'm not sure if this is how Goldman does it, but sometimes the TMT is split between offices, so media and telecom will be NY and the more "tech" stuff will be done in SF because of proximity to Silicon Valley.

No, TMT is not usually the "best" group at a bank. But best is subjective. Everyone seems to want to do TMT because it is "sexy"' so maybe in that regard yes. But at many banks the "best" group is the M&A group. Again, meaning more prestigious in this context.

Generally, NYC is the place to be for banking. However, in tech (and also healthcare), SF is the place to be.

Modeling/quantitative experience will be phenomena and extensive. But probably not any different than any other top flight group on the street.

Also, just FYI, that is probably the hardest group on the street to get into. Not to put you down or anything, but unless your engineering school is MIT, you will be extremely hard pressed to get into that group.

 

GS TMT for me is not a great groups

People AlWAYS use GS TMT to catapult themselves to something different ... whether its megafund PE or something else ... so there's loads of churn in that group

I guess its good if you're 100% sure u wanna do PE but if you wanna stay put and learn from ppl with a vested interest in the group ... I don't think its that fantastic

That said - its a great group for thsoe very same reasons if that's what you're looking for

 

I love all the comments. Half the people think he's gonna grow up to be some kind of awful, world-raping monster and the others think he's God's greatest gift to the Caucasian race.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

LOL

"Look, you're my best friend, so don't take this the wrong way. In twenty years, if you're still livin' here, comin' over to my house to watch the Patriots games, still workin' construction, I'll fuckin' kill you. That's not a threat, that's a fact.
 
Chinouk35:

GS TMT is generally said to be the "best" group on the street by those who insist on ranking the groups and banks. The exit opps are directly related to the prestige of a bank/group so since it is thought to be the best, it has great exit opps.

I'm not sure if this is how Goldman does it, but sometimes the TMT is split between offices, so media and telecom will be NY and the more "tech" stuff will be done in SF because of proximity to Silicon Valley.

No, TMT is not usually the "best" group at a bank. But best is subjective. Everyone seems to want to do TMT because it is "sexy"' so maybe in that regard yes. But at many banks the "best" group is the M&A group. Again, meaning more prestigious in this context.

Generally, NYC is the place to be for banking. However, in tech (and also healthcare), SF is the place to be.

Modeling/quantitative experience will be phenomena and extensive. But probably not any different than any other top flight group on the street.

Also, just FYI, that is probably the hardest group on the street to get into. Not to put you down or anything, but unless your engineering school is MIT, you will be extremely hard pressed to get into that group.

Is it hard to get into? Yes, however, it is not impossible. You do not have to go to MIT to get into GS TMT. I know some kid from Baruch who got into GS TMT, and trust me, I was shocked when I found out.

 
I am a sophomore in an engineering school, who is trying to learn more about ibanking. I am specifically interested in GS TMT.

In other words, you know nothing about the banking industry but you've read enough WSO to be a prestige whore?

Forget about GS TMT and the difference between SF and New York. Read about the industry first before wasting your time with these questions.

 

Thanks for your response. So someone in TMT New York can't get exposure to tech banking then?

Where are the financial models built by the junior bankers? In NY or in SF? As I understand, SF is a satellite office for most banks so I thought that maybe the actual technical work is done in New York?

Secondly besides Goldman TMT what are some other solid tech groups? And where are they based - New York or SF?

 

inassessable - i understand why people like it - because of exits into PE. But WHY does it have such good exits to PE? if its just deal experience why dont groups with equally good deals like HC get the same glory?

 

Ohhhh so by TMT you mean tech, media and telecom? I thought you were saying that the OP has TMT (Too much time) because he/she is an obvious troll for posting this kind of question.

Pretty women make us BUY beer. Ugly women make us DRINK beer.
 

I think he's going to be both.

"You stop being an asshole when it sucks to be you." -IlliniProgrammer "Your grammar made me wish I'd been aborted." -happypantsmcgee
 

awwwwwww so adorable!!

@1'36" breaking out some breakdance footwork hahaha

I don't accept sacrifices and I don't make them. ... If ever the pleasure of one has to be bought by the pain of the other, there better be no trade at all. A trade by which one gains and the other loses is a fraud.
 
Best Response

Obviously a group with seriously good deal flow... they're advising on Yahoo! / Microsoft, and recently have done other high-profile deals like BEA / Oracle, Business Objects / SAP, Vivendi / Activision etc.

