Cubs yes, but does he seed those cubs like Julian did, or show any interest in doing so, or foster a strong mentorship relationship like Julian did? Incredibly high turnover across all the pod shops also necessitates many cubs by nature

 
Most Helpful

I can't remember the book that talked about it, but I think it summed up the whole hype about Julian Robertson and the tiger cubs pretty well. It references buffett and the whole thing about flipping a coin "x" number of times; basically raises the question of whether or not hedge funds actually produce strong risk adjusted returns / can outperform the market. The idea being that on average they do not, but if you have enough funds, probabilistically there are going to be those who outperform over a 10/20/30 year time period, and that naturally those funds will also attract the majority of capital, making them look like they know what they are doing. 

But then there is an outlier, because Julian Roberston not only outperformed for a period of time, but those that worked with him and ventured out on their own also outperformed (for a period of time). Which raises the question, why did so many of the people who worked with him / were mentored in his style tend to outperform if it is all just random. Hence the original tiger cub hype was born. We got a second new wave more recently as well. 

If I had to guess, there is also some mix between 1) markets being conducive to his philosophy over those time periods (not only referencing the 2017-2021 hype period) and  2) enough seed money or AUM in general allows you to pay for talent and the resources necessary to run a firm that can find alpha and 3) the process was conducive to producing outsized returns.

I would agree that Ken Griffin is probably the closest to that. Idk if he seeded these PMs that have spun out and "mentored" them, but it is clear that they are replicating the business model. Also Idk if Ken is even that great of an investor himself, rather he understood the process and business structure that would succeed

 

Great write up though Ken Griffin is too selfish to really fit the mold. I wonder if there are better examples of leaders or firms... 

 

The impressive thing about Robertson is that the cubs all have very different styles but still succeeded - you had commodities (slate path/osprarie), large cap L/S (Viking), tech (tiger, coatue), healthcare (Bridger), many funds of various durations approaches and types. D1/Tiger was only a small subset of the tiger community and the different cubs are extremely different from one another

 

Beg to differ. There are some exceptions, but 80% of Tigers are well known for being growthy vehicles that perform with momentum, as seen in the last 3 years. Many of them have super high overlap in their public positions. China, internet, China internet.. very predictable.

Viking is definitely the most visible exception.

 

I can't remember the book that talked about it, but I think it summed up the whole hype about Julian Robertson

Any chance it's More Money than God? He made a case for Julian's alpha, in the appendix, by begging the question of the Tiger Cubs' success. Also referenced the famous Buffett essay 'Superinvestors of Graham and Doddsville'

 

Is it rare for top performing PM’s at MM’s to go start their own shop??

Seems like the hype around SM’s is that many top guys set up their own fund…

Newbie in the space so that may be a poor question to ask.

 

Alex Denner. Healthcare legend. Former Icahn healthcare analyst, now running his own shop. Think he has a doctorate in biomedical sciences or smtg

 

Error delectus autem et tempora debitis enim architecto. Ea maxime maiores et ab. Ducimus omnis rerum consequatur fugiat modi. Quis iure nobis ex incidunt eos nisi et. Ratione suscipit aut voluptate mollitia. Rerum odio deserunt corrupti quaerat.

Ut harum rerum in. Temporibus quia dolorem rerum rerum et aut debitis.

Molestias et corporis maxime. Praesentium vero enim aliquid ea harum odio rem tenetur. Ipsam esse nam mollitia nihil dolorem quidem reprehenderit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 96.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (249) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”