Citi league tables
In factsets M&A league table, they are always so high with so few deals. And yet their reputation is worse than Bofas. Why is this???
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
Career Resources
They are 4 on transaction volume (FactSet), but 8 on M&A revenue globally per LSEG. Tells me they might be heavy on the no fee cred only department. Or the throw on the deal announcement because I am a lender department.
https://go.factset.com/hubfs/mergerstat_em/quarterly/AdvisorQuarterly.p…
https://thesource.lseg.com/thesource/getfile/index/343f6a50-49bd-43ec-9…
Thank you!!! It seems RBC is guilty of this too!
Why the MS they have massive deal value but tiny fees.
I think the statement that part of Citi’s league table credit is lender driven without a true advisory role is accurate. However, they also have a few big wins in the large cap / mega cap space. E.g. Mars-Kellanova has Citi as buy side.
Was that deal all cash or was financing in it at all?
according to Mars' website, JPM and Citi provided financing.
Quis qui dolorum eum. Nemo et sunt voluptatem distinctio.
Et suscipit magnam ducimus adipisci. Et officia dolores voluptatem quia qui. Accusantium voluptatem rerum nemo omnis fugiat dolor.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...