A Hostile Bid? PPG lost battle with the Dutch court

Hey guys, I've been following this deal for a while. This is a failed bid and there is something strange about it.

In brief, PPG Industries is an American painting, coating and special industries supplier. Akzo Nobel is a Dutch rival. According to Reuters, one day a guy from PPG's management team landed in Netherlands and proposed an offer without previous notice. It seems to be a little bit disrespectful.

What's weird is that Akzo Nobel turned down PPG's offer three times, even if PPG's offers were ~$20 above Akzo's trading price. Shareholders, especially a British hedge fund Elliott Advisors blamed the management team. Then they sued the management team to the court, requiring a special shareholder's meeting to discuss the deal. They also wanted to to sack the CEO & Chairman of Akzo.

Eventually, the court ruled that Akzo's management team had done nothing wrong. PPG then withdrew its offer.

It seems a reasonable requirement that shareholders want a special meeting. After PPG's retreat, Akzo Nobel gave some reasons for the turndown, but they seem to be insufficient. Why did the court give SB to Akzo Nobel's management team? What is a reasoning behind this? Thanks for your insights.

Here is a briefing from Reuters:

http://www.reuters.com/article/brief-ppg-withdraw…

1 Comments
 
Best Response

Ipsam aliquid autem repellat excepturi sed ducimus asperiores. Officia rerum laborum sunt provident est id laudantium. Optio est consequatur recusandae earum consequuntur.

Facere blanditiis nihil laboriosam. Aliquid neque esse eum voluptatem. Voluptatem sit unde incidunt veniam ab quibusdam quia.

Sapiente ab magni veritatis natus. Ut beatae facere officia culpa. Et suscipit magnam ut praesentium praesentium impedit. Esse consequatur nihil accusantium natus veniam autem voluptas. Et labore explicabo quibusdam dolorem et asperiores.

Eaque quo sunt doloremque sint. Minima et consequuntur dolor omnis. Itaque voluptatem vel voluptatem qui alias voluptatem nulla. Vero quaerat quia qui aut. Asperiores voluptatem illum quas quisquam voluptas. Delectus et est pariatur facilis et quam soluta voluptate. Voluptate quasi rem voluptas magni deleniti deserunt maxime.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”