30 Comments
 

Have several friends in that group, a solid group in terms of deal flow. You'll be doing a lot of SaaS rollups in the MM space. Saturdays are protected and most Friday nights are off. Also as previously mentioned, Chicago is the main office. NYC is a regional office and is mainly seniors who are there to maintain client relationships with some of the New York based funds.

 

Depends who you work with and the transaction you are on. Tech is going to be sweaty just because the group is on a tear. Generally it seems people had Friday evenings off, Saturday's protected, some work (3-5 hours) on sunday's. It's not a lifestyle group by any means, but I think there are certainly worse groups at Blair or in banking broadly.

The truth is, most places you have a tradeoff between dealflow and hours. Want great deal flow? You will work a lot. Want WLB? Great you won't get great experience. Culturally there is some variance with general understanding that the midwest + Boston are the most cushy and other offices are more brutal in terms of culture. That said, as mentioned on this forum, the firm cross staffs all the time so it's very possible/likely to work with each office during an analyst or associate tenure.

One thing I would mention that was a big difference I noticed culturally from my time there and comparing notes with friends: it is very very very hard to be a useless associate in that group. I think this likely is true for EB's/MM's in general, but there were a lot of people let go or pushed out when I was there who lateralled from BB's that were used to a more cushy less hands on role and very quickly they were identified as being deadweight. I'm sure WB analysts have gripes with associates (as I did when I was there), but the uselessness of BB associates seemed to be in another league. Only reason I bring it up is I think if your goal is to have more WLB, go to a BB as an associate. 

 

Kinda to my point above—I didn’t see it get much better for associates baring the ones that were ex-analysts just being very efficient and knowing how to manage their time and a process and expectations properly.
 

I think it culturally was very much not cool for associates to be dumping work on analysts and felt associates worked pretty similar hours to analysts. The ones that didn’t had the org turn on them pretty fast. Kinda goes to my point of being an associate that doesn’t get a model or PowerPoint seemed to be a much bigger problem at WB than other places I have heard. If you have too much of a slippery desk as an associate, word gets around and given the org has so many people that have climbed the ranks it isn’t taken very well. So, 9am-12:30am M-Th, Friday’s off at 6pm, some Sunday work. Course the job is very cyclical in terms of work, so I’m sure there were chill weeks and hell weeks in there. Also, mileage I’m sure varied based on how well people could manage. I’m sure as an associate you could tell your analyst to work as you ate dinner or lifted for example. That said, I worked with a bunch of different teams and while it’s definitely a bias having been in the analyst seat, to me it always felt like my associates were split in acting and effectively being more like worse senior analysts (usually those just out of mba were better than A1’s, but not nearly as sharp as the senior analysts) or they ran the process and were effectively the VP as the real VP was busy with another process (usually a to a’s). 

 
Most Helpful

Since this seems helpful for some people—one other point I wanted to address was advice I was given prior to my stint that I think is excellent professional advice not given enough: “define your professional brand” 

I’m a huge competitive strategy nerd and one of the things I find most insightful about competitive strategy comes from porter who largely articulates two points (among others): 1) strategy is defining what you don’t do 2) attempting to excel at every area is often brand diminishing.

As a professional, try to think about the way you want to competitively position and what you will choose to differentiate on. As an analyst, I early on recognized I was smart enough to do the work and decided my brand was going to be being smart. That sounds simple and arrogant, but I tried to assist others in finding better ways to do things and gained a rep for being “the guy” to figure out complex things. I also was known for pushing back and refusing to do work I didn’t think made sense. Some analysts tried to differentiate themselves as “the hardest worker”. I think that is poor competitive strategy and it largely is a race to the bottom. The winner might get top bucket, but candidly I know I could get a reference from about anyone I worked with and I was really able to stay sane my entire stint. Meanwhile, I was certain there were people who went for the hardest working, fell short, and ended up with a rep as just a middling analyst without anything remarkable about their work product. My advice, try to position yourself and be known for one trait above others. A few examples:

1) Being a positive person—there are some analysts that this is literally their whole brand. They never complain and are great to work with. Again, sounds simple, but if you are the “have a great day! Guy/girl you could prob be a crap analyst and get mid bucket because everyone likes you. 

2) A machine —you never make mistakes. You can actually afford to be slow, but if you never make mistakes people will be like that person is wicked. Personally, I found this to be too much of a hassle, but I’m sure for someone hyper detail oriented and organized, this might be easier than being the positive chatty office person.
 

3) Smart guy/girl—know what goes on in the firm, know about other people deals and see the big picture. Also, try to step up on the most complex analyses. Again, this isn’t always something everyone can do, but for me I realized positioning here made the most sense for my skill set and how I come across. 
 

4) PowerPoint guy/girl. When everyone is worried about layouts or has no clue how to fix a graph, you are the go-to person. Again, sounds simple, but being the graphic design person in the office is actually a huge rep that is valued.

There are others, the bigger point I am making is you can’t beat everyone and be the best at everything. The analysts that try to win in every category I find usually struggled and felt overwhelmed. Try to improve in every area, but try to pick a niche and own it. Don’t be Wendy’s competing with BK and McDonald’s, be Chick-fil-A with the best chicken sandwich in the game and everyone knows it (even if you decide to be closed on sundays and not make burgers)

 

Voluptates et et reprehenderit aut. Maiores sequi libero odit quae maiores et nisi perspiciatis.

Voluptas quia et alias rerum reprehenderit dolor. Sit doloremque provident minus voluptas. Modi maiores excepturi sit tempore dolorem. Dolorem ipsam repellat qui modi aspernatur deleniti.

Impedit perferendis laborum nihil nesciunt. Debitis est expedita harum.

 

Nostrum qui libero aliquid. Voluptatem consequatur ea voluptatem ab tenetur. Sequi animi repellat omnis qui repudiandae dolor. Nostrum quos veritatis debitis ullam. Omnis eos quos eaque tempore odio voluptas. Officia porro iste dolor velit.

Omnis et ut provident dicta. Aut et quisquam eius repellendus dolores dolore consequatur. Commodi aliquam distinctio consequatur quia sed beatae saepe.

Est culpa modi est laboriosam blanditiis. Itaque deleniti sunt quas laboriosam doloribus dolorem dolor et. Totam nemo esse aut cupiditate enim.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”