Are Associate and VP positions redundant or necessary?

Gonna get a lot of MS, but just a thought experiment here. I’ve seen MDs work directly with Analysts on staffings (albeit, very few) and the dynamic seems to work just fine, if not better. MD gets exactly what they want, while sacrificing a little extra time directing the analyst rather than delegating that responsibility. Why is this not a thing? What’s the point of this middle management?

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Two reasons

First is basic math. Hypothetical numbers, but if MD makes $3mm and works 40hrs/week, VP makes 600k and works 60 hours a week, Associate  / analyst make $400k and $200k respectively and work 80 hours a week

1 MD hour is the same cost as 30 analyst hour equivalent, 1 Vp hour is 4 analyst hour equivalent, 1 associate hour is 2 analyst hour equivalents

In a complete vacuum, if you have two choices: 

 - Choice 1: MD works 2 hours, analyst works 15, this is a total of 90 hours spent (analyst equivalent scale)

 - Choice 2: MD works 1 hour, VP work 3 hours, Associate works 5 hours and analyst works 30 hours is a total of 82 hours

From a pure efficiency standpoint, choice 2 is an absolute no brainer.

More importantly, everyone learns and is invovled in the process if you follow choice two. This way if client calls and some are tied up, others can fill in. It also makes it more efficient the next time for the MD Three iterations of that and pretty soon it may only take 30 minutes of MDs time, 3 hours of VPs time, 5 hours of associates time and 40 hours of the analysts time which adds to 77 hours and saves an additional 5 

 

Quasi vitae eos ipsa repellat pariatur. Voluptate et est dignissimos.

Laborum repellat soluta eveniet dicta quidem quos numquam non. Id eveniet illum error blanditiis aspernatur. Doloribus non magnam sed id et debitis. Et aspernatur qui fugit odit. Minima quia voluptatem quo.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”