Just gonna straight up ask, what’s the salary range for analysts at credit funds connected to large “MF” PE firms like KKR or Blackstone. Is it in-line with PE analysts @ the firm? Similar?
Trending Content - Credit Forum
Career Resources
WSO Free Modeling Series - Now Open Through
October 31, 2026
9 Free Financial Modeling Lessons
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
High Finance Applications
Guaranteed
Get at least one offer GUARANTEED
- 1:1 support
- 92% success rate
- 2,000+ mentor network
- Unlimited Live bootcamps
- AI for resume + LinkedIn
- Networking automation tools
- HireVue simulation tool
- Full course library
- Private Slack community
- 20hrs of mocks
- + much more...
Bump. Also interested. Focused on Special Sits / Credit Opportunities / Mezz groups. I'd imagine it could be in line with MM PE or a slight discount to the PE guys?
On par with the buyout people, generally. Discount only really happens as you get more senior and carry is a larger portion of your TC - returns in credit are lower, leading to lower carry.
Almost all credit funds have backleverage so I doubt the returns are all that much lower
To clarify, only all-senior funds (sprinkled with same safe 2L) have back leverage. Very few leverage providers will give an advance rate on anything junior to 2L and even the advance rate given on 2L is 20-40% max, in my experience. Have recently gone through the convos with a handful of them during a fundraise.
You're comparing returns or a credit fund to the likes of buyout or VC? Huh?!
What is meant by “lower carry?” $1M?
How much lower would carry he at the senior level? I’ve also heard that PC usually have a higher AUM/headcount ratio so even though return is lower carry comp shouldn’t be too low on average (obv top performing PE will do better given upside). Is there any truth to that?
Same base, different bonuses, different hours.
How do you think hours compare to PE for special-sits / junior debt investing teams?
If MF PE was 80-100 then MF PC would be around 70-90.
From comparing my cash comp with a friend at MF PE it's actually fairly similar. I hear it diverges when they get carry, but I have much better hours. So there's some puts and takes, I think in PE you max out cash comp probably similar to credit if I had to guess.
Have heard the same on comp (excl. carry) being the same across major strategies at MFs. Credit is a key pillar of many MFs' strategy by now - just look at Blackstone Credit as an example.
The carry component and differential vs equity colleagues is not always trivial to assess. Generally speaking, carry in PE will be higher assuming same fund size / fee earning AUM, given PC has management fee of 1.0-1.5% with 10-15% profit share (depending on fund strategy) vs 2/20 for PE, and assuming PC will yield ~10% while PE will yield ~15% both over 5y investment period.
Differential will decrease once factoring in that there is often fewer investment professionals per $ under management in credit, i.e. VP at MF Credit will possibly get more % of carry vs PE VP.
Others please chime in.
It's not trivial to assess the difference in total $s, but I think its important to understand how long it takes to get carry and how you actually realize it. You get it vested over a 5-7 year fund, often it vests on a straight line, so you need to stay there for at least 4-5 years for it to be worth anything and maybe the fund takes 7-10 to actually payout the realizations from start to finish. All the while, you are working 70-80+ hour work weeks (while the credit guys may be pulling in 50-60) and getting your weekends/life blown up. There's also many strategies within credit that may not have carry like the public side, or at APO credit they are *mostly* public side and do some private side deals, likely not getting carry that means much.
So yeah carry is not insignificant, but its tied heavily to your longevity there and takes a ton of time to be realized. I would bet that the amount of people that fully see the carry out is likely less than you think.
End of day my takeaway is - cash comp very similar, carry higher in PE but comes with harder lifestyle/hours and requires longevity to actually see it realized and receive it.
That’s all spot on.
Only difference I would flag is that PC is way more scalable. Putting $1-2bn to work per year in PE is quite a task vs PC guys parachute in when the deal is already pretty likely to get done and they get diligence materials served to them on a silver platter… so putting $1-2bn of PC to work is like a 4-6 month affair.
