I work in the industry and want to provide my perspective to those that care. This is related to restructuring consulting in the USA. List is alphabetical and not in any order of prestige. Focus is primarily RX (not all the other random ass services they provide). And is RX consulting not RX banking focused.
- AlixPartners
- Alverez & Marsal
- Berkeley Research Group
- Conway MaKenzie
- FTI Consulting
There are tons of other great firms but I see these folks on the largest pitches consistently. Your thoughts?
any chance you could articulate which of these firms specialize in which industries and/or debtor/creditor side work? seems this site could use more info on this industry altogether given the macro climate
Absolutely. Not all engagements are public so I am speaking generally here. And of course there are exceptions. No way I could be completely comprehensive but anyone should call me out if there is something clearly erroneous (i dont think there is). These 5 firms are known for their debtor side work.
Firms are changing every year. FTI would have been higher on the list but there has been a mass exodus in the last few years with a bunch of folks leaving for competitors. If you asked me a few years ago, i would have put Deloitte on the list given their volume but similarly, that group scattered and as a whole is not very strong in the RX space anymore.
I'm just shooting off things that come to mind right now. Feel free to ask anything specific if you want a more specific answer.
Thanks for sharing. I am an international student T20 MBA.
1) Can you please share which one of these firms sponsor? 2) What is the comp like at the Post MBA level and what level do they recruit at? 3) Is RX Consulting to RX Banking possible? If yes, which of these firms is best for that?
Thank you.
Not sure how familiar you are with the market when FTI has won the 2 largest company side deals this year (frontier communications and hertz) along with other prime company side deals (GNC, 24 hour fitness) among many others. There are very clearly a top 3 then everyone else. FTI wins almost every major prime creditor side deals it pitches or isn’t engaged as company advisor.
A&M + K&E = the debtor side special. You’ll see those two partnered up very regularly in RX.
Deloitte basically blew up a lot of CRG (which they bought during the tail of the last recession). A lot of them have moved back to CRG 3.0, aka CR3, all Big 4 firms have restructuring practices, along with a numbers of the top 10 CPA firms. The size and focus of the practices vary quite a bit.
What is the scope of work as a creditor-side RX consultant? How would it differ from the work that a creditor-side banker would do?
Do these firms recruit out of undergrad? How is their undergrad recruiting process different than strategy consulting (e.g., MBB, OW, LEK)?
Completely different. not comparable at all. none of those are competitors. mckinsey does have a small turnaround group but i've heard various stories not all of them good.
Lots of undergrad recruiting but the groups are so small that they do not go nation wide like everyone the big strategy consulting firms. you usually have to be in key cities like LA, Boston, NYC, Chicago and come out of a strong finance program. RX does not recruit out of places like stanford, harvard, etc. Great schools but not the target for an RX group. other than that, network the hell out of the contacts that went to your school and are in the industry. go on linkedin and take a look at people's background in the same city. it'll be very apparent which schools they target.
generally not a lot of MBA recruiting unless you already have a background in RX.
Alix is the only one that is a litte different, they are top heavy and do not have as many jr's. a lot more exprienced / industry people.
How common is it for someone in RX consulting to switch to RX banking, or vice versa? have heard of some going from RX consulting to work at RX ops teams within PE, but curious if there is ever any overlap between consulting and banking for rx in either direction
It happens. Usually folks move on outside of RX vs bounce around within RX. A couple folks have left consulting to go into the banking side (same skill set different work product). Less banking into consulting but i definitely see it. not uncommon to see folks go into PE side. a lot of credit funds and yes a decent amount of RX ops but you do not see a lot of jr's getting that opportunity.
i'll add that RX is such a relationship business. over the last couple years i've been offered a job by a competitor to join their credit side advisory, a client to the VP of M&A, 2 different RX IB's. All of these contacts I made while finishing up an engagement.
Care to elibrate why you chose to stay instead of pursuing the other opportunities you mentioned above?
bump on the response below. Why not go from RX Consulting to RX IB?
would you say a decent number of rx people go on to corporate roles? seems like a normal exit for folks given the heavy accounting & operational duties of the job.
a lot of folks leave for industry but can usually land a pretty good role vs a "typical" fp&a role. Not sure how you're defining "accounting & operational". I'd say most people have a good understanding of accounting but they are not bunch of transaction services / CPAs. That is probably true for most corporate finance jobs.
Do CPAs (or auditors/tax public accountants w/o cpa) have a good shot at lateraling over? I've heard that most people working in RX consulting are experienced hires from other fields (finance/accounting/industry), which jobs are the most transferable?
I have definitely seen exits to the C-suite of firm clients
Curious if any of the folks in Rx consulting have an idea of pro's / con's with the boutique firms vs the "Big 3"? I'm currently in TAS non big-4 (with audit background - Big 4) and looking to make the move to Rx.