Saying it's intense is a massive understatement. Be prepared to not only drink from the firehose but to swim in a pool of water made from the firehose and then be forced to drink the pool.

Really really competitive to get in but good exit opportunities if you can do it.

At the same time, I know people from GS TMT who have gone on to do things other than work at Silver Lake or other big name PEs/HFs... people who have done startups, gone to VCs etc. so there are lots of varied people.

 
chubbybunny:
stop being such a troll firefighter, you're wasting bandwidth on this site.
Hey pot, you met kettle?
If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
 
rodneymullen:
and lose the attitude (sorry to be blunt)

+1 rod,

you come on here asking for advice, and the way you ask is "how the fuck do you even..."

answer - you don't

you go straight to KPMG audit and spend your life a bitter jerk

 

[quote=dosk17]Obviously a group with seriously good deal flow... they're advising on Yahoo! / Microsoft, and recently have done other high-profile deals like BEA / Oracle, Business Objects / SAP, Vivendi / Activision etc.

Saying it's intense is a massive understatement. Be prepared to not only drink from the firehose but to swim in a pool of water made from the firehose and then be forced to drink the pool.

Really really competitive to get in but good exit opportunities if you can do it.

At the same time, I know people from GS TMT who have gone on to do things other than work at Silver Lake or other big name PEs/HFs... people who have done startups, gone to VCs etc. so there are lots of varied people.

So what is it about this group that makes it so revered?

Is the dealflow so overwhelming/high profile that you're guaranteed to have a slew of quality/complicated/interesting deals under your belt?

MD's go to bat for you when it comes time to leave?

Something else?

What's the biggest differentiator/driver when it comes to quality analyst gigs?

 

its like the old Lehman / Barcap Nat Res team ... its reputed #1 on street in terms of comp, deal flow etc and you get to work with some big hitters and the market was hot so why not

Tech market is back again so ppl are flocking - fair-weather fans

 
non-target <span class=keyword_link><a href=/finance-dictionary/what-is-the-bulge-bracket-BB><abbr title=bulge bracket&#10;>BB</abbr></a></span> Banker:
chubbybunny:
GS TMT group makes about 52.36% of GS revenue (down from 74.33% pre-2008). But as the economy improves, there will be more deal flow so expect that number to rise, albeit slowly.

Dude, did u actaully check the financial statement for this question?!

*hint sarcasm

 

In general, TMT sector division is nowhere near as simple as Tech in SF and M&T in NY and you won't truly understand it without speaking to someone in the group. A mega deal sourced out of SF that utilizes firm resources throughout different groups in different regions could easily end up with the model being run by an senior analyst in NY simply because of how long these processes usually take (meaning you'll see turnover in junior resources over the life of a deal), how involved a VP or associate is (and subsequently which region they are based in and who their favorite analysts are), involvement of bank executives, and so on.

I don't know anything specific to GS's group, but you should choose by where you would like to live and work first and foremost. Tech can be split up into different subsectors that may be covered by bankers in different offices: internet, digital media, payment services, etc. Hard to give a generalized answer.

 

.......

IBD as a whole doesn't even make that much for the firm. If you are talking about IBD specific, groups such as NR, Industrials and FIG actually brought in more revenue last year I believe. It does fluctuate though, regardless ton of deal flow in the group. If you're recruiting for it don't worry about how much revenue it brings in for the bank, let the MDs do that.

 

I don't think there are too many mega deals in Tech. A few yes, but in general tech deals tend to be small. I am pretty sure the GS SF guys model and execute their own deals rather than just pass them on to the NY analysts. Deals like FB IPO, acquisition of Skype by Microsoft, recent acquisition of Nokia Mobile by Microsoft were all out of SF. Sure there is a fair amount of cross location resources that get leveraged, but it doesn't mean that GS SF is a satellite office. In fact they actually have a larger team for TMT in SF than in NY, with more junior analysts on the roster. Tech dealflow is pretty much 100% controlled from SF I think.

West coast bankers feel free to correct me.

 

Possibly, but my response wasn't specific to GS. The firm I summered at some tech subsector coverage out of NY and other subsectors out of SF.