I’ll let one of you sketch out the math. But what’s the per year average carry spun off for $1.5bn PE at a 5 year 2.0x MOIC vs. $4bn PC at a 3-4 year 1.3x MOIC?
Im guessing it’s pretty close to parity. Now add to that much better lifestyle in PC but far less interesting and it’s largely a wash. Be that as it may, career-wise PE is still > PC by Wall Street standards. For all intents and purposes PC is servicing PE and are largely getting managed by our cap mkts guys, who no one really respects.
Following. Thanks for creating the thread. Interested in hearing specific numbers at shops.
FWIW, Carlyle Credit probably has lower comp than other MFs.
why is Carlyle credit comp lower? any numbers?
Many have referenced better lifestyle / fewer hours in high-yield credit vs equity, which is interesting to me. Structurally, is there a reason for this? I'd imagine this would be very firm/culture-dependent, no? Unless there's a structural reason that I'm not thinking of.
High yielding fixed is fixed vs looking for working to generate higher returns on equity.
Yeah. PC shops can generate 15% IRRs (2x levered) with 1L security and low portfolio management costs. So long as you avoid binary risk in your deals (ie. taking a donut), you can generate a pretty nice returns and have a better lifestyle. I'm not really interested in working until 1AM anymore...
Currently on the debt side at a debt fund and looking to transition to the equity side (which fits better with my personal style of investing). Generally speaking, are the hours going to be worse? I've heard that due to there being fewer equity deals, equity professionals on average work on fewer deals at any given time, which somewhat counterbalances the more "hands on" nature of equity.
PE is just much more labor and time intensive. Hit rate of deals looked at vs deals done is quite low. Involvement during the investment hold is a substantial part of the job. Networking with management companies is big. Developing and building out investment themes/ideas is hugely time consuming. Diligencing and structuring a deal is quite intensive. The risk profile through the equity means you have to be waaaay more paranoid and rigorous.
How about for the next tier of firms? HPS/Golub/Guggenheim/etc.
Not sure I’d lump in Guggenheim with the other two…..
Am curious about your view. I routinely see the three running in the same deals.
What is market standard for credit shops below MF?
Awesome thread so far. Can anyone who's presently at large PC firms anonymously drop their actual comp figures? Would love to see real data points.
Assoc 0 at MF PC. 140 base + 100-120% bonus. This is for someone who has no experience in PC.
What is Assoc 0? Like you have signed but haven't started yet? Or is this like a Senior Analyst year?
130 + 80-120 1st yr
I mean if you look on the search bar, you’ll see data points for most firms. Think mid 200s all in first year comp is pretty typical for larger private credit funds. At certain firms, comp can stretch first year to something like 300 - 350. Expect at those places to have about a 50k increase in comp yearly through time you hit director / principal level.
What are some of the higher paying firms?
Easy way to tell is take aum, then find the type of yields they go for, and then find out number of ips. Higher the ratio is, higher the pay
If anybody wants to DM me, I am pulling a spreadsheet together for private credit comp across MF and MM funds. Also including investment professionals and AUM.
Thank you! Sbed.
In a classic case of WSO, 10 people have asked me for the spreadsheet and not one person has volunteered data.
If you have sixth street lmk
As data (and requests) are trickling in, has PE & credit followed the banks in comp increases? Unsure how long the lag is between banks increasing pay and the buyside increasing.
Following
HPS I believe is the highest paying credit shop that's not the credit arm of a MF. 300-350k all-in for ASO1.
Any hard numbers?
Look at WSO search feature, couple of recent data points there
$400k cash all-in plus carry. Vested carry will likely net me an additional ~$600k over the next 2-3 years based on exit timing and current valuations. $500MM fund. Not really f u money, but there isn't really anything I want to do that I can't or haven't already.
Thanks for sharing. Without giving too much detail about your fund or background, do you mind sharing what type of profiles you normally see come aboard into the fund? Is it normally candidates from lev fin background or corporate banking ?
