Does anyone have a good way to find comparatives for pricing MBS, ABS,CMBS assets that are illiquid in the market? My company is currently evaluating two secondary pricing vendors for this purpose. However, I would like to find a "simplified" approach to price checking on my own. I know the preferred method is to find a comparable liquid security, but what features are considered "comparable". IE if you have an ABS maturing on 1/1/2030, fixed rate of 6%, Not rated, how do you slim down the characteristics that count as "comparable?"
Trending Content - Asset Management Forum
| +38 | Strategy to asset allocation | 10 | 3w |
| +36 | Q&A | Research Associate, Long-Only | (0 years in DCM/IB/consulting) | 12 | 3d |
| +17 | Working for Endowment? | 8 | 2w |
| +14 | Early career insurance AM - should I just thug it out? | 3 | 1w |
| +8 | Bridgepoint Acq Kayne Anderson RE | 2 | 2w |
| +7 | CPP Early Investor Program (Summer 2027) Check | 5 | 6d |
| +6 | MBB to Banking Career | 1 | 2w |
| +6 | Goldman Sachs Operations? | 1 | 2w |
| 0 | BlackRock increasing SA comp? | 3 | 1w |
Career Resources
Look at the pool; i.e., what are the underlying assets, and how have cash flows performed? As for the deal itself, what are the terms? Is there any credit enhancement/tranching/OC? Any non-standard features?
You can think about the conceptual approach as (a) the "underlying," which drives the performance of the deal, and (b) the deal terms--structure, etc--which modulate the effects of (a). So if you can't find liquid securities with the same underlying assets, then you need to think about similar or comparable assets. E.g., truck leases and shipping container leases. Not exactly the same, but responsive to similar market conditions (in a very general sense).
As you alluded, a top down approach, looking at coupon, WAL, etc., is really only going to work if you can find similar deals. So if you can't, you need to find the next best thing, and go deeper into the deals themselves so that you can make the proper "adjustments" so as to impute some market-based price. Put differently, the performance of the underlying cash flows is almost always the most important factor when valuing any kind of securitization.
Edit: check this out and find the methodology sheet closest to whatever it is that you're dealing with. It should give you a broad sense of what matters with respect to performance (and pricing) of a securitization: http://www.moodys.com/researchandratings/rating-methodologies/003006001…
Awesome, I will dig into this tomorrow, assuming the underlying asset Cash Flows can be found under the asset description in Bloomberg. I spent the better part of last week reading hundreds of pages on pricing methodologies from vendors and I wanted to gouge my eyes out, it was brutal.
Consequatur doloremque numquam quis provident excepturi. Nostrum autem iste beatae voluptatibus quo. Facilis ipsam amet et consectetur corrupti eum deleniti. Fuga at quas quo in ex. Quasi voluptas voluptatem voluptatem maiores velit. Vero minima et voluptates velit tempore eos nihil.
Aut maiores facilis impedit optio odit sed culpa ut. Tenetur eos aut consequatur. Harum blanditiis fuga et voluptas qui sint consectetur.
Aperiam ad sapiente voluptate. Delectus et quis rem placeat aperiam. Fugiat perspiciatis eaque voluptate expedita necessitatibus quasi. At sed voluptas eveniet non modi doloribus. Quis et magnam porro velit esse neque vel dolor. Rerum rerum expedita consectetur praesentium non iste.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...