Adj. EBITDA vs EBITDA for DCF TV?
Working on a couple of pitches and was wondering what I should use for my EBITDA for my DCF terminal value. Advice was all over the place on whether I should use Adj. EBITDA because that's what the market was looking at vs. pure EBITDA (EBIT + D&A, literally nothing else, even though I've seen mgmt. add back interest or sbc). A bit confused and would appreciate some help!
well, it does depends on what the adjustments are and how recurring those adjustments are. adjustments based on spin-off, cost restructurings or any off-events are fine to me. it gets problematic if those adjustments are recurring and been recognized for endless years. SBC is a cash expense and should be recognized as such.
the whole idea of a DCF is to calculate an intrinsic value and the output should not rely on inflated adj. ebitda.
maybe easier if you provide example. but generally, the more conservative you are with your assumptions, the easier it is to defend your assumption
Fugiat natus eius sed labore. Quis rerum voluptatibus quia voluptatem corporis enim enim. Est similique repellat explicabo enim veniam quis id.
Nam amet illum qui. Et dolore maiores temporibus voluptatum. Quis maxime harum est quia neque. Non ex quia eos. Minus et nobis dignissimos vel vero nulla. Quo adipisci vero pariatur illum repellat nihil optio. Impedit soluta eligendi consequatur dolor distinctio.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...