CS First Boston

First reactions of the community to CS First Boston? Both from juniors and ideally some seniors.Set aside the brand, I actually think a partnership will attract some good ambitious bankers from BBs. MIP normally makes more money than stock in a conglomerate. Issue is you cannot advise sponsors without offering financing and the name is still tainted.

  • Forgot to mention: focus is clearly NA. If you are in CS EMEA start recruiting asap.

  • From CS:- Rooted in strong positions in North America, largest and most attractive capital market• Independent proposition and partnership model to be competitive in attracting and retaining the best talent and shaping a strong culture• More global and broader than boutiques, more focused than bulge bracket players• Well-established First Boston heritage in Capital Markets andAdvisory, leader in Financial Sponsors and Leveraged Finance for 20 years

57 Comments
 

The Investment Banking part of CS seemed far less threatened in Europe while there were rumours that CS would exit the NA market.
But indeed, although First Boston revival sounds like a good thing, I have no idea what will be the impact on the EMEA business at all

 

To quote a comment from another thread:

"CS has never had a strong franchise in Europe and there are very few bankers worth keeping around. My understanding is that CS has never once earned a profit in Europe in IB. Europe is also a far less profitable lev fin market given the oversaturation of banking."
 

YTD, CS is ranked bottom of all the BBs in EMEA (and even below Santander, BNP Paribas, UniCredit, Mediobanca).

 

The Swiss bank will reshape its investment bank in Europe, the Middle East and Africa around M&A work, and pull back from capital markets activity after consistently underperforming, its chief executive, Ulrich Körner, told journalists during a 27 October call announcing its new strategy.

"We will resize our capital markets business in Emea to be a real advisory only business," he said. "We have not achieved results over many years and we do not have the right standing in Emea."

 
Most Helpful

Likely the best possible outcome for the investment banking business. The CS brand has been tarnished amidst recent scandals - reviving the CSFB namesake as a standalone entity enshrines the legacy of the Leveraged Finance and Sponsors franchise dating back to DLJ/First Boston which has dominated the space for decades, and on its own is an incredibly profitable business. A lot of the old private equity guys even still call it CSFB. Despite a talent exodus from other areas, the leveraged finance franchise is still home to some real heavy hitters and kingpin types (think Jeff Cohen and Malcolm Price) who bring in a ton of business. Many of the old-guard Sponsor MDs are single handedly responsible for raking in hundreds of millions of dollars in fees annually, and despite what you hear in the press virtually none of these guys have left. 

Assuming the new unit is able to successfully obtain external capital, the theoretical upside of the spinoff is much less bureaucracy and more meritocratic compensation for seniors which are both massive positives. The bureaucracy point cannot be overstated enough. Having to jump through a million bureaucratic hoops with Swiss management in Zurich just to underwrite an LBO makes you want to bash your head in. A new CSFB entity would theoretically be much more streamlined and would foster a much more entrepreneurial culture - the same kind that made DLJ and First Boston (and subsequently CS to a lesser extent) so great. Michael Klein absolutely fits this mold, which is probably what drove him to spearhead the idea in the first place. On the flip side, this type of culture will pretty easily weed out the lower-margin areas of the investment bank that previously were able to survive under the cloud of the Swiss bureaucratic backdrop.

Of course, this whole thing hinges on whether or not CSFB is able to raise outside capital. You can't have a competitive leveraged finance practice without a balance sheet. Given the caliber of guys running the show (Miller, Klein, etc.) I would probably wager that they're able to pull it off, but only time will tell.

 

Have to say - I am very impressed by this move and agree completely. Very excited what we are seeing in banking right now between CSFB and the BDT/MSD combination. 

While not exactly the same thing, the alignment under Michael Klein (and potential combination with his boutique) does feel incredibly similar to Paul Taubman merging his small advisory boutique with Blackstone's investment bank. Shortly after the spin merge in 2015, some of the top Media & Comms bankers on the street left to join the newly created PJT Partners and the rest is history. 

Michael Klein is the real f-ing deal, and when combined with the info put here already, where you still have top senior bankers I think is a great recipe for success. If I were a CS shareholder, I would hope MKlein uses this restructuring to cut loose all the dead weight that has stuck around because of politicking and connections. Further, I wouldn't be at all surprised if CSFB starts recruiting like crazy, paying very high guarantees, once the spin is complete. 

