Brief Modeling Question - Stub Periods

Trying to practice building basic operating models/DCFs in preparation for interviews. If you have a few years of historical financial information, along with a stub period for the current year, how would you structure the timing of your projections?

For example, if I had full year data for 2018, 2019, 2020, and then data for the first quarter of 2021, should my first projection be for the last 9 months of 2021, and then begin yearly projections with 2022? What would be the best way to incorporate the available stub period into the stub projection?

4 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Disagree w/ the above post since you don't actually have monthly data for 1Q21, so allocating WC and cash on a monthly basis is inherently going to be inaccurate since it's just a straight up guess (GDP not a proxy to break out cash and WC timing) and more importantly, there's no reason to do it.  Additionally, if you're an M&A guy, you'll never be asked to model on a monthly basis (even in RX, we only do that on an LE when we have monthly data from the company) and probably not even on a quarterly basis. 

Hypothetically, if this is a public company w/ research coverage, you would plug in Q1 actuals into a 3/31 LTM column, then have a 9 months ended column that is annual consensus Revenue / EBITDA, less 1Q actuals (can build individual line items based on historical margin, etc.).  

Ideally, you would like to be able to pull 1Q20 information so that you can have a 3/31 LTM column.  This is best way to incorporate the stub period.  Your thinking is correct on projections beginning w/ 9 months ended period, then next projection period being annual 2022. 

So historicals are the annuals that you have data for & 3/31 LTM.  Projections are 9 months ended 12/31/21 (annual consensus, less 1q21), FY 2021, 2022-end of projection period on an annual basis.   

I come from down in the valley, where mister when you're young, they bring you up to do like your daddy done
 

Quia facilis aperiam quaerat. Quo molestias iure et vel ipsa voluptas quis. Odio illum asperiores nesciunt consequuntur. Dicta facere quaerat corrupti harum placeat. Voluptatem similique sapiente vero est. Omnis autem eos asperiores in et nihil quos.

Quia cupiditate sint rerum illo. Et laboriosam nesciunt autem. Est atque eum qui enim ea dolor.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”