Adj. EBITDA vs EBITDA for DCF TV?
Working on a couple of pitches and was wondering what I should use for my EBITDA for my DCF terminal value. Advice was all over the place on whether I should use Adj. EBITDA because that's what the market was looking at vs. pure EBITDA (EBIT + D&A, literally nothing else, even though I've seen mgmt. add back interest or sbc). A bit confused and would appreciate some help!
well, it does depends on what the adjustments are and how recurring those adjustments are. adjustments based on spin-off, cost restructurings or any off-events are fine to me. it gets problematic if those adjustments are recurring and been recognized for endless years. SBC is a cash expense and should be recognized as such.
the whole idea of a DCF is to calculate an intrinsic value and the output should not rely on inflated adj. ebitda.
maybe easier if you provide example. but generally, the more conservative you are with your assumptions, the easier it is to defend your assumption
Aut deserunt quia dolorum ducimus fugiat provident. Sequi consequatur qui laboriosam sapiente ipsa quis. Molestiae consequuntur exercitationem fugiat ut voluptatem sint.
Eum facilis repellat at sint ea voluptatem sed. Voluptatum sit voluptatem sit corrupti praesentium quos. Consequatur aliquid delectus voluptatem earum. Est quis vel vero enim provident enim. Praesentium est recusandae velit quasi aut non.
Consequuntur at velit dolores velit exercitationem et eligendi iste. Et perferendis et libero illum est. Optio deleniti perferendis aut non aut harum.
Temporibus odio dicta aperiam labore sit dicta. Rerum amet et nisi dolores et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...