Where to Start When Analyzing Multinational Stocks

Hi all,

I hope this isn't a complete noob question, but I'm trying to learn more about fundamental analysis and I think what I'm realizing is that I have trouble figuring out what to focus on when analyzing stocks. This is particularly bad when I try to analyze large, multinational companies, but it's not easy even when I analyze small caps because there's a lot of different things to look at, and it can become confusing as to what to focus on the most.

Therefore, I was wondering if anyone has tips as to process (i.e. first I analyze the industry, then I do X, etc.) they use when analyzing securities because I think a big problem is that I have no structure and keep aimlessly jumping from one thing to another getting nowhere. If there is also good literature, I'd be interested in that as well.

Thanks and sorry again for a asking a potentially fairly straightforward question.

EDIT: I realize after re-reading my post that this sounds kind of vague. I guess what I'm really asking is what my starting point should be because I look at too many things at once and just end up confusing myself. I have a really hard time getting started and I believe that's really what I'm seeking advice on.

 
Best Response

Once you get to know a business or industry well, you'll develop your own opinion about what's most important. But if you're not sure, a good place to start would be to find out what other people are focused on. Read a few sell-side reports, transcripts, and company presentations and you should get a sense of what metrics people care about and what management wants people to think are the value drivers in the business. Understand that and you can start to see how your perspective might differ from everyone else's.

For a large conglomerate, it helps to think about the business in segments. Try to understand how they fit together, especially through the cycle, but you want to focus on the real sources of value in the company. Where are most of the profits being generated, where is there asset value, where are there major liabilities, where are there opportunities for change? Just starting with reportable segments, you might want to at least start with the largest sources of revenue or earnings.

If you're asking more generally how to start thinking about valuing a company or analyzing financial statements, any good textbook on fundamental analysis will do.

 
tempaccount:
Once you get to know a business or industry well, you'll develop your own opinion about what's most important. But if you're not sure, a good place to start would be to find out what other people are focused on. Read a few sell-side reports, transcripts, and company presentations and you should get a sense of what metrics people care about and what management wants people to think are the value drivers in the business. Understand that and you can start to see how your perspective might differ from everyone else's.

For a large conglomerate, it helps to think about the business in segments. Try to understand how they fit together, especially through the cycle, but you want to focus on the real sources of value in the company. Where are most of the profits being generated, where is there asset value, where are there major liabilities, where are there opportunities for change? Just starting with reportable segments, you might want to at least start with the largest sources of revenue or earnings.

If you're asking more generally how to start thinking about valuing a company or analyzing financial statements, any good textbook on fundamental analysis will do.

Sorry for the late response. I was actually trying to take your advice and reading through some old threads about what other people tend to look at. Based on some research, it seems as though EV/EBITDA, ROIC, EVA and FCF/EV are the most common metrics that are used and that few people try to run DCFs to select equities. I guess my question is, given that most of these seem to be multiples (except ROIC and Econ Value Added), how does one go about then deciding when to purchase a security based on that multiple?

Obviously one way to do is, for example, by saying that, "Company X has a calculated EV/EBITDA multiple of 12 and has previously traded at multiples of 15, so therefore this stock is a buy", but that seems like a weak thesis IMO because something must have happened in investors' minds in order for the stock to drop and it would require a more thorough analysis as to figure out why it's trading at the multiple it is and what catalysts it would have that could lead to multiple expansion. I don't have much experience in investing yet, but from what I've seen, markets generally don't prescribe low PEs without a decent reason, even though it may be flawed.

My guess is that analysts probably estimate future EV, EBITDA, FCF, etc. and then use this future multiple to estimate the true value of the asset. I was wondering, however, if there was good literature about understanding multiples, when they expand/contract and also on how to estimate future cash flows more accurately. I think my main issue is that I'm not always sure how to estimate certain line items and that's where I get stuck when calculating future EBITDA, EPS, etc. I generally understand how to calculate revenue because it makes sense to me, but estimating current assets, projecting AP, etc. (for NWC calculations) and more obscure items like that becomes tricky and I'm not really sure how to go about doing it.

The other thing was if there is a good book/online resource for learning about ROIC. When I tried to read McKinsey Valuation back my sophomore year of school, all I got out of it was that if ROIC > cost of capital, then the company is creating value, but the book was too technical at that time and I dropped it. Maybe I should try again now that I've had some (limited) experience with valuation, but is there any other source I could check out as well?

Thanks again!

 

Aut quasi corrupti repudiandae quis. Fugit nam rerum et autem nostrum.

Doloribus corporis et delectus id sequi quibusdam repudiandae. Et repellat natus dolor doloribus odit. Odit ipsa dolore quisquam. Accusamus esse aut aliquid quia ut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”