Def DB. I think you're just better off with getting a BB on your resume off the bat and you can alway move into a boutique m&a shop for a third year.
Ace all your PE interview questions with the WSO Private Equity Prep Pack: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/guide/private-equity-interview-prep-questions
i would go to DB because you will likely be exposed to a wider variety of deals, given that DB will underwrite. HL is a great shop but you will only be exposed to advisory. At DB you will work on advisory as well as deals in the capital markets. I feel the broader exposure would be more helpful at a junior level
I might be the only one. But I would go with HLHZ M&A. In m&a, u are dealing a wider range of industries and you don't really need to worry about the capital market side. hlhz is still pretty reputable. Yes, you will not be going into mega funds or probably any funds over 10 bil if you go to hlhz m&a but I doubt you will have a much better chance with db healthcare.
You probably will be the only one. DB healthcare clearly. Would be different if it was a more established small place like Perella or Greenhill, but I don't think people see HLHZ that way.
The M&A group at HL has serious deal flow and I can learn a lot my being close to the execution. DB, even though its a BB, I don't think joining a HC industry group is the best idea when you're starting as an analyst. I am interested in Tech in the long run and don't want to get cornered. HL is very well known and they are amongst the top MM shops and are slowing inching towards bigger and better deals.
The M&A group at HL has serious deal flow and I can learn a lot my being close to the execution. DB, even though its a BB, I don't think joining a HC industry group is the best idea when you're starting as an analyst. I am interested in Tech in the long run and don't want to get cornered. HL is very well known and they are amongst the top MM shops and are slowly inching towards bigger and better deals.
SuitedWolf: from your posts on HL, sounds like you may have a place in mind (preference for HL) and wanted to see if others would back you up on it. HC doesn't have the same kind of 'damage' as RE or FIG groups in terms of being pigeonholed or limiting exit opps. Which is why majority of the board has voted for DB HC - that, and also it's a BB vs. HL's MM.
I think the board's more or less spoken on this... but you gotta just go with what you want. Either group will lead to PE or other opps. And even though someone said HL won't lead to funds over $10 bn, it doesn't mean it can't be done (just much harder). You'll have good opps available though (e.g., Onex has a guy from HL). But DB's name will lead to more interviews later on.
Culpa et ducimus deleniti in soluta autem. Quasi recusandae vel dolores veritatis ex qui. Perferendis ipsum hic molestiae fugiat.
Temporibus aut eaque sint praesentium consequatur. Error quis neque ex voluptas ut velit.
Ab delectus quam itaque modi commodi. Esse aliquid ut magnam veniam enim. Qui excepturi aut sed et. Vero rerum natus consequatur illo aut qui dicta. Omnis aliquid nobis facilis in. Nisi assumenda corrupti natus tenetur fugit vel.
Quia numquam est harum beatae. Rerum et molestiae sunt. Eius corrupti sint odit quidem id et voluptatum. Alias provident voluptatum et neque et. Atque omnis aut aut praesentium error odio. Ut corporis dignissimos quasi odit dolores dolorum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
DB all the way.
Deutsche - do you have offers?
but wouldn't healthcare just pigeonhole you? HL is one of the top MM and is growing fast. Why do you guys say DB?
Def DB. I think you're just better off with getting a BB on your resume off the bat and you can alway move into a boutique m&a shop for a third year.
agree with DB - its a BB
i would go to DB because you will likely be exposed to a wider variety of deals, given that DB will underwrite. HL is a great shop but you will only be exposed to advisory. At DB you will work on advisory as well as deals in the capital markets. I feel the broader exposure would be more helpful at a junior level
Just so you know it going in, analysts in DB HC get rocked. Many perks to BB HC experience when looking at exit opps tho
DB.
I might be the only one. But I would go with HLHZ M&A. In m&a, u are dealing a wider range of industries and you don't really need to worry about the capital market side. hlhz is still pretty reputable. Yes, you will not be going into mega funds or probably any funds over 10 bil if you go to hlhz m&a but I doubt you will have a much better chance with db healthcare.
Might be biased too since i prefer smaller shops
You probably will be the only one. DB healthcare clearly. Would be different if it was a more established small place like Perella or Greenhill, but I don't think people see HLHZ that way.
The M&A group at HL has serious deal flow and I can learn a lot my being close to the execution. DB, even though its a BB, I don't think joining a HC industry group is the best idea when you're starting as an analyst. I am interested in Tech in the long run and don't want to get cornered. HL is very well known and they are amongst the top MM shops and are slowing inching towards bigger and better deals.
The M&A group at HL has serious deal flow and I can learn a lot my being close to the execution. DB, even though its a BB, I don't think joining a HC industry group is the best idea when you're starting as an analyst. I am interested in Tech in the long run and don't want to get cornered. HL is very well known and they are amongst the top MM shops and are slowly inching towards bigger and better deals.
SuitedWolf: from your posts on HL, sounds like you may have a place in mind (preference for HL) and wanted to see if others would back you up on it. HC doesn't have the same kind of 'damage' as RE or FIG groups in terms of being pigeonholed or limiting exit opps. Which is why majority of the board has voted for DB HC - that, and also it's a BB vs. HL's MM.
I think the board's more or less spoken on this... but you gotta just go with what you want. Either group will lead to PE or other opps. And even though someone said HL won't lead to funds over $10 bn, it doesn't mean it can't be done (just much harder). You'll have good opps available though (e.g., Onex has a guy from HL). But DB's name will lead to more interviews later on.
DB...you can always go into a boutique after you get that BB on your resume
DB
Culpa et ducimus deleniti in soluta autem. Quasi recusandae vel dolores veritatis ex qui. Perferendis ipsum hic molestiae fugiat.
Temporibus aut eaque sint praesentium consequatur. Error quis neque ex voluptas ut velit.
Ab delectus quam itaque modi commodi. Esse aliquid ut magnam veniam enim. Qui excepturi aut sed et. Vero rerum natus consequatur illo aut qui dicta. Omnis aliquid nobis facilis in. Nisi assumenda corrupti natus tenetur fugit vel.
Quia numquam est harum beatae. Rerum et molestiae sunt. Eius corrupti sint odit quidem id et voluptatum. Alias provident voluptatum et neque et. Atque omnis aut aut praesentium error odio. Ut corporis dignissimos quasi odit dolores dolorum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...