Deferred income - Debt-Like

Friday brain fog….

I always push for deferred income liabilities; where cash has been received in advance of recognising the income to be treated as debt-like.

As the buyer will need to deliver the service and the Target had not ‘earned’ the cash under the seller’s ownership.

However I’m having brain fog….

The target has £100k of deferred income. This will result in their cash been £100k higher with a corresponding £100k deferred income liability.

I buy the business for £1m (EV). I give them an additional amount for cash at completion £200k (for which £100k relates to the deferred income received). I treat the deferred income creditor as debt and this is all the debt the business has. Therefore £1m + £200k cash less £100k debt = £1.1m

The net impact of the deferred income adjustment is 0 as cash increased by £100k which is offset by the debt adjustment.

After completion when I deliver the project I won’t get paid as the cash has already been received - therefore I am technically out of pocket - as the adjustment above is nill. 

It is not captured in WCAP either as the closing WCAP will increase by £100k (by classifying deferred income as debt and adjusting out) but the target will also increase as deferred income will be adjusted out the target on a like for like basis. 

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Problem with that logic is that deferred revenue doesn’t come all at once in a single point in time - your scenario basically assumes all deferred revenue zeroes out at some point and the business receives a large inflow of cash which is not how deferred revenue typically is accounted for in normal business operations

In any case - cash free, debt free: the benefit of the deferred revenue as a debt-like item only makes sense if cash is excluded from working capital and the debt if the cash balance is assumed to be 0. Your scenario seems to assume that an actual cash balance will be delivered at closing (rarely happens in practice, and if it does, there is most likely a provision in the SPA that prevents double dipping)

 

Dolor qui ea dignissimos eius id. Corrupti minima qui dolore et. Qui at vitae et omnis animi.

Qui illum commodi assumenda corporis aut. Autem minima ipsum sequi eos et aut. Non et qui libero velit qui. Magnam velit et distinctio veritatis. Consequatur perspiciatis aperiam fugit ducimus dolore architecto. Iusto possimus numquam esse.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”