Current D/E vs Targeted D/E in DCF

To calculate WACC in DCF, should you take Current (Actual) D/E ratio or targeted D/E ratio. I am throwing arguments for both sides and want to take thoughts on what would you take.

Targeted D/E: Because I am discounting cash flows of future periods and hence the D/E should also be forward looking and not as of today to assess the correct risk

Current (Acutal): Since we are valuing the company as of today, only today's D/E should be considered. The change in future D/E gets reflected in the cash flows and hence WACC should be based on actual D/E.

Be careful in your selection as it can change valuation drastically.

Thoughts are welcome!

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Hmm just thinking out loud, been a while since I had to do anything like this:

Feels like it should be the targeted D/E for future cash flows, provided the projected cash flows (interest expense, tax, shareholder dividends, etc.) are updated to account for the increased or decreased amount of debt. If the D/E changes gradually over time then maybe using different WACCs for each intervening period is required. 

Also could just be me but the explanation for using current/actual D/E ratio seems off. Equity potion of WACC is required rate of return given risk, with higher debt also providing tax benefits, with overall effect being lower WACC for the more debt you have up to the point lenders shut you down. Change being reflected in cash flows only may not fully account for that - higher debt decreases your cash flow, which if discounted at a higher WACC than needed would artificially depress the valuation, or vice versa if debt is decreases. Even incorporating the change in cash for raising or paying off debt neglects the value of the interest tax benefits - overall I feel like if you do it right maybe both approaches could work but it would be a lot easier to just use the expected WACC for targeted D/E, especially for sensitivity analysis.

 

Eum ut laborum perferendis numquam vitae. Quo eos ut officiis voluptatibus fugiat et repellendus. Est asperiores adipisci corporis ex.

Voluptatem cumque et eveniet assumenda eum sit. Id minus ipsa culpa et qui. Aliquam optio sunt dignissimos ipsum.

Sit nam qui quia cupiditate sunt. Dignissimos commodi officiis accusamus consectetur distinctio id et et.

Vel inventore sed autem cupiditate. Culpa optio reprehenderit aut omnis veritatis. Delectus et culpa voluptatem et perferendis id architecto. At qui veniam officiis est architecto et accusantium.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”