Most Helpful

In a nutshell, we use a ton of growth rate/margin assumptions that are either given to us by the management team of the client, are noted somewhere in their financial statements, or are present in consensus research reports. If all of that fails, we might just assume consistent growth rate of sales (for example) based on their past few years of financials.

The more three statement models you build, the more you’re able see industry trends as well as know which line items correlate to which (ex: if it’s a quick model, you might forecast depreciation as a fixed percentage of capex - otherwise you would build a full depreciation schedule).

As a student it seems quite confusing but once you’ve built a few on the job it becomes incredibly intuitive.

 

Theres some good threads on pitching stocks on WSO. Pitch the stock, not the company. Keep it short 2-3 min, and catalyst specific. What is moving the stock, what are investors looking for, why are we buying/selling now?

As for the forecast itself, I would listen to the most recent investor call/presentation (sometimes mgmt teams give explicit margin/growth guidance). You can get a feel for how the statements generally move through looking at historicals. Also depends on what company you are looking at, and how their revenues are driven (Very different forecasting method for something like a bank/REIT, vs SaaS, etc). I wouldn’t be afraid of looking at sell-side estimates to see if you are in the ballpark either, most sell-siders don’t stray too far from the flock. But yes to SEC filings and Bloomberg. CapitalIQ and FactSet are also awesome if you have access.

 

This is the whole job of modeling, in a way. It's not that hard to build a model that works mechanically, and it's very hard to choose a good number for revenue growth and cost growth or margin assumptions. And the DCF capitalizes growth rates, so small changes in assumptions lead to big changes in warranted value. (If you don't already, you should put a little sensitivity table off to the side of your DCF showing warranted value to 1% and 2% changes to WACC and terminal growth rates. If your forecast calls for above-consensus growth and that's the only way there is any stock upside, you have to be very confident your forecast is right.)

On my team, we take each key revenue line and we break it into unusual items (e.g., normally Olympics advertising revenue comes in even years when the games are played) and the main big core piece (= total minus unusuals). Then we decompose the big core piece into price and volume and forecast each. Often you can find volumes from an industry source, like John Peddie research for PC shipments.

Where a firm offers multiple products, it's important to think about different demand functions for each instead of jamming in the same revenue growth estimates for disparate products - hatchbacks will grow slower than pickups in an expansion and be more resilient in a recession. Honda does more hatchbacks and way less pickups than the industry, and its growth forecasts should reflect that.

It also helps to compare to total industry numbers - if you think grocery stores as an industry are going to do -2%, you can have a view on whether the market leader Kroger might be slightly above or below that, or a smaller specialist like Sprouts well above or below. It's hard to build a total industry view as a student preparing a stock pitch, but that's a key part of what we actually do day to day. It also forces some discipline on your models - if you add up all your company forecasts and get to above-GDP growth, do you have a story for why your sector is taking share of total household spending away from rent, utilities, and other discretionary spending? If not, it's time to reduce your estimates...

And can it ever be?
 

Nesciunt est veritatis reprehenderit. Esse error ratione qui. Et est quo rerum veritatis autem dolores saepe. Quidem inventore aut voluptas. Sed cumque odit eligendi eum ut amet. Id nam placeat doloribus architecto deleniti voluptate quae aut. Optio nihil praesentium in.

Quia deleniti corrupti nemo aspernatur non iure voluptatem. Nihil ratione cum est quis. At quia officia accusantium omnis velit commodi quia. Quasi rerum magni eius delectus nostrum. Quibusdam eum aut magni debitis est. Sit doloribus recusandae sequi dolorum qui amet nihil.

Libero doloribus consectetur sit modi. Est itaque ducimus repudiandae. Sit dolor magni possimus unde quia quos.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”