For the off chance that this guy actually gets an offer from GS and is placed in TMT, then by all means, disregard my post and please ask someone actually in the group. Bottom line is that even if you're covering tech, you're still working in finance at the end of the day, and unless you're bent on working in tech PE or VC (in which case, the obvious choice is SF), then pick your office based on where you actually want to live and work.

 

Nice troll

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 
InassessableTangents:
I'm 90% positive tehir tech team is involved in tech c ompanies

you're telling me people like JA Solar, Trina Solar, LDK are covered by their nat res team? ur kidding urself

Why is that hard to believe?

 

Magni id sint numquam quis cupiditate sit quia. Dicta voluptatem dolor ipsa aperiam dolorum porro officiis. Error architecto mollitia quidem placeat voluptas ea occaecati. Eum minima consequatur praesentium minus fugiat tempora debitis. Qui quibusdam quia similique expedita. Reprehenderit maiores architecto distinctio adipisci fugiat quo.

Qui voluptate dolorem atque ut. Ducimus id dolores eaque doloremque aspernatur qui a est. Esse voluptatem debitis perferendis. Dolores alias iure adipisci possimus et sit.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

Facere ut ipsa distinctio voluptas voluptatum delectus aut. Quia accusantium optio voluptatem alias aperiam expedita qui. Deleniti eius aut cupiditate qui est.

Et non ea assumenda aut. Accusamus quae ab numquam.

"You rarely have time for everything you want in this life, so you need to make choices. And hopefully your choices can come from a deep sense of who you are." - Mister Rogers
 

Vel et commodi ratione ex. Doloremque sunt vel provident sed esse. Soluta quos natus quia qui qui voluptatibus placeat. In qui eos optio consequatur vel non.

Ut vel et consequuntur. Saepe delectus dolorem labore asperiores velit molestiae quod. Eaque nesciunt consectetur adipisci eligendi. Fugiat aut id at magnam.

Ex et enim enim corporis pariatur in et. Autem iste dicta dicta aspernatur rerum consequatur est. Consectetur repellendus quibusdam enim quia. Doloremque unde sequi blanditiis explicabo eum sit. Et minima perferendis laborum ut omnis natus.

Est voluptates temporibus ab cum tenetur sint laborum. Possimus consequuntur et molestiae impedit dignissimos harum consequatur. In dolores aliquid culpa dolores ut. Esse molestias eos quaerat ullam molestias.

 

Quibusdam nulla quia quidem voluptatem impedit vero sint. Qui fuga ipsum sit quos. Non aut et dolor quia aut. Aut ullam a vel voluptate sunt.

Necessitatibus rerum maiores omnis distinctio unde quis dolorem. Et sapiente veniam molestias temporibus tempore. Repellendus aut omnis dolores omnis dignissimos.

Tempora dolores expedita sunt ut eos. Esse dolores quo corrupti vel consequatur molestiae.

Non est ut esse magni. Aperiam in aspernatur tempore aut quia vitae et nihil. Atque eveniet dolore et modi aspernatur natus dolorum.

 

Excepturi perferendis quae vero quia. Sed impedit nulla in quis. Molestias eos qui qui quisquam exercitationem quia deleniti.

Porro beatae aliquid minima qui autem cupiditate tenetur. Eum quidem quaerat veritatis placeat alias eum ipsam. Odit mollitia et exercitationem consequatur. Rem natus a quia et eum quam. Rerum eius assumenda eum saepe omnis itaque et quidem.

Ratione nesciunt autem voluptates unde. Et molestiae sed aut.

 

Dolore ipsa eligendi vero nihil. Temporibus commodi eum esse voluptas illum totam quod et. Ullam tempore aliquid nostrum.

Voluptatem soluta perferendis est quidem. Iusto quibusdam aut reiciendis totam ut tempora rerum. Excepturi sequi suscipit velit nihil id. Deserunt repellat ut quam beatae consequatur quia. Laudantium nulla autem beatae deleniti soluta et quia. Illum autem modi tenetur molestiae laudantium consequatur omnis.

Hic qui consequatur cumque quia eos assumenda eum ut. Rem et sit suscipit molestiae. Est sunt voluptatem voluptate. Repudiandae soluta voluptates quod harum. Fugiat reprehenderit quia debitis eum ea.

Et nam eligendi totam est est voluptatibus. Et voluptatem ipsum qui dolores soluta reprehenderit ut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”