 

Off topic, but there is something uniquely annoying about people who make a point of refering to investment banks by names that those firms haven't used for a decade or more. No, you don't work at Merrill, you aren't going to the H&Q conference in January, and you didn't get debt financing from First Boston. So far I haven't heard anyone refer to Jefferies as Drexel but that guy is probably out there somewhere.

 

Apparently they already have outside capital lined up but also seemed to emphasize that they wouldn't be balance sheet dependent but rather rely on just "unconflicted" advisory as many already do. I think this could be valuable but it'll come with crazy comp guarantees for rainmakers they want to poach and EB-level econs on transaction fees to incentivize joiners. So outside investors could be dealing with subpar returns for quite some time as the firm acquires talent, pays them, and then builds the brand back up with regular dealflow. And which a capital-light model, once the business is up and running, it should be a pretty high margin idea but also highly susceptible to M&A revenue trends which could make it super choppy. Can't wait to see what they end up doing 

 

I accepted an offer for S&T with CS for next summer - how seriously should I start recruiting?

Edit: Offer was for a 2023 SA

 

I’m of the opinion that it’s a bizarre move. A lot of senior people remember First Boston, but my guess is that a lot of people in the junior ranks (asked about a dozen juniors and nobody knew what it was) and associates + VP’s were not around when First Boston was in business so don’t really know much about their success. 

The incentive comp piece that another poster spoke about is promising but at the end of the day it seems like it’s a move to boost morale at the senior ranks by engendering feelings of nostalgia at the firm while allowing CS to rebrand.

It’s certainly not nothing but I’m skeptical of the success the move will have longer term and think it will ultimately amount to menial changes if anything.

 

No offence but those juniors must be ridiculously unknowledgeable. That's like saying you don't know who Michael Klein is how out of it are you ??? First Boston alums went on to found PWP, BlackRock, Jefferies, Apollo the list goes on. I think a lot of it hinges on their ability to raise outside capital and how seniors feel about everything but there's tremendous upside

 

The $500mm is a commitment amount from an undisclosed third party, not CS itself. CS is providing more extensive capital for this. Further, the Saudi bank that participated in the cap raise has stated its willingness to provide capital for CSFB as well. 

 

I'm an incoming IB analyst for the LevFin team in NYC. What does this mean? Is my offer going to get retracted? Or am I going to be joining the First Boston brand? Thoughts?

 

Lol at the amount of people who already changed their LinkedIn to CS First Boston. The screaming insecurity. Still the same firm smh

 

Rebrand doesn’t mean the entity exists. Just technically will take a while, it’s not a trivial carve-out especially with the new capital and the merge of MK&Co.

I’m actually quite positive on it, though the message from top management that CSFB will continue doing ECM and LevFin really worries me: either they don’t know what they are saying or more likely they find it hard to forget old habits. It should be a semi-EB with the ability to issue CSFB shares to attract talent, not another wannabe BB

 

Molestias dolorem quo illum nesciunt. Dicta consequatur ex ab quis magni. Veniam molestiae odit molestiae aut sed quos aut.

Id officia voluptas ducimus aspernatur est ut quis ab. Totam corrupti et quidem ipsa. Reiciendis consequatur ratione qui quia. Ducimus officiis autem explicabo voluptatem earum saepe sit non.

Adipisci voluptates et est et. Nemo sapiente ut quia explicabo doloribus. Consequuntur eos et ad non dolor quidem. Qui non nihil maiores nihil omnis.

 

Et ab necessitatibus voluptas autem sint et. Neque quo aspernatur est enim. Optio tenetur rem excepturi ut. Voluptatem nulla vel consequatur ut consequatur. Id dolorem laudantium exercitationem eligendi consectetur minima est. Et ratione magni possimus amet labore recusandae.

 

Odio cupiditate ad sit aut. Quaerat magni temporibus qui error. Ratione commodi consequatur atque ullam ea molestiae accusamus. Ea perspiciatis nobis omnis. Sint ut sequi et quia vel. Non pariatur aut non vero aperiam.

Eos laborum harum odit. Soluta aperiam deserunt labore quis veniam facere autem itaque. Sapiente est numquam labore nihil non ut quis. Quod qui molestias dolores blanditiis perferendis eveniet qui.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”