12 Comments
 

Don't think it's necessarily true that BX / Warburg are the only ones getting first looks - PE analysts are much rarer compared to bankers and generally preferred by HFs (have a more relevant investing background / skillset), so UMM PE analysts from reputable and established programs (Ares, SLP, etc.) typically have access to many of the same HF opportunities

 

LGP has a good rep as far as I'm aware, but it's a really small analyst class (1-2 / year) so there's not a lot of data points. I don't have great insight into Bain but I've seen a few decent HF exits. Berkshire is solidly MM and wouldn't put them in the same category as what I'd consider an UMM fund, I wasn't even aware they had an analyst program tbh

 
Most Helpful

The way I'd think about that is not so much any significant difference in initial HH looks (if you're a good performer at a top EB / BB group you'll get your chances at HF opps) and more about how the respective experiences prepare you. From an interview standpoint, there's less friction coming from a PE analyst program because you're already doing investing work and can better speak to diligence process, drivers of value, risk / reward, etc. as opposed to banking analysts who sometimes don't even know what GLG is, let alone having led an expert call. This is pretty important because unlike PE Asso hiring, HF hiring is a lot less structured and for the most part generally happens throughout the year based on needs and turnover, so someone interviewing for a HF position having done like 6mo. of PE analyst work is initially better positioned than a banker (although its possible for a banker to get there, its just more incremental work learning the basics that takes time away from other aspects of the process like creating your pitch)

 

Aut maiores similique molestiae animi quisquam ipsa hic repudiandae. Vel rerum ex consequuntur perspiciatis. Perspiciatis provident vel dolor. Nisi et cupiditate iusto quos molestiae nesciunt.

Repellat fugit iure labore ipsa eum voluptas ipsum. Nihil esse veniam omnis non ipsam. Quia est fugiat ut est omnis illo veniam.

Asperiores sint vitae dolorum totam nihil. Dolor ex porro neque enim maxime voluptas aut. Quod iure et aspernatur officiis asperiores quasi. Quo ut reprehenderit necessitatibus.

Porro nostrum harum assumenda explicabo iste doloremque consequuntur. Consequatur natus et et est qui placeat eum. Nihil eos earum rem nemo alias temporibus. Corrupti cupiditate ratione ullam tempora voluptatum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (50) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”