2nd Round Interview with McKinsey

Hi Guys,

I'm doing my second round interview with McKinsey next week (Business Analyst) and was wondering if anyone has any insight into the difference between first and second round cases.

Are they different, and if so, in what regard?

Thanks.

21 Comments
 

Thanks aspiringconsultant. I have emailed my McK alumnus that coached me for the first round. He has yet to get back to me, but was also hoping for a bit of perspective from like minded peers.

 
Best Response

You will not be using a flip chart or presenting any materials (unless this is outside US?). But definitely not in any of the US offices.

Btw, just to be clear, when you say "second round", are you referring to the final round interview? I ask b/c there are sometimes 3 rounds, with the first round being a phone screen, for candidates from non-target schools.

Assuming you are referring to final round interviews, they are relatively similar to first rounds. You will do +/- 3 interviews with some mix of junior partners (Associate Principals), partners (Principals), and senior partners (Directors). Each interview will be roughly 50% behavioral and 50% case.

The behavioral portion will be identical to your first round, with the partner asking you to talk through a personal experience in great detail. It will likely focus on leadership. It is okay to use a story you also used in your first round, but try not to do that for all 3 interviews.

The case portion will be slightly different than first rounds. In first rounds, the cases are very scripted, with specific questions that each candidate is asked. In final rounds, the partners can ask whatever they want, or do any case they want. Typically the cases will be more open-ended and less structured. Note that that does not mean you should be less structured in your responses.

Keep in mind what the partner is really testing for. By this point, you've proven yourself as intelligent. The partner is testing whether (a) you have the maturity, poise, and professionalism to sit across the table from the CEO of his client and hold your own, and (b) you have the creativity and problem-solving prowess to succeed at the firm.

Hope that helps. Good luck.

 
DagwoodDeluxeYou will not be using a flip chart or presenting any materials (unless this is outside US?). But definitely not in any of the US offices.

Btw, just to be clear, when you say "second round", are you referring to the final round interview? I ask b/c there are sometimes 3 rounds, with the first round being a phone screen, for candidates from non-target schools.

Assuming you are referring to final round interviews, they are relatively similar to first rounds. You will do +/- 3 interviews with some mix of junior partners (Associate Principals), partners (Principals), and senior partners (Directors). Each interview will be roughly 50% behavioral and 50% case.

The behavioral portion will be identical to your first round, with the partner asking you to talk through a personal experience in great detail. It will likely focus on leadership. It is okay to use a story you also used in your first round, but try not to do that for all 3 interviews.

The case portion will be slightly different than first rounds. In first rounds, the cases are very scripted, with specific questions that each candidate is asked. In final rounds, the partners can ask whatever they want, or do any case they want. Typically the cases will be more open-ended and less structured. Note that that does not mean you should be less structured in your responses.

Keep in mind what the partner is really testing for. By this point, you've proven yourself as intelligent. The partner is testing whether (a) you have the maturity, poise, and professionalism to sit across the table from the CEO of his client and hold your own, and (b) you have the creativity and problem-solving prowess to succeed at the firm.

Hope that helps. Good luck.

Yup I was referring to a non-U.S. office. It's kind of interesting that they have different interview procedures in various regions. I would have though that it would be standardized globally.

Thanks for the additional insights!

 

In general the final round is testing your ability to, as the cliche goes, 'think outside the box'. Can you offer interesting and 'different' insights, all backed by logic and some form of reasonable hypothesis? Can you impress your interviewers and prove that not only are you mature and can talk well, but seem like an all round decent guy they wouldn't mind being stuck in an airport with? Do you show the requisite quant skills as well?

A lot of different factors, but the underlying point here is that you should really focus on making sure you're on your A-game case interview-wise.

 

All of my McK interviews were the same format. No surprises, nothing got harder or trickier as the process went on. If you succeeded in the first round, you have the skills you need to get through to the end, but beware! You are competing with dozens of people for one spot. Be the best. Practice.

 

Interviews are generally in a similar format (or try to follow), but with AP and P. Cases can be more open ended, sometimes they are not, which gives you reason to: go over your material such as frameworks and such and make them more flexible/make sure you are familiar with more than the typical profit framework. Chance for you to talk or add more creative comments/suggestions (by creative, stuff in your area of expertise might help, say like if you like marketing, you would have more chance to talk about marketing since there is less likely to be one set solution.) So all in all, for prep (which is probably what your more concerned about), would be to read more (McK Quarterly, strategy articles, case books) , organize your thoughts more (come up with ways to organize different articles, ideas, etc), and less mock interviews since you can't really prep for this type as easily

 

Good luck! I'll be taking McK PST soon in October, hope I'll do well enough land an interview

My formula for success is rise early, work late and strike oil - JP Getty
 

Thanks man! That's how I also felt about it. I don't think Case In Point is that great, it's too general. I think LOMS and case interview success are probably the most interesting, definitely LOMS, he indeed has the free stuff on the site, which may be sufficient.

I have my next one coming up in 5 days, any tips for other resources (books though?). I wil drill down a bit more with friends, thats a valid point!

 
DavidSSomeone made a solid post a week or two ago detailing the entire McKinsey recruiting process, try and find it.

He deleted it shortly thereafter due to concerns of being identified, so don't waste your time searching.

 

Thanks for the info, I unfortunately didnt find it!

In any case I have got an offer from both BCG and McKinsey!! So its time to celebrate!

Thanks for the help here!

And to the many many people who have sent me a PM to send them the LOMS program of Victor Cheng, or the ebook of Case Interview Success, I recommend you to buy it yourself. It's not always, but it is an investment in your career. These guys also worked for it.

Good luck,

Mihael

 

Magni reiciendis ut doloribus quis quo. Et fuga aperiam inventore et in et ea. Totam enim ut sapiente ut non.

Quidem reprehenderit totam eos. Corporis enim voluptas rerum repellat repellendus voluptates. Eos nihil iste eos et. Quos aut omnis odit ipsum dignissimos qui.

Omnis dignissimos corrupti sapiente maxime. Omnis aspernatur qui repellat sequi suscipit. Ipsa ipsa nesciunt enim incidunt cupiditate.

Amet qui eligendi tenetur ipsa a dolorem illum sunt. Recusandae pariatur eveniet quia voluptatem magnam id itaque. Reprehenderit tempora molestiae inventore asperiores.

Winners bring a bigger bag than you do. I have a degree in meritocracy.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Consulting

  • Boston Consulting Group 99.5%
  • Bain & Company 99.0%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.5%
  • Oliver Wyman 98.0%
  • LEK Consulting 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Consulting

  • Cornerstone Research 99.5%
  • Bain & Company 99.0%
  • Boston Consulting Group 98.5%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.0%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.5%
  • Boston Consulting Group 99.0%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.5%
  • Oliver Wyman 98.0%
  • LEK Consulting 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Consulting

  • Partner (4) $361
  • Principal (30) $294
  • Director/MD (58) $274
  • Vice President (53) $247
  • Engagement Manager (111) $232
  • Manager (167) $172
  • 2nd Year Associate (185) $142
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (115) $135
  • Senior Consultant (354) $132
  • Consultant (635) $122
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (162) $121
  • 1st Year Associate (575) $121
  • NA (16) $114
  • Engineer (6) $114
  • 2nd Year Analyst (390) $104
  • Associate Consultant (175) $100
  • 1st Year Analyst (1151) $90
  • Intern/Summer Associate (205) $83
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (625) $67
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”