10 Comments
 
Most Helpful

In a nutshell, we use a ton of growth rate/margin assumptions that are either given to us by the management team of the client, are noted somewhere in their financial statements, or are present in consensus research reports. If all of that fails, we might just assume consistent growth rate of sales (for example) based on their past few years of financials.

The more three statement models you build, the more you’re able see industry trends as well as know which line items correlate to which (ex: if it’s a quick model, you might forecast depreciation as a fixed percentage of capex - otherwise you would build a full depreciation schedule).

As a student it seems quite confusing but once you’ve built a few on the job it becomes incredibly intuitive.

 

Theres some good threads on pitching stocks on WSO. Pitch the stock, not the company. Keep it short 2-3 min, and catalyst specific. What is moving the stock, what are investors looking for, why are we buying/selling now?

As for the forecast itself, I would listen to the most recent investor call/presentation (sometimes mgmt teams give explicit margin/growth guidance). You can get a feel for how the statements generally move through looking at historicals. Also depends on what company you are looking at, and how their revenues are driven (Very different forecasting method for something like a bank/REIT, vs SaaS, etc). I wouldn’t be afraid of looking at sell-side estimates to see if you are in the ballpark either, most sell-siders don’t stray too far from the flock. But yes to SEC filings and Bloomberg. CapitalIQ and FactSet are also awesome if you have access.

 

Hi OP, they lick their finger and put it in the air to see where the wind blows. Or they just use the assumptions provided from management and goal seek that way. 

 

This is the whole job of modeling, in a way. It's not that hard to build a model that works mechanically, and it's very hard to choose a good number for revenue growth and cost growth or margin assumptions. And the DCF capitalizes growth rates, so small changes in assumptions lead to big changes in warranted value. (If you don't already, you should put a little sensitivity table off to the side of your DCF showing warranted value to 1% and 2% changes to WACC and terminal growth rates. If your forecast calls for above-consensus growth and that's the only way there is any stock upside, you have to be very confident your forecast is right.)

On my team, we take each key revenue line and we break it into unusual items (e.g., normally Olympics advertising revenue comes in even years when the games are played) and the main big core piece (= total minus unusuals). Then we decompose the big core piece into price and volume and forecast each. Often you can find volumes from an industry source, like John Peddie research for PC shipments.

Where a firm offers multiple products, it's important to think about different demand functions for each instead of jamming in the same revenue growth estimates for disparate products - hatchbacks will grow slower than pickups in an expansion and be more resilient in a recession. Honda does more hatchbacks and way less pickups than the industry, and its growth forecasts should reflect that.

It also helps to compare to total industry numbers - if you think grocery stores as an industry are going to do -2%, you can have a view on whether the market leader Kroger might be slightly above or below that, or a smaller specialist like Sprouts well above or below. It's hard to build a total industry view as a student preparing a stock pitch, but that's a key part of what we actually do day to day. It also forces some discipline on your models - if you add up all your company forecasts and get to above-GDP growth, do you have a story for why your sector is taking share of total household spending away from rent, utilities, and other discretionary spending? If not, it's time to reduce your estimates...

And can it ever be?
 

Aspernatur dolorem voluptatem id dignissimos nulla dolores laboriosam. Totam qui iste non itaque. Nobis autem sunt earum pariatur voluptas iure. Expedita repudiandae sit culpa similique repellendus. Quis sed vel iure facilis.

Et totam ipsa recusandae eum voluptatem aspernatur sit sequi. Non minus deleniti odit doloribus iure nihil omnis.

Temporibus consequatur recusandae qui officiis ut. Rem ab architecto voluptatem dolores ut. Ad quaerat quasi dicta exercitationem. Corporis neque facilis sed voluptatem alias debitis. Odit atque voluptatem voluptas minus. Ut reiciendis quo possimus ducimus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”