Can someone please provide an opinion on Tiger Global now?

With the head of PE stepping down and them raising only 2.2bn out of 6bn raise, has Tiger Global lost its appeal as an option of MFPE associates? I understand that this gets asked all of the time but it would be great if someone can kindly share some insight into them. The founder has obviously already made his money so im wondering if this place is still a solid outcome for the top 1% of PE associates. Appears that the universe of attractive SM seats to leave your cushy PE gig for is shrinking.

 

Yeah more cause they’re not hiring not cause people aren’t qualified.

 

The quality of their work and lone pine’s is just atrocious. If you want insight into lone process and quality of work, just take a look at what their semis analyst pitched live the other day

If even capable of getting offers there, I don’t see any plausible reason why you’d ever want to work at either of them. What are you even optimizing for if you choose to work there? It’s not pay (otherwise work for podshop), not process/development (I don’t need to elaborate there), for what? Key card at solow??

If you’re really dead set on working for single manager funds, you’re not looking in the right place / AUM zip code…there’s your hint.

 

Second this. Those notes/pictures some spec sales guy leaked from Sohn conference — the lone pine pitch looked like something a college freshman put together. I’ve lost all respect for that fund - by far the worst pitch I’ve seen in my 9 years on the buyside. Really surprising

And re: Tiger. I agree on the public side, talent is lacking / they’ve lost key people (Griff at the helm isn’t doing shit…), and process / style is similarly shitty to lone pine. On a brighter note, I actually think the privates strategy of speed vs quality is somewhat unique, although the effectiveness is clearly waning per fundraising miss

TLDR: second the above, not quite sure about the appeal of working there. The pay is not appealing to me

 
Most Helpful

It’s great you feel that way, but doesn’t change the fact that:

- their analysts have no idea what they’re doing and are completely oblivious to what real process / fundamental work is. These are the guys who get excited about 2029 AI stories and blow up on prints

- they need multiple years of +20% to get back to HWM. Even if Chase doesn’t turn it into a FO by then, the pay I’ve heard is nowhere near where people here write

- you’ve just admitted their strategy of 50 net (with mediocre shorts so really closer to 75-100 net) + long ARKK only works when rates are low, which is exactly the case. Why someone pays 1 and 15 for that I couldn’t tell you. My guess is that changes in the next few years. I’m not sure how much external AUM they have in the HF, but do keep in mind majority of it is chase’s which obviously is fee-free.

It’s delicate decision because it’s your career, so you really need to have conviction in the fund / pick the right horse…too many smoking guns here / doesn’t make any sense imo. I’ve met several folks there over the years. All the impressive ones have left. If you want to be a PM one day and build a track record, I’d say working there is counterproductive

 

I mean you would go to one of these funds since you are still comped extremely well and can be paid to underperform for quite a while without getting canned. Same reason why I joined PE

 
Funniest

Can somebody get LowCaliberTalent’s hands on this pitch. Could this revise Lone Pine’s place in “The Tears of Mount Olympus” Tier

 

Can someone share the Lone Pine pitch? Thanks, really curious.

 

Another issue is that some analysts might just start their own fund with new start, leaving behind the disastrous TGM returns and bring some talent from TGM with them. Morale might not be the highest rn further incentivizing departures. Idk how strong TGM non-competes are. 

 

Idio Viking problems

- The analysts are insecure and incompetent — they force themselves to have obscure variant views that 99% of the time are simply consensus views or just completely incorrect views. This is the biggest problem and the analysts have horrible habits / consistently pitch me terrible ideas

- The PMs are analysts that were trained with the above mindset / style

- CIO is incredibly difficult to work for and not a fair person at all. Was a different shop under Sundheim.

- The comp is subpar at analyst / senior analyst level

Not sure I’d work at a fund like this

 

I am at a large SM (multistrat, great AUM/IP ratio, small team) but am looking to jump and have been looking at various shops including theirs. If my biggest issues with my current shop are (a) my CIO is incredibly difficult to work for / uncollaborative / sporadically demanding for no good reason, (b) junior comp is poor vs MF PE , (c) path upwards is questionable (political, could be slow, need lucky timing with space in the GP opening up) -- am I looking at the wrong shop? I thought they would solve at least B and C for me, and assumed if I liked the sector head I could solve for A

 

Nothing to see here folks. Just another thread of SM analysts shitting on pods and vice versa. 

 

Numquam soluta a voluptatum molestiae similique mollitia. Neque voluptas voluptas nobis dolor dicta velit non. Quod aut omnis eum perferendis sed eos. Aliquam est provident quo repellat voluptatibus.

Nostrum at explicabo ipsum. Consequatur et itaque consequatur voluptatum molestiae dolorem. Sint odio pariatur omnis sit velit illo repellat.

 

Alias et aspernatur sed atque beatae non. Ut modi a sed delectus commodi est odit. Quaerat soluta velit rerum. Rerum quos ipsa doloremque ut et.

Fuga iusto accusamus iste voluptas quae. Veritatis fugit et ut est iusto. Non ab voluptatibus deserunt in odio sit. Eaque ex asperiores consequatur aspernatur aut.

Quisquam rerum sunt ipsa voluptatum. Non numquam fugiat sint. Modi dolorem libero qui consequuntur ex. Non sequi magnam laboriosam non quis facilis. Doloribus nihil mollitia sapiente et quis perspiciatis porro. Aliquid similique molestiae eligendi. Consequuntur voluptatem id magnam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”