Model Test - P72 vs Citadel

To those of you have taken both, which one do you think was harder? 

I took the Citadel one recently and have a Point72 model test (+ Wonderlic) coming up. I was not a fan of the Citadel model test being browser-based with such limited functionality. Does one test focus more on the a cash flow build, debt build, or PP&E, etc? 

I can always pm you if you have intel on P72 and need intel on Citadel's test.

33 Comments
 

With these tests, really focus on the revenue builds and how these assumptions filter down the statements. No one cares about your PP&E schedule if we're paying you to get the right EPS number.

P72 was an incomplete model that you had to fix up and calculate specific ratios.

 
Most Helpful

hardcode your goodwill and that fixes that! (JK... sorta) 

I would get ROIC right though... I have never taken these but my impression from reading previous threads is that "income statement +" models are somewhat fine, where you may have the balance sheet drivers feeding through to a very basic BS (DIO, DSO, etc.), but run out of time on reconciling CF statement, and maybe just do some basic CF metrics as a bonus. The point seems to be that you should arrive at a place where you can talk about the range of earnings outcomes over the next few quarters (and your valuation ranges as a result) so that you can discuss the set up on the stock somewhat intelligently (ie: what key drivers and/or unit economics do we need to underwrite to make money here, why would this risk/reward be attractive or not) 

 

I doing my Citadel online modelling test tomorrorw, PM me if you can for help and tips! I have done the P72 modelling test if anyone needs help with that 

 

Quia perspiciatis delectus repellat cum et vitae nihil nihil. Commodi qui maxime velit vero molestiae porro laudantium numquam. Sed fugiat at ducimus non.

Nostrum qui libero ipsam quasi sed. Laudantium officiis dolorum rem soluta voluptatibus. Vitae sit suscipit aut deserunt exercitationem ut iusto. Ex omnis consequatur sunt nam assumenda amet sed. Voluptate omnis libero repellat quo qui eum. Animi aut ullam dignissimos dolores qui rerum quae. Veritatis tempora sed laboriosam rerum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Millennium Partners 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (77) $191
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”