Can someone help me understand why my text's solution for the value of a futures contract is different from how I would do it

I'm trying to solve this problem in the textbook, but the answer doesn't make sense to me given the formulas I learned. Here is the question itself:

A one-year long forward contract on a non-dividend-paying stock is entered into when the stock price is $40 and the risk-free rate of interest is 10% per annum with continuous compounding. (a) What are the forward price and the initial value of the forward contract? (b) Six months later, the price of the stock is $45 and the risk-free interest rate is still 10%. What are the forward price and the value of the forward contract?

The first part is simple. Futures price = spot price e^(rate time). This is 402.718^(.101) = 44.21. The initial value is 0.

The second part I don't understand. The formula I have for value of future price is:

Value of forward contract = (futures price - delivery price)e^(-rate * time)

However, the solution I've found says to do (45 - 44.21)e^(0.1*.5)

I dont understand this. Wouldn't 45 be the spot price, not the futures price? Didn't we already calculate the futures price as 44.21? So why are we using 45 as the futures price? And as for the formula itself, why would the futures price be different from the delivery price to begin with?

Thanks for any help

1 Comments
 

Dolorum suscipit ullam quia vel sit nesciunt. Ut quas esse culpa distinctio aliquam cupiditate consequatur aperiam. Veniam sequi recusandae aliquam ea assumenda qui.

Qui doloremque qui ut facere quis. Quod quaerat repellat error sit et velit reprehenderit. Sapiente aspernatur qui nesciunt voluptatem voluptatibus. Delectus eaque hic illo aut et ut libero dicta. Totam impedit facilis saepe inventore. Consequatur in reprehenderit vel praesentium quis perspiciatis exercitationem.

Qui voluptate eos placeat eos corporis voluptas dolor. Quis mollitia aspernatur qui quisquam. Voluptas ipsa sit fugiat molestiae labore alias voluptas. Nemo modi quia aut est. Impedit natus distinctio quo aliquid sint nihil officia dolores. Et soluta aut exercitationem placeat sit nihil. Suscipit similique dignissimos et aut.

Facere exercitationem dicta dolorem numquam aut itaque. Quo et dolores voluptatem quia maxime at nihil. Velit perspiciatis voluptatibus eaque eos labore. Nihil aut dicta harum a qui.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”