Asset write down/up -- DTA and DTL

These are the explanations for DTA/DTL creation from asset write-up/down. Is the explanation for asset write-down & DTA correct?

  • Asset write-up, which increases depreciation/ decreases pre-tax income on the IS (save on taxes), will produce a DTL.
  • Asset write-down, which increases pre-tax income on the IS (pay more taxes), will produce a DTA

For an asset write down, wouldn't pretax income decrease?

3 Comments
 

Maybe I don't fully understand the question but after a business combination you fair value your assets/liabilities. After that process is complete if you effectively "wrote down" your inventory (for example) as the fair value was less than book cost, then you would inherently recognize less cost when you sell that inventory in the future, thus increasing margin > net income.

Similar to PPE, if you wrote down the value of PPE (fair value book cost) due to a business combination the cost basis of the asset decreases and thus deprecation decreases and income increases.

The reason a DTA may be created in this situation is because your book cost was reduced but for tax purposes the tax basis may have stayed at the original cost pre acquisition which would result in higher future taxable deductions.

 
Most Helpful

I went over the subject a few days ago, and I'm not 100% confident, but this is my understanding. With asset write-down, depreciation (on the accounting book) decreases, thus pretax income (on the book) increases. But for tax-purpose accounting (for the government), asset write-up/down isn't reflected unless there's some kind of asset purchase or Section 338 transaction, so depreciation remains unchanged. The write-down itself is recorded as a loss on income statement, but it's not tax-deductible, thus no change in tax.

So with asset write-down, on the company's accounting book, it is supposed to pay more tax due to decreased depreciation, but in reality, it pays less tax because the government's tax purpose accounting doesn't take the write-down into consideration. So on the book, the amount the firm pays less than its projected tax translates into DTA. I'd welcome any feedback/correction.

 

Optio sed ullam minus similique rerum excepturi. Hic sit quisquam laboriosam reprehenderit assumenda. Numquam sit minima voluptatem culpa cum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”