IB, mostly M&A.
Amazing numbers for a LMM fund - good for you. How many years of experience do you have?
Less than 15 more than 10.
PIMCO are starting to build up a junior program for their alternative credit team ($33B I believe). Have heard they're hiring interns out of undergrad with a clear path to PM. At a place like PIMCO, AN1 should be ballpark $150k and ASO1 at $250K...
Damn that sounds like a great place to be! Isnt pimco = pricoa Capital?
No.. PIMCO is Pacific Investment Management Company which manages over $2.2T in fixed-income assets.
Fairly sure Ares and Antares VPs are $165-$185 salary with bonus about the same.
Would expect Ares to pay more than Antares.
Most large credit fund VPs make $500k+ and Ares is one of the highest paying credit shops (Antares doesn't really count)
Have a really hard time believing this
Edit: Looks like I am in the wrong and MF Credit shops are paying out the ass!
DELETE
How feasible do you think it would be to jump from corporate banking at a BB to a credit fund like Ares or Antares like shop? Currently 2nd year analyst and think maybe another year or two would be time for a good transition.
Virtually impossible - almost exclusively recruit out of IB roles. LevFin is probably the most common team they pull out of. I’d try to transfer into those groups within your bank then make the jump 1-2 years later
Wouldn’t listen to the other guy at all. Corporate banking is fine as long as you know your stuff. Private credit investing is just building the credit memo for a bank on steroids. If you’re smart / personable and have some deal experience you’ll be fine. Know multiple people from corporate banking who have gone to top credit funds
Both of the other answers have one SB and two MS - what am I supposed to make of this
Not sure why I’d get ms - we literally just onboarded someone today from a tier 2 corporate bank. It’s possible we’re unique in that well look at less traditional backgrounds but still
The biggest questions really I’ve encountered are 1) can you model as well as an M&A banker, 2) can you think critically about your deals - some bank credit processes are too “paint by numbers”, 3) are you able to keep up when things get busy (in other words, you’re not coming in expecting to bounce at 5 or 6 every day and never work a weekend). If you can convince people of those then CB background is fine, it’s just harder to market off of it than IB.
Agree on the second two points, but you don’t need that quality of M&A modeling for private credit. Credit modeling is mostly about downside risk which is easier to build out
Would add its more focused on running diligence processes. In CB, you largely are not diligencing clients nor are you creating diligence request lists, underwriting, etc (at least on relationship side
Do any of these firms have coinvest both within the buyout funds under the same firm or within the credit funds? If so what does it look like?
Yes, that is common at MF Credit
Thanks. How are these programs typically structured? Do you commit to a fixed amount (and what is this capped at?) or is it done on a per deal basis? Participation in credit funds or also PE? Are you charged as an LP or no fees?
I’m at a MF, PE / PC is bulk of AUM with other smaller business lines. We’re able to coinvest in all funds offered by the firm, and can lever the coinvest up to 3x.
Thanks this is very helpful.
I think there is a little confusion on terminology in this thread
Can someone provide a little clarity on the types of roles we are discussing? The OP is talking about "credit funds" connected to large MF PE (Blackstone, KKR, etc). I am assuming they are thinking of some kind of opportunistic credit fund where the focus is on distressed credit and special situation lending (origination). I'd assume these roles are compensated well and might be in-line with or close to PE comp
I am guessing there are also some more direct lending type roles where you are originating more vanilla senior secured loans. I'd assume these would be paid lower than the opportunistic type roles
Does anyone have any hard or anecdotal evidence of the buyside PE & Credit shops increase pay in lockstep with the banks? Would think there would be a matching increase pretty quickly in order to keep kids converting from sellside to buyside.
Golub just raised pay, pretty sure not a coincidence
Any info on previous levels and new levels of comp? I'm putting together a spreadsheet on private credit comp and pay raises. Plan to share the info once it's a good dataset.