I've been reached out to for a boutique (or at least isnt referred to in any of the Rx threads - anyone heard o Mackinac Partners?) and A&M. Looks like comp is a little higher at A&M but both are generous bonus packages. Assume the work / hours are pretty comparable? Anything else that differentiates the two? Appreciate any input
I do no have experience at both big and boutique so hopefully others will chime in. A&M is one of the big 3 in the space (FTI, Alix, AM). The breath of experience you'll find at a big firm will be impossible to find at a smaller boutique. A lot of smaller boutiques came about from sr partners from the big 3 breaking off to do their own thing. You'll still have good work but the experience will be very different. You wont have the big analyst classes, trainings, firm events, etc. I know some boutiques that have a great culture and certainly are not lacking in any of those areas so you'll have to do your own diligence to find out what you're looking for. That said, a big firm may come with big company politics / structure - not a bad thing but maybe not what someone wants depending on the stage of their career.
I've heard of Mackinac but have no experience with them. If you look at the partners there, you'll see a handful came from reputable firms. If you go boutique and want to go to a bigger firm after a year or two, there is a pretty good chance you'll get interviews from all the big firms as this specific experience is not always easy to find. From my experience, the firm jumping does not happen as much in this space as say a big 4 audit / tax type environment.
Not sure what level you are in your career but if I was more jr., I'd try to go for a big firm and leverage everything they have to offer your career. A&M has a very good reputation. Good luck and let us know how it goes!!
I have seen Mackinac in my market, they are a legitimate firm, but I have not had interactions with them on a deal.
On Mackinac versus A&M, the difference would be like Big 4 versus, Grant, RSM, BDO, a lot more middle market work and smaller public companies. A&M definitely does middle market as well, but work on massive headline deals that really drive the firm.
anyone care to describe how different the day to day responsibilities of rx consulting are versus rx banking?
There is certainly some overlap and they work very closely together on most projects I've been involved with. Very generally speaking.
Consulting - You're traveling every week onsite at the client building out their operational plan. Cash flow, business plan, turnaround / performance improvement plan. You're helping management evaluate bids and financial terms and giving them the day to day guidance of going through a distressed time. You're helping to craft a turnaround business plan that can go to market. If it goes to BK, you're providing the day to day coordination to get the company and all he advisors aligned so that nothing slips.
Banking - You're FINRA licensed. You're trying to help them find a capital structure solution. Finding new financing, investors, running a process. Consultants can help facilitate but this is really marketing of securities and is banker type work. Probably means you're up until 4am building slides haha!
Hope that is helpful.
anybody from UK whos in the field have any opinions about THM Partners?
seem to be a top boutique but most people dont have big 4 rx background either though at same time.
my understanding is they do a lot of CRO work...
Bump, further insight into thm would be brilliant (https://thmpartners.com/)
They have a pretty good reputation.
Saw their work products on a project and it was good quality.
At least from what I've seen, BRG and Conway MacKenzie tend to compete for deal sizes that are smaller than the FTI/A&M/Alix. Seems like M III and Ankura are more prominent on larger deals than BRG/Conway.
deleted
Adipisci eius dignissimos commodi voluptatem eum. Ab dignissimos aut et aut. Aut tempora aut totam ipsum asperiores hic incidunt cupiditate. Delectus sequi deleniti qui enim illo eos corporis. Unde aut illo rerum ut provident. Blanditiis provident harum ut odit aut. Doloribus quia quas dolorem ea dolor.
Ut dolores hic qui nesciunt nam aliquid. Provident sed veritatis est repellendus ratione. Dolorem impedit repellat explicabo minima. Nulla consectetur et et.
Voluptas accusamus perferendis hic nesciunt accusamus. Quos dolores quis error corrupti temporibus quia dolorem. Iusto error corrupti nostrum distinctio. Dicta provident est adipisci optio saepe sit.
Rerum commodi consequuntur non et. Beatae alias consectetur alias et. Id ut et voluptatem quisquam id nam voluptate.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Dolorem voluptatibus dolores quibusdam molestiae nostrum tenetur. Ut vel harum rem autem eaque nemo unde enim. Similique et vero ut.
Velit sunt quos totam dolor hic quis. Eos odit vero consequatur iusto aut. Iure cum aut recusandae sunt. Et ex ipsam qui totam.
Officia officiis id ut suscipit dolores voluptatibus. Ut aspernatur sequi et molestiae. Optio sit molestias nesciunt ad eos quia quos esse.
Molestiae laudantium quidem repellendus neque. Repudiandae officiis occaecati laboriosam tempora quo. Adipisci animi voluptas accusamus doloribus molestias sit in. Expedita et labore ullam aperiam nam.