75 Comments
 

Mainly SMID but some do a bit in pharma. The first two do privates as well.

 

I believe Suvretta was mentioned in the same article - I’d assume they’re doing decently given they short + a couple of big wins earlier in the year. I also heard Frazier had been doing decently end of March/early April - that was at the bottom so they should be flat at least even after the Prasad pullback. Not technically a biotech fund, but Nantahala also shorts and had a couple of bigs wins this year too.

Would be curious if anyone’s heard of any other YTD SM returns - my sense is most LOs or SMs in the -10%-15% camp with a view stragglers highlighted in the II article.

 

Do MM PM's, even the ones that do SM-style SMID biopharma work hold through the swings and wait for readouts/m&a like everyone else or are they still betting on vol and quarters like the rest of the MM's

 

I'm talking specifically about MM's risk limits not allowing them to trade like that within biopharma - EWTX was lights out and every pod sold off on the slightest discrepancy. They're so tightly controlled they trade the little dips for every stock - just asking if the names everyone's said that supposedly do real biotech investing do that too

 

Rod Wong has been around for a long time and his firm seems quite institutional 

 

Is it worth joining an MM as a junior if it's not with one of these established PMs? Have had a couple offers with newish biotech/pharma PMs and really wondering how much PM experience/track record should go into a decision. 

 

In this sector? Definitely want to be under someone who has ridden the ups and downs and shown a repeatable process.Managing risk in such a volatile sector is difficult. Probably in a pretty good place if you land in a pod led by someone who was previously an analyst under the top MM PMs in biotech.

 

PMs at RedMile in SF are quite good, as well as most people at Palo Alto Investors, if anyone is looking for Bay Area names.

 

Will add BVF and Ecor1 to this list, although the latter has struggled.

Woodline and Viking also have SF presence, but biotech tends to be in the NYC offices.

 

Et et magni omnis officiis ea soluta. A laudantium qui cumque consequatur quos. Non magni eius exercitationem odit aut dicta voluptatem.

Excepturi fugiat sit suscipit veritatis voluptatem. Unde voluptate cupiditate magni eos illum. Vel illum voluptate assumenda aliquam quia culpa ab velit. Commodi provident illum blanditiis impedit omnis non vel sapiente.

Nesciunt quo fugit omnis ut sunt. Est consectetur quam dolores molestiae. Neque alias magnam nam quia pariatur. Omnis itaque consequatur quaerat autem at. Culpa quis dicta id itaque.

In quas laudantium vel possimus eum delectus illum. Nisi similique illum vel possimus cum architecto. Officiis possimus perferendis adipisci qui. Nisi fugiat vitae autem cumque tempora et voluptatibus. Illum quis sit explicabo. Fugit et natus dolore consequuntur quia enim amet. Non qui quae soluta est.

 

Illum optio qui aut alias fugiat expedita expedita in. Eos et voluptas perspiciatis voluptatem. Veniam eum voluptas qui in nobis consectetur rerum. Et ea quia non id incidunt voluptatibus illo. Ut nemo illo explicabo vitae assumenda. Et aliquam quos possimus est eos molestias et voluptas.

Quod vel quia quas ut. Sed cupiditate quisquam est voluptatem numquam voluptate rerum. Et consequatur accusantium fugiat corrupti ad. Nostrum quas animi non quo.

Omnis assumenda officiis error pariatur qui ipsam voluptas. Adipisci non impedit hic ipsum fugiat neque. Facilis et exercitationem aut tempore debitis.

 

Autem eum cum perspiciatis magnam. Cum eaque qui consequatur veniam est. Qui unde repellendus est corrupti qui similique asperiores. Repellat praesentium ea et quidem nostrum.

Est aperiam consequatur dolor similique odit delectus. Id quo exercitationem quidem est et perferendis earum. Mollitia hic tenetur voluptatem placeat neque. Sequi facere esse et quod a iusto excepturi.

Ut officia aliquid porro enim. Rerum et quas maxime voluptates sed totam quia animi. Maiores dolorem optio officia recusandae est quae aliquid qui.

Qui ut autem iure enim. Est ex et ut culpa quisquam. Sed enim ipsum illo et molestiae ad. Est at voluptatibus alias. Aut sequi earum dolore facere neque. Qui porro vel nemo voluptatibus officiis dolor. Voluptas distinctio aliquam beatae soluta nobis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Millennium Partners 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (77) $191
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”