Jul 22, 2021
120 Comments
 

To clarify, only all-senior funds (sprinkled with same safe 2L) have back leverage. Very few leverage providers will give an advance rate on anything junior to 2L and even the advance rate given on 2L is 20-40% max, in my experience. Have recently gone through the convos with a handful of them during a fundraise. 

Life is more than dollars
 

Have heard the same on comp (excl. carry) being the same across major strategies at MFs. Credit is a key pillar of many MFs' strategy by now - just look at Blackstone Credit as an example.

The carry component and differential vs equity colleagues is not always trivial to assess. Generally speaking, carry in PE will be higher assuming same fund size / fee earning AUM, given PC has management fee of 1.0-1.5% with 10-15% profit share (depending on fund strategy) vs 2/20 for PE, and assuming PC will yield ~10% while PE will yield ~15% both over 5y investment period. 

Differential will decrease once factoring in that there is often fewer investment professionals per $ under management in credit, i.e. VP at MF Credit will possibly get more % of carry vs PE VP. 

Others please chime in.

 
Most Helpful

It's not trivial to assess the difference in total $s, but I think its important to understand how long it takes to get carry and how you actually realize it. You get it vested over a 5-7 year fund, often it vests on a straight line, so you need to stay there for at least 4-5 years for it to be worth anything and maybe the fund takes 7-10 to actually payout the realizations from start to finish. All the while, you are working 70-80+ hour work weeks (while the credit guys may be pulling in 50-60) and getting your weekends/life blown up. There's also many strategies within credit that may not have carry like the public side, or at APO credit they are *mostly* public side and do some private side deals, likely not getting carry that means much.

So yeah carry is not insignificant, but its tied heavily to your longevity there and takes a ton of time to be realized. I would bet that the amount of people that fully see the carry out is likely less than you think.

End of day my takeaway is - cash comp very similar, carry higher in PE but comes with harder lifestyle/hours and requires longevity to actually see it realized and receive it.

 

That’s all spot on.

Only difference I would flag is that PC is way more scalable. Putting $1-2bn to work per year in PE is quite a task vs PC guys parachute in when the deal is already pretty likely to get done and they get diligence materials served to them on a silver platter… so putting $1-2bn of PC to work is like a 4-6 month affair.

I’ll let one of you sketch out the math. But what’s the per year average carry spun off for $1.5bn PE at a 5 year 2.0x MOIC vs. $4bn PC at a 3-4 year 1.3x MOIC?

Im guessing it’s pretty close to parity. Now add to that much better lifestyle in PC but far less interesting and it’s largely a wash. Be that as it may, career-wise PE is still > PC by Wall Street standards. For all intents and purposes PC is servicing PE and are largely getting managed by our cap mkts guys, who no one really respects.

 

Following. Thanks for creating the thread. Interested in hearing specific numbers at shops.

 

Currently on the debt side at a debt fund and looking to transition to the equity side (which fits better with my personal style of investing). Generally speaking, are the hours going to be worse? I've heard that due to there being fewer equity deals, equity professionals on average work on fewer deals at any given time, which somewhat counterbalances the more "hands on" nature of equity.

 

PE is just much more labor and time intensive. Hit rate of deals looked at vs deals done is quite low. Involvement during the investment hold is a substantial part of the job. Networking with management companies is big. Developing and building out investment themes/ideas is hugely time consuming. Diligencing and structuring a deal is quite intensive. The risk profile through the equity means you have to be waaaay more paranoid and rigorous.

 

I mean if you look on the search bar, you’ll see data points for most firms. Think mid 200s all in first year comp is pretty typical for larger private credit funds. At certain firms, comp can stretch first year to something like 300 - 350. Expect at those places to have about a 50k increase in comp yearly through time you hit director / principal level.

 

If anybody wants to DM me, I am pulling a spreadsheet together for private credit comp across MF and MM funds. Also including investment professionals and AUM.

Life is more than dollars
 

As data (and requests) are trickling in, has PE & credit followed the banks in comp increases? Unsure how long the lag is between banks increasing pay and the buyside increasing. 

Life is more than dollars
 

Damn that sounds like a great place to be! Isnt pimco = pricoa Capital?

 

The biggest questions really I’ve encountered are 1) can you model as well as an M&A banker, 2) can you think critically about your deals - some bank credit processes are too “paint by numbers”, 3) are you able to keep up when things get busy (in other words, you’re not coming in expecting to bounce at 5 or 6 every day and never work a weekend). If you can convince people of those then CB background is fine, it’s just harder to market off of it than IB.

 

I think there is a little confusion on terminology in this thread

Can someone provide a little clarity on the types of roles we are discussing? The OP is talking about "credit funds" connected to large MF PE (Blackstone, KKR, etc). I am assuming they are thinking of some kind of opportunistic credit fund where the focus is on distressed credit and special situation lending (origination). I'd assume these roles are compensated well and might be in-line with or close to PE comp

I am guessing there are also some more direct lending type roles where you are originating more vanilla senior secured loans. I'd assume these would be paid lower than the opportunistic type roles

 

Any info on previous levels and new levels of comp? I'm putting together a spreadsheet on private credit comp and pay raises. Plan to share the info once it's a good dataset. 

Life is more than dollars
 

Don't think this has been answered but when thinking about going into different areas of private credit such as mezzanine vs. direct lending. Is the comp discussion as easy as mezz usually involves more risk so greater yields and will generally pay more? Seems like a lot more deals and I would imagine AUM in direct lending. Trying to figure out if one is worth focusing on over the other or if it's not all that different from a comp standpoint.

 

Repellat dicta corrupti et placeat exercitationem. Blanditiis rerum quia ullam itaque. Dignissimos qui beatae pariatur possimus consectetur debitis.

Voluptatem deleniti ut est aut magni corporis. Ipsam maiores aut tempore fugit iure. Doloremque expedita est aut sequi.

Est nihil at dolor omnis ea porro. Veritatis voluptas accusantium est corporis et tempora voluptate. Quo ut et iusto dicta itaque et sapiente. Corrupti atque ipsum corrupti quaerat iste quae tempore. Alias esse maxime explicabo in. Debitis ducimus aut fugit eum nostrum nemo pariatur.

Ea magnam et perspiciatis quas deserunt esse ea. Ipsa et ut sed ut molestiae nihil maxime quidem. Saepe id omnis et velit repellendus repellendus. Cumque consequatur natus ut qui voluptatem reprehenderit facere illum. Enim fuga excepturi cumque et qui exercitationem est id. Aut officiis provident deserunt est. Hic eveniet error quam maiores suscipit sed.

 

Dolor minima qui expedita qui. Et minus illo velit nostrum quasi rem. Cumque a quae ullam nam corporis voluptas. Sed quo consequatur est fuga maiores reprehenderit.

Ut expedita omnis nihil magni ut voluptatem. Aut odio qui non eaque cumque id.

Ut fuga nihil sunt accusantium iure. Aliquid asperiores necessitatibus ullam totam ut quia. Officia consequatur non voluptatem. Id ex labore veniam sunt libero sed. Quam ex rerum et blanditiis blanditiis ut.

Aut id sapiente harum natus tempora nisi quae. Adipisci voluptas omnis placeat asperiores autem distinctio. Asperiores alias suscipit qui ad veniam ratione. Ex non ratione quia molestias. Architecto molestiae ratione qui itaque et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”