Any details on what they raised to? Helpful to bring up with employer
Don't think this has been answered but when thinking about going into different areas of private credit such as mezzanine vs. direct lending. Is the comp discussion as easy as mezz usually involves more risk so greater yields and will generally pay more? Seems like a lot more deals and I would imagine AUM in direct lending. Trying to figure out if one is worth focusing on over the other or if it's not all that different from a comp standpoint.
A lot more will be pushed into carry in mezz because you're using a lot more PIK and equity like components.
To add a data point - just received an offer from the credit arm of a MF. I’m a lateral from a bank but would think I’m going in as an AN1. Base 120K and told me I should expect total comp to be around 160 given the fact that I’m joining in May (bonus to be pro-rated for 7/12 months till bonus season).
Could I pm you to learn more about this?
Yes no worries
Harum eveniet corrupti placeat sunt quibusdam amet eos. Repellat suscipit tempora sit voluptate aut ad facere. Quaerat praesentium aliquam ut distinctio exercitationem consequatur. Quae eum sit quae. Ipsum non qui labore sit quibusdam. Dignissimos qui et mollitia omnis.
Corrupti doloribus quaerat soluta repellendus voluptas sapiente. Labore totam facilis iusto autem facere eum. Consequatur consequatur ipsam temporibus placeat enim quasi consequatur. Recusandae et eveniet dolorem et rerum unde. Quo perspiciatis quas molestiae totam.
Adipisci ipsam est veritatis quas esse dignissimos labore. Vel molestias sint quo quis fugiat illo non. Non rem minus unde doloribus autem dignissimos eum. Velit quia dolor qui sed impedit doloribus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Ratione perspiciatis omnis qui ea. Suscipit et incidunt quia nihil reiciendis quaerat. Exercitationem doloribus laborum eum laudantium. Sint dolores libero corporis perferendis et voluptatem et. Et vero ullam qui debitis et nulla blanditiis et. Voluptatem repellendus et commodi non quis. Dignissimos aut ab dolorum dignissimos illo.
Minus ut ea beatae consequuntur provident aut ullam. Omnis iusto aliquid corporis placeat neque architecto sed. Perferendis expedita nobis magnam qui ratione et.
Enim delectus ut sunt sequi et. Dolor expedita est voluptatem in est. Pariatur error eaque illum. Iusto perspiciatis voluptatum praesentium labore nihil. A reprehenderit nemo vitae ea cum veniam et. Nam itaque consequuntur quibusdam est accusamus sit similique.
Odio veniam et sunt est dolores consectetur est facere. Dolor temporibus qui aliquam aliquid sunt eligendi quia. Quaerat a non temporibus repellendus ut ea ut. Beatae quisquam rerum laboriosam asperiores. Quas illum iste voluptate vel aut.
Inventore nam non nihil excepturi molestiae adipisci dolore distinctio. Dolorem quisquam quis est atque iusto. In dolore officia distinctio ducimus debitis.
Quia placeat minus consequatur aut. Ut expedita occaecati quo voluptatibus ut. Consectetur quibusdam nostrum natus perferendis molestiae et. Et illum adipisci explicabo et corrupti quisquam nobis. Nulla reiciendis aut ut a dolor soluta. Doloribus veniam qui ad distinctio et iusto vel. Aperiam laudantium necessitatibus delectus sunt.
Voluptas doloribus magni alias rerum cumque sed repellat numquam. Et eaque beatae error quia minus eum totam odit.
Et quia inventore fugiat quia. Consequatur possimus earum aut porro dicta officia maiores. Tempore voluptas recusandae iste culpa ut.
Itaque ea alias ad qui nam odit molestiae sit. Ea aut sequi maiores explicabo enim quasi. Ut illo qui quaerat quam at provident natus optio.
Qui laboriosam sit ab. Incidunt cumque exercitationem molestias autem vero error tempora.